Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-20-2010, 01:51 PM   #11 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 794
Thanks: 4
Thanked 388 Times in 237 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clev View Post
Wouldn't LT tires have less sidewall flex on a lighter truck, giving increased mileage at the expense of ride quality?
The improvement in rolling resistance in a tire comes from the tread compound. Sidewall plays almost no role in what can be changed to affect RR.

But even when LT type tires start coming in LRR varieties, the fact that LT tires have high unit loading (high loads compared to the amount of space they occupy), P metric tires will always have better RR.

Based on the most recent study, larger tires have better RR. I know this sounds counter intuitive but that is what it says. I discuss this here:

http://www.barrystiretech.com/rrandfe2.html

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-20-2010, 02:53 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

RaceJeep - '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 13.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
Larger tires are less disturbed by small imperfections in the road, which makes sense for lower real-world rolling resistance. That, and taller effective gearing, combined with off-road use are why I upgraded my Jeep from the stock 225/70R16 tires to 245/70R16.

It had no noticeable effect around town (not a lot of extra weight, and taller effective gearing), and a fraction of an mpg gain on the highway at 60mph. The instant mpg on the overhead display reads the same as before most of the time (better RR, but worse aero), but when climbing steeper hills, it typically stays about 1mpg higher than it used to due to the taller effective gearing.

The effects will, however, vary from vehicle to vehicle. In my case, I think the primary reason I saw gains was due to the Jeep needing taller gearing on the highway (with current 3.73 axle gears and larger tires, it turns 1750 at 60mph and climbs any hill without downshifting).
__________________
Call me crazy, but I actually try for mpg with this Jeep:



Typical driving: Back in Rochester for school, driving is 60 - 70% city
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2010, 05:32 PM   #13 (permalink)
n00b.... sortof..
 
d0sitmatr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 345

silver fire - '03 Mazda Protege5
90 day: 32.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
if you have ever faced a blowout or tire separation at highway spds, you might reconsider over inflation
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2010, 05:55 PM   #14 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I have many times. It goes: flap flap flap flap flap... what's that sound?... FLAP FLAP FLAP... Oh yeah, blowout. Then I gently pull over and change it. No drama. At worst, cold fingers when it happens in winter.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
rmay635703 (10-21-2010)
Old 10-21-2010, 08:57 AM   #15 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
I've done it. No biggie. It was due to old tires, again. That was back in the day when I was running "normal" pressure (lower than placard due to neglect ).
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2010, 09:26 AM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Wonderboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 674

The Fruit Bat - '01 Honda Insight
Last 3: 54.26 mpg (US)

Current - '21 Subaru Impreza Wagon
90 day: 34.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 40
Thanked 39 Times in 27 Posts
Quote:
if you have ever faced a blowout or tire separation at highway spds, you might reconsider over inflation
Oh you mean YOUR highway speeds. If you're actually going the speed limit or slightly less it's just like Frankly says: "flap flap flap flap.....oh... I've got a flat." This just happened to me recently and coincidentally I was listening to Car Talk on NPR when it happened . I wouldn't advocate people to do things that make them feel unsafe, but I would advocate for people to gain perspective on what is and isn't safe - put your idea of safeness to the test every once and a while.

I just got both my cars inspected and I was running some junkyard tires on one of them - unacceptable to the inspector. So I just throw a couple of other, better looking junkyard tires on and it passed. I personally love recovering perfectly good stuff from being wastefully destroyed and embrace the recycle, reduce, reuse ethic. I'm glad I've got the personal patience enough to calmly change a tire when it blows out. There's something very cool calm and collected about most of the things I've learned here and practiced on the road - a zen feeling I never ever got before.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2010, 01:24 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Did any of these blow-outs happen in a fairly tight curve ?
Friend of mine had it happen : poof flap screech flap screech flap crash.

It was a worst case scenario though : outside front wheel blowing out
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2010, 01:36 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by d0sitmatr View Post
if you have ever faced a blowout or tire separation at highway spds, you might reconsider over inflation
What's over-inflation got to do with it? Under-inflation would be far more likely to cause blowouts. (Due to increased flexing and heat buildup.) But out here in the real world, every one of the few blowouts I've had has been caused by road debris puncturing the tire.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2010, 05:00 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Foothills near Denver
Posts: 279

RSX2fast4mpg - '02 Acura RSX Type S
90 day: 38.22 mpg (US)

bubbatrucker - '98 Chevrolet K1500
90 day: 18.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts
I agree that the risk produced by a blowout or other sudden deflation is a lot higher in an SUV or truck than it is in a low profile Honda Civic or other passenger car. I'm sure everyone remembers the fiasco Firestone went through because their product was used on a defective vehicle (a blown tire should not present a life threatening emergency and if it does, there's a design flaw with the vehicle, not the tire, but Ford's spin doctors got there first). In any case, you might want to look at the NTSB data on rollover rates for your vehicle just for reassurance. If there's a problem, I wouldn't run anything but the best Michelins your money will buy. If there's not a problem, it's because the vehicle was designed to handle problems like flat tires.

BTW, as a sidenote, before the Ford Explorer fiasco, Ford was up against the wall with the Bronco II, which had an even worse rollover record. At the time, the Bronco II was flipping at a rate of 22/100,000 while the Suzuki Samurai was catching all the heat with a rate of 6/100,000. Why? Ford quietly settled hundreds of law suits when the family bread winners were killed and the other spouse needed the settlement to make the mortgage payment. But since the Suzukis were $6,000 cars marketed toward teenagers, mom and dad were still working and they were pissed; thus more cases went to court. Only when the tire failures happened was Ford vulnerable because it was clear they were selling a defective product (the tires, of course).
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2010, 06:13 PM   #20 (permalink)
n00b.... sortof..
 
d0sitmatr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 345

silver fire - '03 Mazda Protege5
90 day: 32.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wonderboy View Post
Oh you mean YOUR highway speeds.
my highway speeds are most likely the same as yours, 70mph ?
you also might change your tune if you happened to have a 3 yr old (your only child) in the vehicle with you when it happens...
but hey, maybe not.

__________________
~Mike

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Top 5 most fuel efficient tires (Lowest Rolling resistance: LRR) blackjackel General Efficiency Discussion 144 01-25-2016 11:39 PM
Discussion on tire efficiency Ernie Rogers General Efficiency Discussion 69 12-27-2014 01:17 PM
Tips needed for eco-driving my diesel truck! nubbzcummins Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 65 12-07-2010 01:37 PM
Bridgestone Tires and LRR gone-ot EcoModding Central 30 05-04-2010 12:31 PM
New Wheels & Tires trikkonceptz Success Stories 9 11-03-2008 02:05 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com