Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-22-2010, 04:53 PM   #31 (permalink)
Pishtaco
 
SentraSE-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485

Mean Green Toaster Machine - '06 Scion xB
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
There's a huge difference between a front tire blowout and a rear tire blowout. Front blowouts are dangerous, causing your car to steer violently in the direction of the flat tire. Rear ones just cause your car to feel a little squirrely.

I've experienced flats/blowouts on all corners, in both cars and motorcycles. I'll bet money that those of you who say "tain't nothin'," all had rear flats.

__________________
Darrell

Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-22-2010, 06:57 PM   #32 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Nope. Last one I had was left front. Dint even swerve.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2010, 07:02 PM   #33 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I'd say that when a vehicle has such a high center of gravity that it's likely to roll over from a blown tire, then that's a design defect. Kinda like putting the Pinto's gas tank where it's likely to get punctured in rear-end collisions.
I wonder in how many of those "tire caused crashes" the vehicle was going 80 mph with 15 psi in the tires, with 900 lbs of crap in the back or better yet up on a rooftop carrier? And did the cell phone yappin operator even hear the flap flap flap, or was he/she aware of what that noise was, and did they gently slow down to pull over, or did they slam on the brakes and/or violently overcorrect the steering wheel?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2010, 08:34 PM   #34 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Foothills near Denver
Posts: 279

RSX2fast4mpg - '02 Acura RSX Type S
90 day: 38.22 mpg (US)

bubbatrucker - '98 Chevrolet K1500
90 day: 18.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
I wonder in how many of those "tire caused crashes" the vehicle was going 80 mph with 15 psi in the tires, with 900 lbs of crap in the back or better yet up on a rooftop carrier? And did the cell phone yappin operator even hear the flap flap flap, or was he/she aware of what that noise was, and did they gently slow down to pull over, or did they slam on the brakes and/or violently overcorrect the steering wheel?
Still, there's a difference, an obvious difference with what happens if you're driving a Civic at 80mph and get a blow out and what happens with a vehicle with a short wheel base, high center of gravity, and is too narrow by design.

Here's the facts:
* There will be an estimated 70,000 SUV rollovers in 2002, in which it's estimated 2000 people will die.
* In the 10-year period during which Ford-Firestone related rollovers caused some 300 deaths, more than 12,000 people -- 40 times as many -- died in SUV rollover crashes unrelated to tire failure.
* A Ford Explorer is 16 times as likely as the typical family car to kill occupants of another vehicle in a crash.
* 1 out of 4 new vehicles sold in the U.S. is an SUV, making it the most popular type of vehicle in America. The Ford Explorer is the most popular SUV in the world.
* SUVs had the highest rollover involvement rate of any vehicle type in fatal crashes -- 36 percent, as compared with 24 percent for pickups, 19 percent for vans and 15 percent for traffic cars. SUVs also had the highest rollover rate for passenger vehicles in injury crashes -- 12 percent, as compared to 7 percent for pickups, 4 percent for vans and 3 percent for passenger cars.

While I do have to worry a lot more about the severity of injury due to striking wildlife than the driver of an SUV, you can't ignore the different handling dynamics of SUVs compared to passenger cars.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2010, 11:38 PM   #35 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SentraSE-R View Post
I'll bet money that those of you who say "tain't nothin'," all had rear flats.
OK. You want to send it to my PayPal account? Because the two blowouts I've had in the Insight were both the left front, both caused by road debris (holes in the sidewall you could stick a couple of fingers through), both at highway speeds. Both of them were just a bit of thump-thump-thump and a bit of drag & pull. In fact, one was on a freeway interchange - I5 south to I205 south of Stockton - and I wasn't even sure at first that it was a blowout, and not just a stretch of typical California pavement :-)

And then there was the time, back in the '70s, when I had a blowout in the right front of my old GTO - at about 110 mph. No drama at all.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 12:11 AM   #36 (permalink)
Wannabe greenie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 1,098

The Clunker (retired) - '90 Honda Accord EX sedan
Team Honda
90 day: 29.49 mpg (US)

Mountain Goat - '96 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 SuperCab
90 day: 18 mpg (US)

Zippy - '10 Kymco Agility 125
90 day: 65.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 53 Times in 40 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
In fact, one was on a freeway interchange - I5 south to I205 south of Stockton - and I wasn't even sure at first that it was a blowout, and not just a stretch of typical California pavement :-)
Ugh, I don't miss that commute. Manteca to Oakland back when 205 was two lanes. Chicken ****s who stayed in the left lane on the Altamont because they were skeered of the dropoff past the right shoulder. 238 parking lot. Sinkhole and pavement collapse across all eastbound lanes because of 100+ degree heat. (Not that I have it a lot better right now...)

/End threadjack
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 04:37 AM   #37 (permalink)
Pishtaco
 
SentraSE-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485

Mean Green Toaster Machine - '06 Scion xB
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
I guess I lost my own bet. My front flat was on a car without power steering, and I weighed under 130 lbs at the time. All my other car flats were rear tire incidents.

My front motorcycle flat happened on a curve, and I couldn't keep the bike on my side of the road. Fortunately, there was no oncoming traffic when it occurred.
__________________
Darrell

Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 06:47 AM   #38 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
Why would you run 65psi? Why would you even run sidewall max of 55psi? Now you see why it's foolish--- tires aren't cheap. Either you wear them unevenly with the high pressure or you damage them, and it ends up costing way more than you saved in gas.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 10:45 AM   #39 (permalink)
I have to start over?
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 214

Big inefficient truck - '94 Dodge Ram 2500
90 day: 12.1 mpg (US)

Honda Civic - '84 Honda Civic DX Hatchback
Thanks: 2
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
The tire pressure didn't have much to do with the failure. It was the age. When I got my tires replaced, we noticed that they were made in 2002 and that they had some dry rot more serious than I thought.

I went with a matching pair of p215/75 with a surprising amount of tread on them for $30 each (I'm not going to ask the shop where they came from). Made in 2008. Much better. I put them on the front and left the big ones on the back. 2 fold benefits: maintain the taller final drive ratio, and lower the front about an inch. Yeah, I have a hot rod jeep!

Furthermore, with the old tires on the back, if one should decide to blow out, I will have a rear tire blowout, not front.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2010, 11:26 AM   #40 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

RaceJeep - '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 13.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
Thecheese - be aware, you CANNOT use 4wd at all, on any surface with those mismatched tires.

Regarding rollovers, some SUVs are definitely less stable than others, although a lot of it comes down to drivers that think they're going to handle like sports cars. If people knew how to drive them, there would be far less accidents and rollovers involving them. Same reason why so many get stuck off the road in the snow. Drivers think they're invincible and drive way too fast.

__________________
Call me crazy, but I actually try for mpg with this Jeep:



Typical driving: Back in Rochester for school, driving is 60 - 70% city
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Top 5 most fuel efficient tires (Lowest Rolling resistance: LRR) blackjackel General Efficiency Discussion 144 01-26-2016 12:39 AM
Discussion on tire efficiency Ernie Rogers General Efficiency Discussion 69 12-27-2014 02:17 PM
Tips needed for eco-driving my diesel truck! nubbzcummins Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 65 12-07-2010 02:37 PM
Bridgestone Tires and LRR gone-ot EcoModding Central 30 05-04-2010 01:31 PM
New Wheels & Tires trikkonceptz Success Stories 9 11-03-2008 03:05 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com