04-06-2020, 03:31 AM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,796
Thanks: 226
Thanked 1,353 Times in 711 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hat_man
Is there a general rule of thumb for better/best FE in certain RPM range?
For my Ranger it's around 2k rpm. That's 55 mph in 5th gear. At 1900 rpm the engine really gets smooth but I can't drive that slow on the highway without causing other drivers to have some "road rage".
I know there are a lot of factors that go into FE. Things like speed, gearing, tire size, etc. And that all vehicles are different. Things like weight, aero, drive train (FWD/RWD/AWD), etc. And where we drive them most often, either in town or on the highway.
So where do YOU get YOUR best mileage?
|
Yes.
At Zero r.p.m. and coasting...
>
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to redneck For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
04-07-2020, 03:09 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,171
Thanks: 352
Thanked 268 Times in 215 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecky
That's probably true with fixed gearing, because load is *probably* more important than piston speed in the vast majority of cases.
But, let's say you have a hybrid vehicle, which can spin the engine at whatever RPM, and toggle it on and off whenever. Is it going to be more efficient to spin the engine at, say, 3000rpm 90% load for 30 seconds out of every minute, or to spin it at 1500rpm 90% load and leave it running all the time?
|
This is basically the difference between 40mpg in the Prius and 60mpg in the Prius. If... Its warm enough and the cars warm up protocol doesn't sabotage me.
__________________
"I feel like the bad decisions come into play when you trade too much of your time for money paying for things you can't really afford."
|
|
|
04-08-2020, 03:46 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
Cyborg ECU
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2016 Versa
My Versa with CVT seems to get it's best mileage between 1400-1600 RPM and depending on terrain is usually 40-50 MPH.
|
I think it is important to remember that mileage (fuel Economy) and volumetric efficiency are not the same. You may get your best mileage in specific freeway conditions at 40-50 mph and 1400-1600 rpm. However, Frank's formula applied to your 2016 Versa with its 3.29 inch piston stroke should be moving at a rate of about 1100 ft/min at 2000 RPM. That might be your greatest volumetric efficiency. But if you drove 65 mph or more to cruise at 2000 rpm your aero drag would be MUCH higher and you fuel economy would suffer.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to California98Civic For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-09-2020, 07:24 AM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 361
Thanks: 275
Thanked 132 Times in 102 Posts
|
Yep, actual results trump theory every time.
We seem to be seeing this in action as the predictive models are embarrassed by actual results during the current pandemic.
Could Global Warming modeling be far behind? :-)
__________________
|
|
|
04-15-2020, 06:25 AM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Belgium
Posts: 228
Thanks: 54
Thanked 93 Times in 69 Posts
|
The best mileage so far, for a long distance (150 miles) was 71 MPG
The second best mileage I achieved for a very long distance (400 miles) was 68 MPG. Those MPG's are real MPG's, measured at the fuel pump.
Both distances were traveled at speeds between 55 and 60 MPH at 1750 - 1900 RPM in 5th gear. The car is not yet modified.
I recon that lower speeds will increase the mileage a little. However, the highest gear is quite long for the tiny three cilinder diesel engine, and lower speeds will make the engine hum with greater load.
The very very best mileage could probably be achieved in 4th gear at 35 - 40 MPH? Less drag at those speeds.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GreenTDI For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-15-2020, 08:39 AM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,077
Thanks: 2,904
Thanked 2,560 Times in 1,586 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenTDI
The best mileage so far, for a long distance (150 miles) was 71 MPG
The second best mileage I achieved for a very long distance (400 miles) was 68 MPG. Those MPG's are real MPG's, measured at the fuel pump.
Both distances were traveled at speeds between 55 and 60 MPH at 1750 - 1900 RPM in 5th gear. The car is not yet modified.
I recon that lower speeds will increase the mileage a little. However, the highest gear is quite long for the tiny three cilinder diesel engine, and lower speeds will make the engine hum with greater load.
The very very best mileage could probably be achieved in 4th gear at 35 - 40 MPH? Less drag at those speeds.
|
US or UK gallons? Care to start a fuel log? Which vehicle exactly?
Wish we had 3 cylinder diesels here.
|
|
|
04-15-2020, 09:02 AM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
Master EcoWalker
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,999
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,247 Times in 1,455 Posts
|
For me it's 1100 RPM.
My Insight refuses to drop RPM below 1100 RPM and the CVT maxes out ('top gear') at 50 km/h per 1000 RPM, so I get best economy driving 55 km/h @1100 RPM.
In nice weather that can be 35 to 40 km per liter (80 - 92 MPG)...!
60 km/h @1200 RPM is hardly any worse though, but it climbs ever faster with more speed. Anything above 80 km/h (50 mph) @1600 RPM hurts a lot.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.
For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
Last edited by RedDevil; 04-15-2020 at 10:15 AM..
|
|
|
04-15-2020, 09:51 AM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Belgium
Posts: 228
Thanks: 54
Thanked 93 Times in 69 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecky
US or UK gallons? Care to start a fuel log? Which vehicle exactly?
Wish we had 3 cylinder diesels here.
|
US gallons, I'm converting the km/l that we use into MPG (US) The car is a Skoda Fabia Estate with the 1.2 CRTDI engine, which is a VAG product and similar to the Volkswagen Polo.
I'm certainly going to start a fuel log here. Fact is that I don't drive a lot right now because of the virus lockdown …
I have some fueling data from a couple years ago on spritmonitor.de
https://www.spritmonitor.de/en/detail/465392.html
The car is definitely more economically now than those first 5 years.
Edit: link of my early fuel log in my signature
Last edited by GreenTDI; 04-15-2020 at 10:05 AM..
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GreenTDI For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-05-2020, 11:28 AM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: United States
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
In nearly all the road vehicles I've owned, best MPG is around 1500-1600 RPM. That's where the torque curve gets fat, but low enough in RPM to keep the fuel consumption down.
|
|
|
05-05-2020, 03:00 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: N/A
Posts: 142
Thanks: 32
Thanked 30 Times in 21 Posts
|
This probably depends alot on overall engine design. While done for reasons other than MPG, my engine is destroked and has large custom cams and much higher than stock static and dynamic compression; yet it seems to run best/most efficient between 2700 and 3000 RPMs (compared to about 2500 RPM stock). My piston design is kind of terrible for DI, though, so I'm sure that's costing me quite a lot of efficiency; I have yet to implement piggyback PI and/or WMI so it remains to be seen if going to a full time hybrid fueling setup can reclaim any of that.
__________________
|
|
|
|