10-22-2010, 01:41 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
aero guerrilla
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,746
Thanks: 1,325
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurentiu
Oh, gosh, it was rattling about a lot, huh ?  but Fiat has worked hard to eliminate vibration on the TwinAir.
126p engine sound/rattling about  |
The engine in that video is pretty quiet and tame, compared to what I've seen in rural areas...
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be
What matters is where you're going, not how fast.
"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell
[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
10-22-2010, 01:55 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurentiu
Fiat's 500 Twin Air is quite a remarkable little car.
And the most important aspect, Fuel Economy....4.0 l/100 km (about 60MPG)
|
All tests I've read mention a disappointing FE:
Some 40 mpg rather than 60.
Autogids.be managed 28.7 mpg on a short test - they got carried away by the rev-happy engine.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side
|
|
|
|
|
10-22-2010, 02:10 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Hypermiling rookie
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Limassol , CY
Posts: 288
Thanks: 17
Thanked 36 Times in 21 Posts
|
Most cars will have a disappointing MPG if they're not driven in a efficient manner. But I know what you mean, fuel efficiency test in Europe are NOT as accurate or as honest as the US EPA testing. Anyway, I'm curios as to what numbers the 500's imported in the US will have (EPA)
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2010, 01:22 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 659
Thanks: 20
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
Yes but i'm not at liberty to divulge where, when, or whos it was or why it was anywhere near me 
unfortuneately you can't make out the idle 'shiver' on the video
__________________
-----------------------------------------
good things come to those who wait, sh*t turns up pretty much instantly
twitter.com/bertchalmers
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2010, 02:25 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Briggsdale, Colorado
Posts: 296
Thanks: 3
Thanked 31 Times in 14 Posts
|
A 2 cyl Fiat would great in the US, but because of the car manufacturers' idea of what Americans want, they will try to shoehorn some V8 somethin-er-other in it. I hope they stick a few of these 2 bangers on the lots and see how they sell. Although I'd prefer not to have a turbo on it.
|
|
|
|
|
10-24-2010, 10:50 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
home of the odd vehicles
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 506
Thanked 867 Times in 654 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurentiu
Oh, gosh, it was rattling about a lot, huh ? but Fiat has worked hard to eliminate vibration on the TwinAir.
126p engine sound/rattling about
Which model do you have ? The Sambar , R2 or the 360/450 ? |
A 1970 subaru 360 sedan. Nice little car but I keep plugging darn fuel filters which on gravity feed is nerve racking.
Cheers
Ryan |
|
|
|
|
10-25-2010, 01:25 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Polymorphic Modder
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 307
Thanks: 188
Thanked 40 Times in 25 Posts
|
Since Fiat bought Chrysler we may see this engine in a few small cars. Like maybe offer the 2 cylinder in a Dodge Viper?
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2010, 07:50 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Hypermiling rookie
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Limassol , CY
Posts: 288
Thanks: 17
Thanked 36 Times in 21 Posts
|
ya, sure , lets's say 4000 cc each ? |
|
|
|
|
10-25-2010, 08:18 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 659
Thanks: 20
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
try and damp out that!!!
__________________
-----------------------------------------
good things come to those who wait, sh*t turns up pretty much instantly
twitter.com/bertchalmers
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2010, 01:46 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 99metro
...I hope they stick a few of these 2 bangers on the lots and see how they sell. Although I'd prefer not to have a turbo on it.
|
I don't think they'd even try to sell it without the turbo. And I'm glad they won't, because they would have to up the displacement of the engine to maintain the (perceived) needed performance. At least with the turbo, you can have the basic engine be smaller for the same performance level. Which means that you can drive it in a non-sporty fashion and still pull good FE numbers out of it.
The NVH problem appears to be pretty significant, though. I'm all for smaller engines, but I think two cylinders may be too few for decent comfort in a vehicle with a reasonable (read: light) weight. The three cylinder engines can, if I recall correctly, be made pretty smooth. (Six-cylinder engines even more so, at least for non-shared-journal six-cylinders, but those aren't usually done as fuel-efficient motors anyway.)
-soD
|
|
|
|
|
