05-05-2010, 06:07 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 568
Thanks: 1
Thanked 73 Times in 58 Posts
|
What's the best RV/motorhome aerodynamically?
Considering stock (especially used) recreational vehicles and motor homes, which ones have the best aerodynamics?
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
05-05-2010, 07:16 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,272
Thanks: 24,394
Thanked 7,363 Times in 4,763 Posts
|
Vixen
To my knowledge,the distinction would fall with the Vixen,long dead now.
Relying on memory ( risky ) with her TD BMW 5-cyl she could knock down around 21 mpg in real highway driving.
The roof tilted up for overnight stays.No Cd was published.I would have estimated it at 0.30 or a tad under based on FKFS Omnibus images from Germany.Maybe Cd 0.27.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-05-2010, 08:10 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 568
Thanks: 1
Thanked 73 Times in 58 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
To my knowledge,the distinction would fall with the Vixen,long dead now.
Relying on memory ( risky ) with her TD BMW 5-cyl she could knock down around 21 mpg in real highway driving.
The roof tilted up for overnight stays.No Cd was published.I would have estimated it at 0.30 or a tad under based on FKFS Omnibus images from Germany.Maybe Cd 0.27.
|
Check this out:
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc...=rep1&type=pdf
Esp. see configurations G and H, with CD <0.25 and wheels/tires not optimized, plus sharp roof edges. Basic brick with wheels, streamlined.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Otto For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-05-2010, 09:59 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
The GMC units from the '70's were wind tunnel tested.
I'd say the Dodge/Mercedes diesel van units will be the ones to beat due to efficient drivetrains and relatively small frontal areas.
Last edited by Frank Lee; 05-13-2010 at 04:14 AM..
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-05-2010, 10:25 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
needs more cowbell
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
|
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dcb For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-05-2010, 10:57 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: belgium, wi
Posts: 262
Bus - '94 Ford School Bus huge Stupid - '01 Chevy Blazer LS 90 day: 21.38 mpg (US) hawk - '00 Honda Superhawk
Thanks: 2
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
|
I know that this will sound bad, but if you are into ecomodding, a school bus with a diesel cummins 5.9 will get 11-12mpg without any modifications. I think that with some minor expenses, you can make a pretty sweet bus that gets 15mpg or better. We got ours for $2200. Keep in mind that this is a 38 foot engine forward flat windshield aero hog with no mods.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to autoteach For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-05-2010, 11:08 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Deadly Efficient
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Goshen, Indiana
Posts: 1,234
Thanks: 134
Thanked 176 Times in 91 Posts
|
What's the best RV/motorhome aerodynamically? The one you modify the most!
__________________
-Terry
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Tango Charlie For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-05-2010, 11:12 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: belgium, wi
Posts: 262
Bus - '94 Ford School Bus huge Stupid - '01 Chevy Blazer LS 90 day: 21.38 mpg (US) hawk - '00 Honda Superhawk
Thanks: 2
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
|
that is one of the reasons that I suggest a bus. Cheap to get, good running gear, and most of the time if you have a major failure, you can sell parts off it for as much as what you paid (in my case).
|
|
|
05-05-2010, 11:22 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
needs more cowbell
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
|
On the other end of the spectrum might be a diesel westfalia camper, maybe good for 30mpg, dunno.
course if you just want a place to stay dry and keep the bears off ya, then a mat in the back of your hatchback (passenger seat forward) can be relatively comfortable.
And a jungle hammock fits nicely on anything from a bicycle on up and is quite dry and comfortable.
Though it would be interesting to see an eco'd bus
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
|
|
|
05-06-2010, 09:30 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Recreation Engineer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Somewhere USA
Posts: 525
Thanks: 333
Thanked 138 Times in 103 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto
Considering stock (especially used) recreational vehicles and motor homes, which ones have the best aerodynamics?
|
It depends on your requirements. Where do you want to take it? How much ground clearance is needed to get in/out of camp sites? How many creature comforts are must have? How many people will be sleeping and eating inside it? How many days of food, water and restroom capacity do you need between stops? How many miles do you need between refueling stops? If traveling lots of toll roads, how many axles can you afford? What other dollar or weight budget restrictions might be involved? Don't forget all cargo needed to enjoy the trip and/or destination. If you go somewhere and drop anchor for a spell what kind of auxiliary mobility will you need to get around? These factors may have a higher effect on your satisfaction than how many MPGs you get.
BTW, I can meet (even exceed) the EPA highway number on the sticker of my (stock) truck towing this (aerodynamically stock) trailer including extras.
You can learn more about this genre of small car/truck friendly RVs at Egg Central.
Cheers
KB
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to KamperBob For This Useful Post:
|
|
|