09-25-2017, 01:06 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 46
Thanks: 1
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
|
Your car would probably benefit more than most from aero mods. A lower grill block would be a good place to start with your car, and is a $5-10, 1-3 hour DIY job. In Scotland, you could probably run a full lower grill block on your car during the winter, and at least a partial lower grill block in the summer. I wouldn't recommend doing this without a scangauge or something to monitor coolant temps accurately.
__________________
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
09-25-2017, 02:09 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
The highway is where your mpg goes to die.
Backcountry roads are where it's at- the not stopping of highway driving with the low speeds and gliding opportunities of in town driving.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
09-25-2017, 03:28 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 654
Thanks: 36
Thanked 137 Times in 101 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr
What about its gearing? IIRC it was optimized for city traffic.
|
Most certainly. It is designed to be a city car. The new ones have 6 speed transmissions.
I am thinking of installing a lower grill block. I'll have to get off my butt and get it done.
Regarding country roads, I try and use them as much as possible. There is one 6 mile section I use often, and can get about 70 mpg UK, from one end to the other. I love that road. Short sharp climbs then long downgrades where DFCO comes to the fore. Needlessly to say, I only ever drive it in one direction!
Last edited by JockoT; 09-25-2017 at 03:37 PM..
|
|
|
09-25-2017, 09:07 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
|
It's been expained in pervous posts. As another data point I see only around 0.5l gain on the highway across my cars.
Further proof is that the Prius (which hypermiles itself) gets better city economy than highway.
For hypermilers, the gap between city and highway is very small.
|
|
|
09-26-2017, 01:16 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
Posts: 421
Thanks: 39
Thanked 96 Times in 69 Posts
|
I'll echo what everyone else is saying. I rarely go on the highway in the Echo, but when I do my mileage is at best the same as in town, and usually it is worse. Even in my Rondo which is generally a pig doing short trips in town, on a highway trip, I'll often see my mileage increase when I get into the city. I'd say if your getting highway mileage in the city, your doing it right.
__________________
Almost all my driving is done 1-5 miles at a time.
Best short trip: 2.4 l/100 km, 3.9 km
|
|
|
09-26-2017, 05:13 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,697 Times in 1,515 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by puddleglum
I rarely go on the highway in the Echo, but when I do my mileage is at best the same as in town, and usually it is worse. Even in my Rondo which is generally a pig doing short trips in town, on a highway trip, I'll often see my mileage increase when I get into the city.
|
With a smaller engine matched to a gearing that is shorter than the kick of a pig, having to be revved the hell out past its efficiency band in order to keep up with traffic speed, it gets harder to keep a reasonable fuel-efficiency. But anyway, most of the changes in MPG that I ever experienced driving a smaller (and most often underpowered) car in highway had not yet been worse than city mileage, even though that gap was quite narrow anyway.
|
|
|
09-27-2017, 01:22 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
Posts: 421
Thanks: 39
Thanked 96 Times in 69 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr
With a smaller engine matched to a gearing that is shorter than the kick of a pig, having to be revved the hell out past its efficiency band in order to keep up with traffic speed, it gets harder to keep a reasonable fuel-efficiency. But anyway, most of the changes in MPG that I ever experienced driving a smaller (and most often underpowered) car in highway had not yet been worse than city mileage, even though that gap was quite narrow anyway.
|
Highway speed limits here are way too fast for any kind of good mileage. I usually go as slow as I dare but I don't like to be a traffic hazard. Rondo has some mild aero mods. It does pretty well for it's size, provided I don't have to drive too fast. The Echo really is happiest as a city car for all the reasons you mention.
__________________
Almost all my driving is done 1-5 miles at a time.
Best short trip: 2.4 l/100 km, 3.9 km
|
|
|
09-27-2017, 03:17 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 654
Thanks: 36
Thanked 137 Times in 101 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr
With a smaller engine matched to a gearing that is shorter than the kick of a pig, having to be revved the hell out past its efficiency band in order to keep up with traffic speed
|
I never need to rev the hell out of my engine. 2,500 rpm is an indicated 55 mph, and even when accelerating, I seldom rev to 3,000 rpm, never mind above that.
|
|
|
09-27-2017, 11:46 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
I can do some vicious long distance sprints on the highway, but I can generally still see 36 mpg (US) for the trip even on a bad day. One mixed route I have to take in the summer (and in a rush) is 39 miles- 18 on "good" roads and 21 on the interstate. A good run there is 40-42 mpg.
So while I complain, they're not really bad numbers, considering. I'm just a lot happier over 50 mpg!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
09-27-2017, 11:53 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 654
Thanks: 36
Thanked 137 Times in 101 Posts
|
Me too. I am complaining because I am ONLY getting 55 mpg UK (46 mpg US). The Volvo I had previously did well to give me 28 mpg UK!
|
|
|
|