Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Off-Topic > The Lounge
Register Now
 Register Now
 


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-07-2022, 09:46 PM   #1 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,225
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
What do all of these words mean? :)

Something about capturing carbon in three minutes, so let's attach them to tailpipes, because people sometimes travel four miles in 180 seconds: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abo6849

__________________
"Oh if you use math, reason, and logic you will be hated."--OilPan4
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Xist For This Useful Post:
aerohead (08-08-2022)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-08-2022, 11:20 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,711
Thanks: 7,778
Thanked 8,586 Times in 7,070 Posts
I only got as far as the abstract. Scalable means it works best with big tailpipes.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2022, 01:18 PM   #3 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,225
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
I received a notification for a science report, which are often more reporting than actual science--editorializing? I understood the article, but questioned how accurate it was. It linked to this, the original article which I had difficulty understanding.

The easy-to-understand one also mentioned putting these on factories. Those aren't supposed to move, but their exhaust sure does, so I wonder how much it needs to absorb to be considered viable.

It absorbs the carbon and only releases it above a certain temperature. Would they periodically replace it or heat it up somewhere more convenient to capture carbon?

If it is the latter it just sounds like extra steps.
__________________
"Oh if you use math, reason, and logic you will be hated."--OilPan4
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2022, 01:29 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,895
Thanks: 23,972
Thanked 7,223 Times in 4,650 Posts
means

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
Something about capturing carbon in three minutes, so let's attach them to tailpipes, because people sometimes travel four miles in 180 seconds: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abo6849
Seems like they got so far, but had been constrained by the need to quantify certain aspect of the process, and succeeded in coming up with a novel way to capture this needed test data, which also happened to agree with the supercomputer mathematical model of the chemistry involved, at the most fundamental scale.
All of which gets us closer to industry-scale carbon capture and sequestration.
A very good thing!

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com