Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Introductions
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-26-2011, 10:47 PM   #21 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: southern indiana
Posts: 126
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
welcome to em
appears to me your more of a gearhead then a modder (your not alone )
the best think i can recommend is slow down a bit set your cruz speed at 60 i think you will have more money to put in the old cutlass

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-26-2011, 11:32 PM   #22 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Nonhog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Pacific N/W
Posts: 55
Thanks: 11
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Yes I am a gearhead 1st! No issues there. However I drive smoothly and calmly. I do try (and with a fair amount of effort) to get the best mpg I can.
I've been a slacker about doing anything to my truck.
Many other projects. Been using Mobile 1 oil 0w-30 and it seemed to make no difference. No surprise. I'm torn between leveling the truck(lowering the back 2-3" or complete lower. Thats another item that won't upset me if it shows no big gain. Getting too old to jump off the tailgate of this thing, it sits so high. From what I've researched its probably not a good engine to supercharge due to the limited EFI system. I swear the V8's got a mile or two better than the six but maybe I was wrong?
Either way Its been almost 3 years as a daily driver and I'm getting about 18
avg. Yet to see a 20mpg tank and boy have I tried.
Now its winter and I just installed winter tires and my mileage has dropped to high 17's Had a few high 19's. Was hopping for a 20 before any mods but what the hey.
Thanks for the reply's
__________________
attempting best possible MPG from my odd fleet of vehicles.

1996 GMC Safari
1999 Toyota Avalon
80 Volvo Bertone 5.0 Ford powered
(66 Volvo Amazon estate
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2011, 10:18 PM   #23 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: southern indiana
Posts: 126
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
maybe a new air filter and air inlet like those little riceburners run
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 06:14 PM   #24 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
bhazard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 500

2012 Golf TDI - '12 Volkswagen Golf TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 45.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 34 Times in 27 Posts
Wow they still used the 4.3 in 2008? That has to be close to 25 years or so for that engine.

Definitely slow down. If you stayed at 55-60 no doubt you would have 20 mpg. Lowering would help a lot too, that thing is all jacked up.
__________________
'05 Outback XT, 19 mpg

BP-turbo 93 Festiva (long gone)
1/4 mile - 12.50@111.5
Best MPG - 36.8
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 10:29 PM   #25 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 506
Thanked 867 Times in 654 Posts
I've gotten 22mpg with an Auto 5.2 v8 dodge 1500, trust me, If I can do it in that thing you can definately do it in your infinately better GM.

If its a 2wd put small tires on the front end (I did with my dodge and it really helped, I think the loss of height was the reason that and they were LRR)

Things I have been considering are
1. Aero topper
2. Plenum gasket (shouldn't apply to you)
3. MT swap

I would estimate the best thing you could do would be an MT swap, it takes patience but remember the 700r4 and NV3500 were the same dimensions and XMBR wise, I would estimate with a bit of visual inspection you would find your XMSN and a MT counterpart might be drop in replacements.

I am right now waiting on getting me 89 diesel sub converted to double overdrive MT. I will actually need grandma gear to take off.

Something else you can do but everybody here hates is to reprogram the ECU the hard way using some of the freeware ECM utilities and move your maps past stoich in your highway cruise region (if you cruise on the highway a fair amount) thats good for about 2-4mpg in of itself. You need a good bit of tuning knowledge and patience to pull it off properly though.

Just make sure you can flop back and forth.

Good Luck
Ryan
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2011, 08:01 PM   #26 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703 View Post
Something else you can do but everybody here hates is to reprogram the ECU the hard way using some of the freeware ECM utilities and move your maps past stoich in your highway cruise region (if you cruise on the highway a fair amount) thats good for about 2-4mpg in of itself. You need a good bit of tuning knowledge and patience to pull it off properly though.

Just make sure you can flop back and forth.

Good Luck
Ryan
What's the scoop on this freeware ECU tuning?

I've looked at a service to reprogram the ECU for my '03 Silverado. One that caught my eye claims 1-3mpg improvement (Not much on a Prius, huge on a full size truck). The thing that has stopped me is cost. $200+ for a mod that may or may not improve efficiency. A free utility to play with sounds interesting, but you still need a ECU -> PC interface of some sort...

Mike
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2011, 09:05 PM   #27 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 506
Thanked 867 Times in 654 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by darcane View Post
What's the scoop on this freeware ECU tuning?

I've looked at a service to reprogram the ECU for my '03 Silverado. One that caught my eye claims 1-3mpg improvement (Not much on a Prius, huge on a full size truck). The thing that has stopped me is cost. $200+ for a mod that may or may not improve efficiency. A free utility to play with sounds interesting, but you still need a ECU -> PC interface of some sort...

Mike
You are more or less completely and utterly on your own is the scoop.

Those services may or may not work and the price is obviously not very good.

The megasquirt and other options that are controlled by you are also not real cheap.

If you do it yourself completely you need to understand the binary portion of the rom, how to make it into a human readable thing, how to identify its parts and how to modify it.

Generally you will also need a computer, a soldering/desoldering iron, nerves of steel *******izing and putting a socket in your ECM and a ROM reader for the PC.

I failed when I tried that route so I am little help, also remember each vehicle and motor varient has its own club and potential utilities, a google search might help.

Oh and if you do it yourself it voids any warranty you may have.

Cheers
Ryan
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2011, 10:41 PM   #28 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: saskatoon
Posts: 13
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nonhog View Post
Yes I am a gearhead 1st! No issues there. However I drive smoothly and calmly. I do try (and with a fair amount of effort) to get the best mpg I can.
I've been a slacker about doing anything to my truck.
Many other projects. Been using Mobile 1 oil 0w-30 and it seemed to make no difference. No surprise. I'm torn between leveling the truck(lowering the back 2-3" or complete lower. Thats another item that won't upset me if it shows no big gain. Getting too old to jump off the tailgate of this thing, it sits so high. From what I've researched its probably not a good engine to supercharge due to the limited EFI system. I swear the V8's got a mile or two better than the six but maybe I was wrong?
Either way Its been almost 3 years as a daily driver and I'm getting about 18
avg. Yet to see a 20mpg tank and boy have I tried.
Now its winter and I just installed winter tires and my mileage has dropped to high 17's Had a few high 19's. Was hopping for a 20 before any mods but what the hey.
Thanks for the reply's
if you are gonna spend the money on a synthetic oil go with amsoil....dollar for dollar the best oil out there
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2011, 11:02 PM   #29 (permalink)
halos.com
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 528

ECONORAM - '07 Dodge RAM 1500 QC SLT flex-fuel
90 day: 18.16 mpg (US)

the Avenger - '08 Dodge Avenger SXT
90 day: 27.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 385
Thanked 94 Times in 80 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to ECONORAM
Here is a site I used for some of my initial ideas for FE improvement:
A Truck That Drinks Less Than a Car? | Popular Science
Just doing the panels outlined in this article will benefit you. I am, and can get 20 mpg nearly at will once the truck hits 4th gear. My truck is rated 14/19.
Make sure your front end alignment is correct. I discovered mine has been out of whack for a year?! Boy is that frustrating.
Lowering your truck will also help, but not dramatically. It does reduce the drag coefficient. Synthetics also help, but the kicker is reducing your truck's Cd. Speed (velocity) is the enemy, as drag increases with speed squared, not just directly with speed. See the drag equation, rearranged to solve for your Cd:
The Drag Coefficient
Drag = (1/2)*Rho*Cd*A*V*V where Rho (I don't have the greek letter key) is air density, Cd is your drag coefficient, A is your frontal area, and V is your speed (or velocity).
The factors you can really change are your speed/velocity and Cd.
As you can see, the faster we go the drag increases dramatically. My truck has a 0.52 Cd, and with 32 sq ft of frontal area (A), I am in a world of hurt for drag. I suspect your truck isn't that much better than mine.
Here's another page to look at: Drag Force Calculation and Equations. Drag Coefficients.

[edit] rmay, when my alignment was on track I hit 24 mpg driving across northern Utah on I-80, so I agree, GMs are typically better on aero than Dodges, especially my Gen3. GM has an aeronautical engineer working high in their company, so I am sure he is influencing things...

Last edited by ECONORAM; 02-03-2011 at 11:05 PM.. Reason: mpg claim
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2011, 11:09 PM   #30 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Re: that Pop Sci bit: Wow. Just... wow. Aside from the pickup aero info (good), their "test" and their premise is complete crap.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
improving mpg's with led taillights? GenX Rolla EcoModding Central 38 11-03-2022 12:03 AM
Newb - better MPGs out of a Dodge Neon? stevewww EcoModding Central 7 10-21-2011 09:50 AM
MPG's or Drive Less? DifferentPointofView EcoModding Central 13 06-22-2009 01:32 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com