Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Instrumentation
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-25-2014, 03:13 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Las Vegas, nv
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
vacuum Gauge confusion

So I installed a vacuum Gauge in my 89 vw fox sedan 1.8 8v 4speed with cis-e mechanical fuel injection. When the car is fully warmed up and idling at 1k rpm the vacuum gauge shows 22 units (I don't know what vacuum is measured in). When driving I try to accelerate only letting the gauge drop to 10 at the lowest and my cruising goal is 20 but sometimes the car loses power to overcome a hill so my cruise will drop to 15 till I reach my desired speed.

Something funky is that in 4th gear the car can hit 20units at both 32mph/1500rpm and 45mph/2100rpm, of course the car is more capable of taking the hills at 45mph/2100rpm, and at the low rpm I have to drop the vacuum to 10 just to overcome the smallest inclines. My question is which speed is more fuel saving? Any tips you guys have as well?

27mpg before gauge and techniques, 30mpg after gauge, I need to hit 35mpg to make my daily commute cost $10 exact. There are a lot of unavoidable hills and stops in my commute as well.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-25-2014, 01:01 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 40.02 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
I would guess there are a few sliding scales of drag and efficiency going on inside the engine, and you have two different scales experiencing their best values at those two speeds in that gear.

I can't remember where I read it but I've seen it stated that ~1200fpm is the optimum cylinder travel speed inside an engine (can't find the resource now), but maybe you're getting better airflow at the other speed - whichever one it is. Different factors combine here and there, sometimes to add to each other, or cancel out or subtract from each other.

And those units are inches of mercury.
__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.

Last edited by elhigh; 09-25-2014 at 03:28 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2014, 01:26 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,012

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 41.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 465 Times in 286 Posts
The units are inches of mercury, usually abbreviated In Hg.

It's possible that the timing is significantly retarded at 1500 RPM compared to 2100 RPM for emissions purposes. In that case, the torque COULD be less for the same fuel burned. If so, the higher speed should get better mileage. Maybe. You would need to drive one way for a tank, the other way for the next tank, and repeat until you saw a clear pattern to know for sure.

The largest benefit of a vacuum gauge is as a guide to minimize the range from the lowest to highest vacuum that you use when driving a particular route. The steadier you control the gas pedal, the better your gas mileage. Except for accelerating, sometimes you are better off to just step on it and go.

If you can borrow a portable fuel air ratio meter, find the fuel air ratio vs vacuum. Rich mixtures give a little more power by burning a lot more fuel. Then try to stay below the fuel enrichment vacuum.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2014, 04:53 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: World
Posts: 385
Thanks: 82
Thanked 82 Times in 67 Posts
The premise behind watching manifold pressure/vacuum is to increase engine efficiency. That's not the same as the absolute quantity of fuel being used.

That manifold vacuum drops when climbing a hill, at least without getting into enrichment, is a good thing. Low(er) engine speed and low manifold vacuum/high manifold pressure reduces two of the sources of wasted work within the engine.

For insight, find a BSFC map that also has lines of constant power on it and you can trace the effects of engine rpm - determined by gearing for a given road speed - vs manifold pressure for the given power output required to maintain that road speed.

Sometimes it's possible to trade off the increased vehicle drag associated with a higher road speed against the benefit of the engine operating at a higher efficiency combination of load (manifold pressure) and rpm. That can mean even though the power requirement is higher, the quantity of fuel used is similar or lower.

Knowing if you are in enrichment or not is really useful. There are any number of simple LM3914 based gauges that will show you that at very low cost. The circuit I described and provided a schematic for, for indicating TPS or MAP voltage on a string of LEDs is based on one. For an O2 sensor application, merely delete the 330k resistor that is part of the voltage divider for the TPS or MAP input.

The components for that are ~$20. Alternatively find one of the pre-packaged kits for only a little more or an assembled version for about twice that.

With the vacuum gauge and O2 LED meter, aim for the lowest possible vacuum achievable without losing the closed loop oscillation on the LEDs i.e. without entering into the enrichment. Just when that occurs will vary with rpm and load.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Occasionally6 For This Useful Post:
j12piprius (09-27-2014)
Old 09-28-2014, 06:18 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by elhigh View Post
I would guess there are a few sliding scales of drag and efficiency going on inside the engine, and you have two different scales experiencing their best values at those two speeds in that gear.

I can't remember where I read it but I've seen it stated that ~1200fpm is the optimum cylinder travel speed inside an engine (can't find the resource now), but maybe you're getting better airflow at the other speed - whichever one it is. Different factors combine here and there, sometimes to add to each other, or cancel out or subtract from each other.

And those units are inches of mercury.
Your resource is the MIA Frank Lee.

regards
mech
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to user removed For This Useful Post:
Cobb (09-28-2014), elhigh (09-28-2014)
Old 09-28-2014, 06:35 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
I believe the CIS VWs have a secondary throttle and that maybe opening causing the vacuum drop.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2014, 09:34 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 40.02 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
Frank's page is live, he's just not participating at this time. I've been keeping my eyes peeled.
__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2014, 01:06 PM   #8 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
Is this the Frank Lee page that you are thinking about?

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...peed-1477.html
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gone-ot For This Useful Post:
elhigh (09-29-2014)
Old 09-29-2014, 01:46 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 40.02 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
^^Yup.

Tele-man's search-fu is the best. I didn't realize that I was in fact repeating Frank's own question. <facepalm> But RH77 came back with a reference to put some foundation under that house of cards, so it's all good.

Now, must strain non-engineer brain to understand all the big words...
__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2014, 02:37 PM   #10 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by elhigh View Post
Now, must strain non-engineer brain to understand all the big words...
BIG words are just lots of little words all-strung-together (ala' German language)...ha,ha!

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com