01-23-2008, 02:09 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
MPG...what?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Finksburg, MD
Posts: 145
Terkle - '97 Toyota Tercel Whitehawk 90 day: 40.91 mpg (US) Bubble - '10 Toyota Yaris base 90 day: 41.88 mpg (US) Deva - '13 Chevrolet Spark LS 90 day: 39.82 mpg (US) Malibu5 - '82 Chevrolet Malibu Classic 90 day: 17.61 mpg (US) Highlander - '06 Toyota Highlander Limited 90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
what I did to the Cavy today
got a K&N panel filter today for Tracey's Cavy...the old paper filter was getting dirty & well, she plans on driving the car into the ground, so the K&N was a logical choice, since it'll cost less in the long run, was only $34, versus around $7 for the paper panel
Also got a can of Seafoam, so i put 1/2 a pint in the oil to stir around for the last 500miles to clean out any deposits, then i ran the last 1/2 thru the intake to help clean out some carbon
Then i pumped the tires up to 44psi.
The car definetly accelerates better to my suprise (usually a panel filter doesn't make much of a difference) & it definetly rolls father when i coast
this tank is going to be a little less MPG from me, uh cleaning out the SeaFoam but we'll find out exactly what these mods will do for my MPG the next tank, still has about a 1/2 tank of gas left in it
__________________
-Greg...the exhaust freak.
-06 Highlander 3.3awd
-10 Yaris sedan
-97 Tercel, 1NZfe swapped
-96 Tercel
-82 Malibu 1UZfe swapped
-19 Fit (wifey ride)
www.pipedreamsfab.com
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
01-23-2008, 02:34 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by malibuguy
got a K&N panel filter today for Tracey's Cavy...the old paper filter was getting dirty & well, she plans on driving the car into the ground, so the K&N was a logical choice, since it'll cost less in the long run, was only $34, versus around $7 for the paper panel
|
How do you figure?
Paper filters go 50,000m easy, in good driving environments even more. $35/$7=5; 5 x 50,000m = 250,000miles before k&n "saves" you money, if not longer. Don't forget the cost of the cleaning and reoiling kits! Oh, and the MAF cleaners you need to buy and use after the k&n gooks it up!
|
|
|
01-24-2008, 12:53 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Libby , Mt.
Posts: 52
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
k and n gained me 2 miles a gallon in the geo after i put it in 52 mpg average, plus the old filter needed to be raplaced anyhow , so after 26 gallons i get a free gallon of 3.00$ , so every 1352 miles i get 3.00 back at 13,520 miles i got a free air cleaner, but if it didnt improve your mileage i dunno what to tell ya
__________________
|
|
|
01-24-2008, 01:19 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
MPG...what?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Finksburg, MD
Posts: 145
Terkle - '97 Toyota Tercel Whitehawk 90 day: 40.91 mpg (US) Bubble - '10 Toyota Yaris base 90 day: 41.88 mpg (US) Deva - '13 Chevrolet Spark LS 90 day: 39.82 mpg (US) Malibu5 - '82 Chevrolet Malibu Classic 90 day: 17.61 mpg (US) Highlander - '06 Toyota Highlander Limited 90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee
How do you figure?
Paper filters go 50,000m easy, in good driving environments even more. $35/$7=5; 5 x 50,000m = 250,000miles before k&n "saves" you money, if not longer. Don't forget the cost of the cleaning and reoiling kits! Oh, and the MAF cleaners you need to buy and use after the k&n gooks it up!
|
the car would have to use a MAF first to gunk it up, & second, most of those issues are from people over oiling the filters, i've never had an oily intake from a K&N filter
plus i have a recharge kit, since 5 other cars at my house use K&Ns, so 10bucks for a recharge kit every couple years is basically unnoticeable anyways
ram-air picks up alot of dust & dirt fast, paper filters load up & start dropping flow almost immediatly, which in turn cuts down on power & fuel mileage, since the engine must work harder now to draw in air & also potentially sucking dirt thru the filter due to higher pressure(vacuum) difference on the filter
then if it does increase MPGs in her car, which i suspect it will, since its such an undersized filter for the engine, but i've now almost doubled useful flow, it'll pay itself back pretty soon
alot of the time, K&N stock replacement filters don't improve upon flow, cuz sometimes, the stock paper element is quite large & has plenty of flow capacity for the stock/given engine, but when the filter is quite small for given engine, aka like a Cavalier, the additional flow from the K&N is actully usefull, & don't forget about the rest of the intake design, some cars have horrific intakes, i remember a friends '92 Escort LX had an opening around 1.25" in diameter!!! right at the beginning of the intake...removed that piece along with the resonator in the fenderwell, improved acceleration drastically & MPG from now having a almost 3" opening for the airbox
ok, enough typing for now
__________________
-Greg...the exhaust freak.
-06 Highlander 3.3awd
-10 Yaris sedan
-97 Tercel, 1NZfe swapped
-96 Tercel
-82 Malibu 1UZfe swapped
-19 Fit (wifey ride)
www.pipedreamsfab.com
|
|
|
01-24-2008, 01:24 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
MechE
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,151
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 18 Posts
|
Blah K&N... paper filters far out filter K&N...
__________________
Cars have not created a new problem. They merely made more urgent the necessity to solve existing ones.
|
|
|
01-24-2008, 01:38 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Wow those OEM engineers must be stupid...
|
|
|
01-24-2008, 08:07 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
|
In the TDI community K&N filters are a big no no. Even when properly oiled, they have been known to kill MAFs due to oil contamination. It is also an established fact that K&N filters let more dirt through than most air filters ( http://www.duramax-diesel.com/spicer/index.htm ).
On the other hand it is true that they can improve mileage in a NA car, but at the expense of engine life.
Last edited by tasdrouille; 01-24-2008 at 08:31 AM..
|
|
|
|