Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-28-2008, 07:38 PM   #1 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,528

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 62.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,977 Times in 3,613 Posts
ToyotaNation truck forum freakout: "would you put this (aero) cap on your truck?"



The link below takes you to a forum thread that is a response to Brett's aero bed cap on his F-150 that was featured in the CNET news.com gallery of ecomodded vehicles.

The response is overwhelmingly negative.

I seriously doubt it's representative of truck owners in general. There's some pretty astounding ignorance in some of the comments.

Link: Would you put this cap on your truck?

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-28-2008, 07:50 PM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
There's some pretty astounding ignorance in some of the comments.
I was even taken back by their comments. Its pretty obvious the level of knowledge for this sort of thing is incredibly lacking in the truck world. Its quite sad reading their responces. They are the reason progress is so stunted in the area of fuel economy.


I'm quite tempted to post there as I'm already a registered user (tercel/paseo forums). However, I doubt it would do any good. It doesn't look like anything will change their minds.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2008, 07:51 PM   #3 (permalink)
Bicycle Junky
 
NoCO2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 464

Putsaround - '96 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)

The Commuter - '07 Trek 1000SL
90 day: 617.28 mpg (US)

Zippy - '91 Honda Civic DX
90 day: 33.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
wow...and I thought I lived in a redneck part of the world...
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2008, 08:36 PM   #4 (permalink)
Giant Moving Eco-Wall
 
DifferentPointofView's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Dale, IL (or A-Dale)
Posts: 1,120

The Jeep! - '95 Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ Laredo
90 day: 23.75 mpg (US)

The Caliber - '07 Dodge Caliber R/T
90 day: 30.6 mpg (US)

The 'Scort - '98 Ford Escort LX
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Mythbusters... I never trusted them, because their tests are flawed in every way. One time they did a test and proved it false, and a university did a test and proved it right.

I like how they believe anything on tv. and THIS is exactly what I talk about when I say the compact car people hate the Muscle car people the Jeep Guys Diss the Hummer guys, and everything else in between. We'll see when the new toyota Tundra comes with an aero cap later on hehe.

Well, theirs nothing we can do without showing SIGNIFICANT DATA
__________________


Yea.. I drive a Jeep and I'm on a fuel economy site, but you just wouldn't understand... "It's a Jeep thing!" *Jeep Wave*

Did I Use Too Many Abbreviations? Here's The Abbreviations List
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2008, 08:36 PM   #5 (permalink)
MechE
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,151

The Miata - '01 Mazda MX-5 Miata
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 18 Posts
Wow...

And I love how they misquote the Mythbusters episode.
-> Mythbusters never tested a bed cap nor made any claims about bed caps. They did test tailgate up/down, tailgate off, mesh tailgate.

And another thing, which makes me slightly perturbed - "better" does not mean best. Tailgate up| better. That doesn't mean it's the best solution. It's amazing no one mentioned the logical fallacy of the several comments saying something to the effect "Didn't you see mythbusters - tailgate up is better [than tailgate down] - therefore, this won't work."

I'm half tempted to post over there too, but what good will that do?

Also, I don't see where Bondo claimed it was 1.7mpg increase (someone posted in that forum that bondo claimed this on the ecomodder fourm. I'm looking at the thread (http://forum.ecomodder.com/showthread.php?t=583) and don't see it (am I missing something?)

-----
Take it as a reality check - want to know why people are so resistant? That's why. Personally, I'm thinking its a general lack of education in the realm of physics (IIRC, US is at the bottom of that education quality list). That being said, this is why I think posting over there will be fruitless - I haven't established any credibility over there, and then I'm going to put forward data (not claims, data) contrary to their speculation. Perhaps if we were in the old days when it was general knowledge and people realized aero was a way to go faster on the salt flats - but that age is long passed
__________________
Cars have not created a new problem. They merely made more urgent the necessity to solve existing ones.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2008, 08:38 PM   #6 (permalink)
Giant Moving Eco-Wall
 
DifferentPointofView's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Dale, IL (or A-Dale)
Posts: 1,120

The Jeep! - '95 Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ Laredo
90 day: 23.75 mpg (US)

The Caliber - '07 Dodge Caliber R/T
90 day: 30.6 mpg (US)

The 'Scort - '98 Ford Escort LX
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Make an annonymous account, and show them how stupid and ignorant they are. That way they'll never know it was you.
__________________


Yea.. I drive a Jeep and I'm on a fuel economy site, but you just wouldn't understand... "It's a Jeep thing!" *Jeep Wave*

Did I Use Too Many Abbreviations? Here's The Abbreviations List
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2008, 08:51 PM   #7 (permalink)
MechE
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,151

The Miata - '01 Mazda MX-5 Miata
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by DifferentPointofView View Post
Make an annonymous account, and show them how stupid and ignorant they are. That way they'll never know it was you.
It's not worth it though - the state of mind over there is completely against it :/ If it were a bunch of people saying "I wonder if this works" I'd jump right in. But it's a bunch of people stating as truth that it doesn't.

If someone wants to come here, cool - I'll spend time and explain it. Why? Because they took the effort meaning it might just be worth my time to do a nice awesome write up. Otherwise, naught - even their moderators are turning a blind eye on which seems to be the ethos in that thread.

Requirements for thread worth<my time:
Unsubstantiated claims? Check
Misquoted facts from someone else? Check
Internal Conflict? Check
Ostracizing someone within your own limited community? Check
__________________
Cars have not created a new problem. They merely made more urgent the necessity to solve existing ones.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2008, 09:08 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 405
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Gone4
You assume they can understand aerodynamics enough to be persuaded by an argument concerning this cap. If they are relying on unrelated mythbusters testing, then chances are they won't understand or care to learn about aerodynamics.

I actually think it looks pretty good, but that's probably the nerd engineer in me.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2008, 09:19 PM   #9 (permalink)
MechE
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,151

The Miata - '01 Mazda MX-5 Miata
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenKreton View Post
You assume they can understand aerodynamics enough to be persuaded by an argument concerning this cap. If they are relying on unrelated mythbusters testing, then chances are they won't understand or care to learn about aerodynamics.

I actually think it looks pretty good, but that's probably the nerd engineer in me.
That's exactly why I'm not going to post over there

I think it's amazing how much people think weight plays a role. Yes, it's significant for acceleration/city use - but how much stop and go traffic do you have at highway speeds? While keeping a constant 0 acceleration, an extra 100 pounds is of no consequence (at least, not enough to be measurable)....
__________________
Cars have not created a new problem. They merely made more urgent the necessity to solve existing ones.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2008, 09:51 PM   #10 (permalink)
EV OR DIESEL
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 1,758

FarFarfrumpumpen - '03 Volkswagen Jetta Wagon GLS Premium

Quorra - '12 Tesla Model S P85
Thanks: 57
Thanked 113 Times in 86 Posts
Send a message via AIM to dremd
Heard Mentality on that forum. I'd bet that if the first 2 post were more + you would have a better representation.

Bear in mind that truck owners get bombarded by products that "improve" fuel economy, the majority do not . . . .

It is funny it wasn't that long ago (3~5 years ago) that I thought that the majority of Toyota owners were intelligent. Now I feel as though the majority are not. The realization point in my mind was when they entered NASCAR.

Edit:
Bear in mind that members of a truck forum are going to be primarily in to making their truck Bigger Beefier Badder NOT Eco . . . .

__________________
2016 Tesla Model X
2022 Sprinter
Gone 2012 Tesla Model S P85
Gone 2013 Nissan LEAF SV
2012 Nissan LEAF SV
6 speed ALH TDI Swapped in to a 2003 Jetta Wagon
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com