09-23-2014, 08:58 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 140
Thanks: 109
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
|
Is this true? (Instantaneous MPG higher at 60-65 versus 50-55 using DWL)
I've been observing my UltraGauge for the past few weeks and I notice that my Instantaneous MPG value goes higher at 60-65 versus 50-55 using DWL and no A/C with a throttle position below 18. It also causes my Average MPG value to rise and my Instantaneous Gallons Per Hour stays relatively the same.
Is it possible that my vehicle gets better mileage at higher speeds with low-moderate throttle position??
__________________
The name "Camry" is an Anglicized phonetic transcription of the Japanese word kanmuri meaning "crown".
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
09-23-2014, 09:15 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
|
Yes, add some P&G and watch it go even more.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Cobb For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-23-2014, 09:36 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 506
Woody - '90 Mercury Grand Marquis Wagon LS Last 3: 19.57 mpg (US) Brick - '99 Chevrolet K2500 Suburban LS Last 3: 12.94 mpg (US) M. C. - '01 Chevrolet Impala Base 90 day: 18.73 mpg (US) R. J. - '05 Ford Explorer 4wd 90 day: 16.66 mpg (US)
Thanks: 936
Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts
|
That's what I've been wondering about my Dad's 3-Litre Caravan. However, I don't have a lot of flat areas nearby that I know about to test this on being in Pennsylvania. I noticed that with the TPS being at 19, 20 or 21 and going at about 70 MPH on a Highway (There are some places where the speed limit is that high in PA) the Instant MPGs actually go in the upper 30s and lower 40s according to the ScanGauge II (Set at -5% or -4%)
That's with tires at 45 PSI, no roof-rack and with the middle and rear seats out.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to 101Volts For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-23-2014, 09:43 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
|
Its possible, but I would challenge you to do more "controlled" experiments and compare data.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ksa8907 For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-23-2014, 10:16 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
|
Its has something to do with the map people post that shows a grid pattern, then a bunch of circles like a topographic map with rpms vs engine load. There is a magic speed or gearing vs load you get best mpg, then it drops like a rock.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cobb For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-24-2014, 12:32 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 140
Thanks: 109
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
|
My stock speedometer is only off by about 3 MPH, so I know that my speed isn't much different than what is shown. If I keep my load light and stay in overdrive, then my MPG increases according to my UltraGauge.
I've tried different loads, throttle positions, DWL versus cruise control, acceleration techniques.....it seems that 60 MPH is the magic number but I will continue to test. I will know on my next fillup if it has helped at all.
My Camry has a MAP sensor as well.
__________________
The name "Camry" is an Anglicized phonetic transcription of the Japanese word kanmuri meaning "crown".
|
|
|
09-24-2014, 01:55 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,241
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,234 Times in 1,724 Posts
|
Where do HX drivers get their best mileage?
|
|
|
09-24-2014, 03:03 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
herp derp Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
|
|
|
|
09-24-2014, 08:43 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
|
I don't think I've seen any Speed vs MPG chart for a conventional vehicle where the most efficient speed is 60Mph, especially with an automatic.
Relying on OBD instrumentation for instantaneous fuel consumption is a bit daft if you think about it.
If you really want to know, fill up, drive a 100miles at X speed and repeat.
|
|
|
09-24-2014, 11:27 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverCrown9701
Is it possible that my vehicle gets better mileage at higher speeds with low-moderate throttle position??
|
It's really unlikely.
Watching the "instant" MPG gauge is problematic. It moves around too much to be very useful in predicting overall MPG, and we tend to cherry-pick observations that lead to confirmation bias.
If you look at our collection of speed vs. MPG graphs, the dominant pattern for normal venicles is: best cruising MPG typically happens at the lowest speed in top gear.
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...you-15182.html
2002 Camry automatic:
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
|