Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Introductions
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-12-2010, 03:36 PM   #11 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nonhog View Post
a shame the little engine gets worse MPG's than the V8's
Is this a fact? EPA ratings?

Welcome to the site. There's lots you can do to the truck & your driving to improve.

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-12-2010, 05:13 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 362

Tank - '76 Chevy El Camino Classic
90 day: 25.89 mpg (US)

Sabrina - '91 Mercedes Benz 190 E
90 day: 37.07 mpg (US)

Angel - '88 Mercedes-Benz 420SEL
Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US)

Quicksilver - '04 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG Cabrio
Thanks: 52
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RH77 View Post
Agreed. A carefully tuned supercharger or turbo might help, but forced induction + larger displacement (with "fun" added to the equation) only spells more fuel.

The WT has the most potential of the Chevy lineup with stripped-down options (less weight), V-6, and I'm guessing a manual trans.

Modding and driving efficiently for highway speeds and using momentum to your advantage could yield results.

Stick with it and see what happens

RH77
That's what i meant a tuned turbo setup running between 3-6 Psi might help

Something like an STS rear turbo mount or another brand if it would work better . Don't really know the difference between them

By fun u just meant a little more power when you really wanted to open it up sorry if i was unclear about that
__________________


Tank:
(No actual EPA numbers for car just used F/E numbers when i first got it)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 05:24 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,123

The Geo - '93 Geo Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 45.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 30
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
Is this a fact? EPA ratings?
Usually the bigger engine in trucks are geared lower and allow the big torquey engine to turn slower and makes for better MPG than a slighter lower geared smaller engine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 05:26 PM   #14 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RH77 View Post
Agreed. A carefully tuned supercharger or turbo might help, but forced induction + larger displacement (with "fun" added to the equation) only spells more fuel.

RH77
Care to explain how this would work? I've never heard of a supercharger especially increasing FE.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 08:37 PM   #15 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wi.
Posts: 75
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Get the biggest block heater you can find, this helps in faster warm ups. Make sure the tune-up parts are good. Make sure the thermostat is the correct temp. You can loose 2 mpg or more if your eng. is running 175* instead of 195* oem range. I run a 205* t-stat year round, there not avaliable for all engines though. Remove unnesesary weight, I see alot of people haulling a bunch of stuff around thats usless. When the engine is cool take it easy on the gas, efi engines dont have chokes so the injectors flow alot more fuel durning cold operation. Hope this helps ya.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2010, 09:32 PM   #16 (permalink)
Pishtaco
 
SentraSE-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485

Mean Green Toaster Machine - '06 Scion xB
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
Slow down. I had an Astro van with the 4.3 V-6. It got 15-17 mpg at 70 mph, but 22 mpg at 62 mph.
__________________
Darrell

Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2010, 03:31 AM   #17 (permalink)
Depends on the Day
 
RH77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,761

Teggy - '98 Acura Integra LS
Sports Cars
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)

IMA - '10 Honda Insight EX
Team Honda
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)

Tessie - '06 Acura TSX Base
90 day: 28.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 41 Times in 35 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
Care to explain how this would work? I've never heard of a supercharger especially increasing FE.
Thinking out loud...

In theory it might work like a mild turbo, by offering additional power at lower RPMs. In this case, taller gearing / final drive would be required (and some sort of ability to regulate the boost). The thought of a supercharger for engines of higher displacement comes to mind instead of a turbo (except for Diesels). I recall hearing of a zero-boost CRX a few years ago that yielded exceptional FE. The SC could be flawed logic...

Thinking more about it, the parasitic drag of a belt-driven device may not offset the gains. Luckily, easier methods are available to start with first

RH77
__________________
“If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research” ― Albert Einstein

_
_
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 09:51 PM   #18 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nonhog View Post
We'll its true I am a V8 lover, gotta love that big block torque !
My DD is a pick up. Its an 08 Silverado 4.3 WT. Pretty happy with it but its a shame the little engine gets worse MPG's than the V8's I understand lots of factors involved. Couldn't afford the LS V8's so moot point.
I have yet (but I will !) get 20 MPG in the silly thing.
I am sure your web site will help ! Not interested in driving in any way that may upset or endanger anyone else.

So my first step is;
* Synthetic oil and I hope it helps but wont be upset if it does'nt.

*Looking at my mirrors and thinking

*Thinking about a bed cover/canopy mod (went through 27 pages of that canopy thread *awesome*)

My truck sits azz high and have heard that lowering it to level has helped
others?

Wouldn't mind turbocharging someday, have heard the fuel economy is there
if you can keep your foot out of it.

Have lots of questions but I'll save them till I've searched more.
Dang, those trucks sit high... looks 4-6 inches taller than my '03.

When you wear down your tires, look at ditching the steelies and getting some smoother, lighter, aluminum wheels. Lots of stock take offs that you can find on craigslist cheap, usually with tires.

Slow down. Buy an Ultragauge.

I also coast in Neutral which seems to help.
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 09:57 PM   #19 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
Is this a fact? EPA ratings?

Welcome to the site. There's lots you can do to the truck & your driving to improve.
for '08, the EPA rates the 4.3L V6 the same as the 5.3L V8 (15/20) which is slightly better than the middle choice of a 4.8L V8 (14/19). These trucks are pretty heavy though... 4400+ for the lightest version.
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 09:58 PM   #20 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RH77 View Post
The WT has the most potential of the Chevy lineup with stripped-down options (less weight), V-6, and I'm guessing a manual trans.
GM (Ford and Dodge too) no longer offers manuals in their 1500 series trucks. I think '06 was the last year it was available, and even then they were rare. I searched for months trying to find one before I gave up.

Mike

__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
improving mpg's with led taillights? GenX Rolla EcoModding Central 38 11-03-2022 12:03 AM
Newb - better MPGs out of a Dodge Neon? stevewww EcoModding Central 7 10-21-2011 09:50 AM
MPG's or Drive Less? DifferentPointofView EcoModding Central 13 06-22-2009 01:32 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com