Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-28-2008, 09:17 AM   #51 (permalink)
METROANNOSAURUS REX
 
FunkSkunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marble, NC
Posts: 121

The Mach .05 - '98 Chevy Metro LSi
90 day: 48.88 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
The off-road industry uses a lot of bias-ply tires solely because of their durable nature (fights sharp rocks) and flexibility (better traction when aired down). Interco Tires is one of the best at this esoteric group. Gas mileage is not a priority with an off-road only vehicle. Most of the time these are only wheeled on the trails on the weekends for only 20 or so miles so the impact on gas mileage is not as important as performance.

__________________

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-14-2009, 05:11 PM   #52 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Neat test ... but....

Quote:
Originally Posted by LostCause View Post
I don't know if a thread has been put up on the topic yet, but I know people have recommended them before. I don't remember if it was on GS or here, but someone put extremely skinny tires on their vx. 155/85/13 if I remember correctly.

Ofcourse you lose traction/stopping ability, though. I think a bigger question is what is a better choice: a wider LRR tire or a skinnier normal tire?

Good work, though.

- LostCause
If pressure is a factor ... was the pressure checked / set equal in all tires? This may be one reason the "skinnies" showed better MPG - they're rated at 60 psi. Did they have more than the street tires ?? -CHEM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 02:08 PM   #53 (permalink)
Building the future! :-)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: orlando
Posts: 177
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
I know its been a while but have any of the "temp tire test cars" racked up enough miles to speak to the durability of temp spares over more miles then they were intended for?
Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 08:34 PM   #54 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Peakster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Regina SK Canada
Posts: 407

Red Jeep Patriot - '07 Jeep Patriot
90 day: 25.14 mpg (US)

Beige Ford Ranger - '95 Ford Ranger XLE
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
The temporary spares did wear quicker than normal tires. The nice thing is that they can be picked up cheap at an auto-wrecker.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2010, 10:06 AM   #55 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 796
Thanks: 4
Thanked 393 Times in 240 Posts
I am surprised I haven't posted in this thread - but perhaps it is because it is so old.

Temporary spares (for cars) are designed to a standard with a lower margin of safety than the standard for regular car tires - as are the rims. That's the main reason for the warnings.

Further, temporary spares are manufactured to minimal quality standards - for obvious reasons.

While it it may be hard to believe, wider tires are frequently more efficient. Here's the background on that:

Barry's Tire Tech

Lastly, temporary spares are not designed nor manufactured with any consideration for fuel economy. If fuel economy is the goal, then a better bet would be to use a regular car tire that has been designed for fuel economy.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CapriRacer For This Useful Post:
MetroMPG (11-20-2010), rob.e (08-14-2019)
Old 11-20-2010, 11:00 AM   #56 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,528

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 62.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,977 Times in 3,613 Posts
Yet in this particular thread (Peakster's A-B comparison with donuts vs. regular tires on the rear), he found a fairly large efficiency improvement.

Though not knowing the RR characteristics of the regular tires, it's obviously not something one could extrapolate to every vehicle. And methodology is debatable as always.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2011, 03:17 AM   #57 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
orange4boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The Wet Coast, Kanuckistan.
Posts: 1,275

The Golden Egg - '93 Toyota Previa DX
90 day: 31.91 mpg (US)

Chewie - '03 Toyota Prius
90 day: 57 mpg (US)

The Spaceship - '00 Honda Insight
Thanks: 100
Thanked 306 Times in 178 Posts
Hucho has two references to lower CD from narrower tires.

Figure 4.117 on page 281 shows .31 for 195mm tires and .29 for 166mm on the same car

Figure 5.72 on page 295 shows a drop from .32 with 225/55/15 down to .29 for a 155 R 15

Those are some big CD changes.

Shows how GM's Volt Vs Prius CD comparison was set up in the Volt's favour by testing the Prius with 17" wheels instead of the base model's 15"
__________________
Vortex generators are old tech. My new and improved vortex alternators are unstoppable.

"It’s easy to explain how rockets work but explaining the aerodynamics of a wing takes a rocket scientist.


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2011, 03:50 AM   #58 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,747

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,327
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by orange4boy View Post
Hucho has two references to lower CD from narrower tires.

Figure 4.117 on page 281 shows .31 for 195mm tires and .29 for 166mm on the same car

Figure 5.72 on page 295 shows a drop from .32 with 225/55/15 down to .29 for a 155 R 15

Those are some big CD changes.

Shows how GM's Volt Vs Prius CD comparison was set up in the Volt's favour by testing the Prius with 17" wheels instead of the base model's 15"
Going from wide to narrow usually means that the tire is not as tall. Could the Cd change have been from the vehicle's body being slightly lower, closer to the ground?
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2011, 04:22 AM   #59 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
orange4boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The Wet Coast, Kanuckistan.
Posts: 1,275

The Golden Egg - '93 Toyota Previa DX
90 day: 31.91 mpg (US)

Chewie - '03 Toyota Prius
90 day: 57 mpg (US)

The Spaceship - '00 Honda Insight
Thanks: 100
Thanked 306 Times in 178 Posts
In the test results shown for the second reference above, the tire heights are similar. There is a progression of aspect ratios to maintain ride height so the test does isolate the effect of the tire width to CD:

Figure 5.72 on page 295 shows a drop from .32 with 225/55/15 down to .29 for a 155 R 15

The other reference (fig. 4.117) does not specify the aspect ratios.
__________________
Vortex generators are old tech. My new and improved vortex alternators are unstoppable.

"It’s easy to explain how rockets work but explaining the aerodynamics of a wing takes a rocket scientist.


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2011, 10:27 PM   #60 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: usa
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think that most of this has to do with rolling resistance, the skinny the tire and the more air it has in the the smaller the contct patch

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com