10-13-2017, 05:40 PM
|
#101 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,882
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,684 Times in 1,502 Posts
|
Makes me wonder what would be the effects of either replacing the EGR flow entirely with some water injection for the sake of emissions control, or eventually adding a secondary injector specifically to cool it down a little further, since it's still quite hot even after going through the stock EGR cooler.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
10-13-2017, 08:28 PM
|
#102 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ivins UT
Posts: 213
Thanks: 2
Thanked 24 Times in 22 Posts
|
I was thinking of taking a 4 inch pvc pipe in a sideways v shape filled with water along the front of my bed with a line from the exhaust running through it and bubbling out the very bottom of the system and goes back to the top of the system through the water so that it becomes a egr cooler/filter/water steamer system for the car!?!
|
|
|
10-13-2017, 09:50 PM
|
#103 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Colorado
Posts: 102
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
|
My 98 and 99 dodge diesels don't have egr, but I think the new diesels have water cooled egr. In my view, the egr is a poor smog control device. Maybe someone can educate me on the benifits. It cools the combustion therefore reduces the nitrogen oxides, but at the same time increases the hc output (aka unburned fuel). Eco mods should have the main goal of useing all the fuel you send through the motor. I see hc co2 and co as the main source of air pollution. It doesn't seem to me that no no2 no3 or whatever the nitrogen oxides that come out the tailpipe are constitute pollution. What happens to them when they get broken up by uv in the upper atmosphere? The free nitrogen or free oxygen will not be harmfull to anything. The chemistry might be beyond my understanding though.
|
|
|
10-14-2017, 11:48 AM
|
#104 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Yes EGR (on a diesel only) reduces power, fuel economy, warmup time and NOx, while it increases HC, CO and soot production.
I say if you don't live in a NOx and PM area then delete the emissions control stuff.
The worse part is the diesel particulate filter regen. Ford claims on their first generation of DPF equipped trucks that DPF regeneration can burn up to 17L of fuel.
I work with people who have newer dodge diesels and have deleted the emissions stuff, they said their fuel economy went from 15 to 20mpg up to 25 to 28mpg.
EGR on a gasoline engine is completely different, don't delete it. It normally gives you better fuel economy.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
10-14-2017, 12:18 PM
|
#105 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 1,245
Thanks: 65
Thanked 225 Times in 186 Posts
|
17L in how many miles or how much time?
That would be worth doing electric regeneration to burn it off.
|
|
|
10-14-2017, 12:21 PM
|
#106 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
How ever long it takes the DPF to need a regen.
From what I hear the regen cycle it's self burns fuel very rapidly.
It's got to get hot enough to ignite the diesel soot and burn it off.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
10-14-2017, 12:22 PM
|
#107 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Colorado
Posts: 102
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
|
It seems to me getting as close as you can to complete burn is a better approach than throwing that much fuel into the exhaust.
|
|
|
10-14-2017, 12:27 PM
|
#108 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 1,245
Thanks: 65
Thanked 225 Times in 186 Posts
|
Dayng, so if you have a 5 km commute and the dpf decides to do a regeneration consuming 17L for that trip your fuel consumption will be 340L / 100 km. Which is roughly equal to 0.7 mpg!!!!
|
|
|
10-14-2017, 12:31 PM
|
#109 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Colorado
Posts: 102
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
|
I think city driving generates more soot therefore requires more regen cycles.
|
|
|
10-14-2017, 12:38 PM
|
#110 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Short trips are especially bad for DPF. Ford had DPFs get so bad the vehicle wouldn't run.
But it should take more than a single 5km commute to cause the DPF to need a regen.
If you use the diesel truck like a diesel truck, pulling a big heavy trailer over mountians and stuff the DPF fuel drain isn't as bad.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
|