Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-24-2013, 01:22 PM   #81 (permalink)
EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Central Alabama
Posts: 572

Big Salsa - '04 Toyota Sienna LE

Silver - '10 Toyota Prius III
Thanks: 110
Thanked 123 Times in 71 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NachtRitter View Post
Anybody have a graphic that shows how the engine cooling works? From the article, it sounds like the cooling comes from underneath and exits at the top of the engine. I realize none of the graphics that I've seen so far show a radiator... (or I missed it).
It's possible that there is no radiator, and it's just an air cooled engine, in the same spirit as the old rear-engine VW Bugs.

__________________

Last edited by wyatt; 05-24-2013 at 01:39 PM.. Reason: I now understand :)
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-24-2013, 01:58 PM   #82 (permalink)
NightKnight
 
NachtRitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Placerville, CA
Posts: 1,595

Helga - '00 Volkswagen Jetta TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
Diesel
90 day: 51.85 mpg (US)

Mathilde - '99 Volkswagen Eurovan Camper
90 day: 16.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 314 Times in 187 Posts
Hmmm... possible, but I'd be surprised if that were the case... image of the engine (assuming it is relatively accurate) don't show the cooling fins that (I would expect) would be necessary for an air-cooled engine, and the article indicates the engine is half the 1.6-liter TDI used in the Euro-only Golf, which is not air-cooled. ... unless they are only saying the displacement is half... hmmm
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2013, 06:49 PM   #83 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
And air-cooled engines do not cool consistently enough to minimize emissions. Plus it is actually harder to get cooling air into all of the places you would want it in an engine. Remember, Porsche didn't go to four-valve heads until they went water-cooled. A few motorcycle engines did go with four-valve air-cooled heads, but motorcycles are not cars and the set of constraints they operate under is different.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2013, 02:45 AM   #84 (permalink)
kah
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Denmark
Posts: 33

The Mii - '12 Seat Mii Reference
90 day: 54.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
It is actually fairly simple, there are two air ducts on the car (parallel to each other and right below the upper rear led brake light), underneath there are on or two electrical fans pushing air down to the radiator.
VW-XL1-Live-25
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2013, 03:04 AM   #85 (permalink)
NightKnight
 
NachtRitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Placerville, CA
Posts: 1,595

Helga - '00 Volkswagen Jetta TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
Diesel
90 day: 51.85 mpg (US)

Mathilde - '99 Volkswagen Eurovan Camper
90 day: 16.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 314 Times in 187 Posts
The article is claiming that the ducts on top are the air exit ducts... and in the photos of the fan, there is no radiator visible under the fan.
Quote:
But the air coming out of the rear diffuser beneath the bumper isn’t going out, it’s going up. VW managed to channel the air out the splitter, through the engine compartment and then suck it out through a top-mounted fan. It’s a concession to the Gods of aerodynamics that wouldn’t work with massive side ducts like you’d seen on the 911 Turbo.
If the engine is water-cooled, and if the air flow is exiting at the top, then I would expect the radiator to be located at (near) the entrance of the air, toward the bottom of the engine.


It is hard to tell in this pic what the 3 blue-capped reservoirs are for, but if you look between the fan and the blue cap on the bottom left, it looks like there *might* be a radiator way down in there. That, and the shape of the fan blades does seem to indicate that the air flow is coming upwards...

Last edited by NachtRitter; 05-25-2013 at 03:58 AM.. Reason: More info
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2013, 03:12 AM   #86 (permalink)
NightKnight
 
NachtRitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Placerville, CA
Posts: 1,595

Helga - '00 Volkswagen Jetta TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
Diesel
90 day: 51.85 mpg (US)

Mathilde - '99 Volkswagen Eurovan Camper
90 day: 16.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 314 Times in 187 Posts
SAE article describing the XL1. It indicates that the diesel alone (without electrical assist) will consume only 2.1L/100km (112mpg).
Hyper-efficient VW XL1 drives to production
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2013, 06:01 AM   #87 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,882
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,684 Times in 1,502 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by some_other_dave View Post
And air-cooled engines do not cool consistently enough to minimize emissions.
Air-cooled Diesel engines are harder to control NOx emissions, and can't get a cooled EGR.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cRiPpLe_rOoStEr For This Useful Post:
some_other_dave (05-26-2013)
Old 05-27-2013, 01:45 PM   #88 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NachtRitter View Post
SAE article describing the XL1. It indicates that the diesel alone (without electrical assist) will consume only 2.1L/100km (112mpg).
Hyper-efficient VW XL1 drives to production
This picture says a lot:

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2013, 02:33 PM   #89 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I'll point out one thing that does happen rarely, but happens nonetheless: when the rear track is significantly different from the front track, on a soft dirt road the rear end will hunt from side to side as one rear tire then the other goes into the front tires' ruts. OMG for annoying!
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2013, 03:08 PM   #90 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NachtRitter View Post
SAE article describing the XL1. It indicates that the diesel alone (without electrical assist) will consume only 2.1L/100km (112mpg).
So there is the number I have been wondering about. It seems the 260 mpgUS number that has been promoted is some kind of voodoo number combining unaccounted for wall power like the Chevy volt fans always love to quote. The XL1 will really get only 112 mpgUS on a long trip as the Volt gets 40. A pregen Insight can get 66 with decades old technology and was apparently cheap at less than half the price.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com