Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-23-2010, 07:14 PM   #1 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
What is MPG penalty for a running radiator fan?

I've started working on my grill block, and so far so good, I can already tell the difference with only half of it blocked. Was getting ready to work on blocking more when the adage of not letting the rad fan come on came to mind.

My question is, how much is the cost of letting the fan kick on at temp as necessary vs the aero drag of a half opened grill? I know the conventional wisdom is to make the fan stay off, but why? Especially if the temp the fan comes on is raised a bit?

__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-23-2010, 07:53 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: jefferson city, mo
Posts: 60

klr 650 - '08 kawasaki klr 650

The van - '15 Dodge Grand caravan Avp
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
i blocked off the full upper what does yours look like? i did not notice any differance with temps with the upper blocked. and i believe the temp thing is it gets too hot in the engine bay and melts things plus if the fan is running it is using electricity which mean the more the alternator has to work i e more gas used
__________________
SCANGUAGE IT REALLY WORKS
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 08:07 PM   #3 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
I'm certain the underhood temps are high anyway, so not too concerned with that. But what is the cost of running the fan? The Max has a 30 amp fuse for the fans, so it would have to be less than that, so about 325 watts? (25 amps @ 13 volts) Assuming alternator efficiency of 50%, that would be a 750 watt pull, or close to 1 hp of the 50 I use at crusing speed.

I'm just not seeing a huge drop in mpgs from a radiator fan running in theory.....
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 08:11 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: jefferson city, mo
Posts: 60

klr 650 - '08 kawasaki klr 650

The van - '15 Dodge Grand caravan Avp
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
it would be interesting to have a thermometer under the hood in the engine bay to see if it really got that bad.
__________________
SCANGUAGE IT REALLY WORKS
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 08:14 PM   #5 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
On a side note, by using the current mpg guage on my scanguage, which is an average of the current drive, my wife and I have been perfecting our driving technique and have been averaging 30 mpg for the tank thus far. And this is on several trips of about 10 miles each. So far so good! Both of us getting into the spirit of things helps a lot!
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 08:18 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: jefferson city, mo
Posts: 60

klr 650 - '08 kawasaki klr 650

The van - '15 Dodge Grand caravan Avp
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
it would be good to check engine bay temps just to see if it is really that bad but i am sure it may be a very small percentage loss in mpg more for true hypermillers not us in v6 sedans. sweet i am excited mine is around 26 - 28 here in branson which i see as impressive feet since we all know how traffic and hills are here lol.
__________________
SCANGUAGE IT REALLY WORKS
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 08:19 PM   #7 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
I can guarantee it gets a bit warm. Ever tried to work on the top of the engine after it had been running?

Hmm, maybe unhooking the fresh air snorkel and using the Intake Air Temp gauge on the SG would give an indication......
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 08:21 PM   #8 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by talldudenumber5 View Post
it would be good to check engine bay temps just to see if it is really that bad but i am sure it may be a very small percentage loss in mpg more for true hypermillers not us in v6 sedans
You're right I'm sure. But I sure do love our v6 sedan. I saw a gold '98 Max at a dealership with a 5 speed and nearly started crying from desire!

Luckily I convinced the wife that replacing the auto with a manual was a good idea....now just need some parts
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 08:41 PM   #9 (permalink)
Wiki Writer
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 236

bugler - '91 Mazda 626
90 day: 35.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
ShadetreeMech, regarding the MPG penalty for running the fan I will be doing a test on current draw vs MPG for my car when i finally find a good enough test site.

but from previous tests (that weren't ideal) i think there was only a few percent penalty for running with full head lights compared to parkers. I have the standard fillament lights not LED so the current draw of my head lights is probably comparable to the fan current draw.

So i wouldn't expect to see more than 2 or 3 percent for running a fan also the fan wont always be on.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 08:59 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: jefferson city, mo
Posts: 60

klr 650 - '08 kawasaki klr 650

The van - '15 Dodge Grand caravan Avp
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
we will have to compare grill blocks once we both finish. same car, similar driving environment. let the testing begin lol

__________________
SCANGUAGE IT REALLY WORKS
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First 55+ mpg tank for my '08 Cobalt XFE Fr3AkAzOiD Success Stories 36 11-13-2010 11:27 PM
MPG Baseline for Insight 1 Nailed-Long! jime57 Aerodynamics 1 07-24-2010 11:35 PM
Honda panicking about MPG? Mods current Accord to boost city & hwy MPG. MetroMPG EcoModding Central 15 07-08-2010 05:07 PM
Does this steal MPG? RandomFact314 General Efficiency Discussion 23 05-05-2009 09:08 AM
Keep A/C from running when you don't need it. TeamCF EcoModding Central 13 04-06-2009 01:55 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com