Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-13-2017, 12:49 AM   #121 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
teoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 1,245

A3 - '12 Audi A3
Thanks: 65
Thanked 225 Times in 186 Posts
Do you have a thread about it?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-13-2017, 01:44 AM   #122 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
ar5boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Sydney
Posts: 110
Thanks: 8
Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enki View Post
So you mean you injected water (unmixed) at the same rate as you were consuming fuel right? I ask because I'm pretty sure that putting water in the gas tank is a not so great idea. Lol.
Roughly as much, Yes.

I was using an electric-water-pump and a misting nozzle to spray into the carburetor. There was a switch on the throttle cable to turn the pump on. It idled without the water running.

The water tank was in the back of the van. I wasn't worried about it exploding.

Once I hydrolocked the engine but took off the sparks plug and it started again. Van was stolen otherwise I might have been still driving it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by teoman View Post
Do you have a thread about it?
Sorry no.

But there is nothing I couldn't do again. I believe that what I did was reproduceable. I still have the pumps and nozzles and the gear.

I think it would work for anyone doing lean-burn and greatly assist.
__________________
2003 Renault Scenic - 30% more power with no loss in fuel economy.
1991 Toyota GT4 - more economical before ST215W engine-swap.
previous: Water-Injected Mitsubishi ~33% improved.
future - probably a Prius
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ar5boosted For This Useful Post:
Enki (06-13-2017)
Old 06-13-2017, 04:18 AM   #123 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
teoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 1,245

A3 - '12 Audi A3
Thanks: 65
Thanked 225 Times in 186 Posts
And were you able to measure FE gains?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2017, 04:37 PM   #124 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
ar5boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Sydney
Posts: 110
Thanks: 8
Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by teoman View Post
And were you able to measure FE gains?
Yes. Constantly.

Remember about five years ago when there was a gas price spike? here we were paying $1.60 per litre and not the $1.10-$1.30 per litre that we pay now.

I just measured per fill. The tank was too big to fill, ie 100 litres or $160, no thanks to that.

So it would range from 9L/100km to 11L/100km instead of 14L/100km without the Water-Injection running. I had the vehicle for a few years, it wasn't a one off.

__________________
2003 Renault Scenic - 30% more power with no loss in fuel economy.
1991 Toyota GT4 - more economical before ST215W engine-swap.
previous: Water-Injected Mitsubishi ~33% improved.
future - probably a Prius
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ar5boosted For This Useful Post:
teoman (06-13-2017)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com