Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-25-2013, 01:43 AM   #1 (permalink)
Lots of Questions
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Jose
Posts: 665

Motor-Rolla - '01 Toyota Corolla LE
Team Toyota
90 day: 28.3 mpg (US)

Gaia - '99 Toyota 4Runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 19.78 mpg (US)

Gaia - Round 2 - '99 Toyota 4runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 17.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 343
Thanked 101 Times in 79 Posts
Rear Wheel Steering

For some reason, the other day a thought popped into my head about an old commercial for the Yukon Denali. The big selling point was that the rear wheels could turn, making it easier to turn the truck. I was just wondering why, other than a select few, more cars don't have this option, especially larger vehicles. Would this not save from having to need such a large PS pump?

__________________
Don't forget to like our Facebook page!




Best EM Quotes:
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
It has been said, that if you peel the duct tape back on Earth's equator, you'll find that the two hemispheres are held together with J B Weld.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan9 View Post
subscribed with a soda.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
If you're burning,and someone throws gasoline on you,there will be a localized cooling effect, but you're still on fire.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-25-2013, 01:56 AM   #2 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,548
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,622 Times in 1,447 Posts
I remember that system, the QuadraSteer. It's still often used in 3-axle trucks and buses back here, but it's not reported to decrease fuel economy so considerably. Might be more due to the extra weight, which is not so much considering the whole vehicle weight. But what made it not so popular was the price tag, as it was an optional feature.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2013, 03:01 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,005

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 42.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,866
Thanked 2,501 Times in 1,547 Posts
In the late 80's there was a Honda Prelude with 4WS, and I believe Honda is bringing it back in one of the 2014 Acura models (saw a commercial for it a few days ago). I imagine complexity and therefore cost are the reasons we don't see it more.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2013, 08:02 AM   #4 (permalink)
one of thOOOse people
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: the cloud(s)
Posts: 293

twitchy - '98 honda civic dx + sir + ls
90 day: 30.2 mpg (US)

Norman - '14 Ford E-350 EXT
90 day: 16.18 mpg (US)

Silver - '12 VW Golf Base
90 day: 26.1 mpg (US)

Sparta - '19 Honda CB300R
90 day: 84.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 81 Times in 66 Posts
I remeber the Honda Prelude with 4ws. That system was passive and used the lean of the body to turn the rear wheels. The handling was worse and the system was often defeated by owners seeking good performance.

I'd bet active systems need a *bigger* powersteering pump too as the rear would be all hydraulic unless it is done electric instead. Still higher loads.

This feature is only useful if a tighter turning radius is needed.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2013, 11:30 AM   #5 (permalink)
Always Too Busy
 
Flakbadger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 566

White Lightning - '17 Nissan Leaf SV
Team Leaf
90 day: 159.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 405
Thanked 190 Times in 134 Posts
The VR-4 version of the Mitsubishi 3000GT had 4-wheel steering, and active aero, back in what, like 1993? It was way ahead of its time.

From Wikipedia

"The first generation model incorporated many of Mitsubishi's contemporary performance-enhancing technologies, such as full time four-wheel drive, four-wheel steering, active aerodynamics featuring automatically adjusting front and rear spoilers, sport/tour exhaust modes and electronically controlled suspension (ECS)."
__________________
Nissan Leaf driver? Join me in Team Leaf and feel smugly superior about our MPGe

Current Car: White Lightning

----------------------------------------------

Retired Car: Betty White
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2013, 12:23 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,005

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 42.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,866
Thanked 2,501 Times in 1,547 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flakbadger View Post
The VR-4 version of the Mitsubishi 3000GT had 4-wheel steering, and active aero, back in what, like 1993? It was way ahead of its time.

From Wikipedia

"The first generation model incorporated many of Mitsubishi's contemporary performance-enhancing technologies, such as full time four-wheel drive, four-wheel steering, active aerodynamics featuring automatically adjusting front and rear spoilers, sport/tour exhaust modes and electronically controlled suspension (ECS)."
My mother's kept eating ECU's though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2013, 01:11 PM   #7 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,175

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 269
Thanked 3,522 Times in 2,796 Posts
They are fairly common in japan. Since all most all of their cities over there have areas that are more tightly packed than NYC and LA.
In the US there isn't really a need for a turning ability that is that tight or the added complexity of a system that will most likely break down.
We keep our cars a lot longer than they do.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2013, 02:17 PM   #8 (permalink)
herp derp Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049

Saturn-sold - '99 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 28.28 mpg (US)

Yukon - '03 GMC Yukon Denali
90 day: 13.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
the C3 and sierra denali rear steer systems are/were virtually bullet proof. the real problem was it was a $2000 option and noone wanted to pay
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2013, 05:39 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 667 Times in 409 Posts
Few people wanted to pay extra money for something that inreased weight and complexity while offering few real-world benefits. I don't see how turning two more wheels would reduce load on the PS pump, either.
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2013, 06:06 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff88 View Post
The big selling point was that the rear wheels could turn, making it easier to turn the truck. I was just wondering why, other than a select few, more cars don't have this option, especially larger vehicles. Would this not save from having to need such a large PS pump?
On 4 axle trucks and busses (2 front, 2 rear), they seem to have resorted to two steering axles up front in Europe.

A local outfit sells cross-steering trailers for semi's.
Renders, X-Steering

Dunno how bad it is in the US, but here in Europe things can get so tight that when these big guys turn, a triple-axle trailer may actually see one or two of them reverse, and they scrub heavily in the process.

Not good for the tyres, and it certainly takes more fuel - but wether that's visible in the overall FC is doubtful, as they spend most of their time going more or less straight.

AWS is only seen on mobile cranes these days.
Some cars have rear axles that have a bit of flex in them, and they steer along passively.

__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com