Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-19-2013, 12:35 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 37

Micromachine - '94 Honda Civic DX hatchback
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Question Wheel weight vs over all weight.

Let say we hove 2 identical cars that weigh 3000 LBS, one has light rims and the other has heavy rims with rear seat delete or any other component to make it stay at 3000 LBS.
Will the fuel economy be affected comparing the 2 cars?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-19-2013, 12:46 AM   #2 (permalink)
Hydrogen > EV
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NW Ohio, United States
Posts: 2,025

Silver Flea - '05 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.96 mpg (US)
Thanks: 994
Thanked 402 Times in 285 Posts
Yes.

Rotational force takes more work to move than static forces. The forty some pounds in the vehicle stands still, while each wheel's weight spins.

I have seen estimates from 4-10 times the weight for rational vs static. I believe there is more detail in other threads, it has been pretty well covered, I just have only picked up so much. The top left corner has a search function, and whatever you want to find can be found that way.
__________________





Best Tanks:
Mustang - 54.83 mpg (US) at the Green Grand Prix
Insight - 82.91966 mpg (US) over 818.5 miles.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2013, 12:44 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: eastEU
Posts: 2

dolores - '98 audi a4
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by UltArc View Post
I have seen estimates from 4-10 times the weight for rational vs static.
Ok, I've seen this too often. That is just a wishfull belief from people who support lightweight rims. I like lightweight rims, ride on 13lbs, but the reality is that the ratio is about 1.5@rims and maybe 2@tyres.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2013, 12:44 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
HypermilerAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Southern France
Posts: 159

AX - '95 Citröen AX

307 - '04 Peugeot 307 SW
Thanks: 12
Thanked 67 Times in 37 Posts
It entirely depends on driving. At perfect constant speed, fuel economy will be exactly the same (never the case in real life though).
On highway driving, the difference is almost negligible. In city driving, hypermiling techniques are decisive to take advantage of the energy that has been stored in the wheels (even though we never get all the energy back).
I think rotational weight influence is largely overestimated : 4-10 times might only be at full throttle and the overall factor is much lower than that even in city driving.
__________________
Citroën AX 1.5 D 430.000 km
Peugeot 307 SW 2.0 HDI 136 195.000 km
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to HypermilerAX For This Useful Post:
Occasionally6 (07-20-2013)
Old 07-19-2013, 08:51 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,720
Thanks: 8,151
Thanked 8,933 Times in 7,375 Posts
Where does the energy the shock absorbers absorb come from?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2013, 09:26 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
GreenHornet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Oregon
Posts: 429
Thanks: 41
Thanked 108 Times in 68 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honda View Post
Let say we hove 2 identical cars that weigh 3000 LBS, one has light rims and the other has heavy rims with rear seat delete or any other component to make it stay at 3000 LBS.
Will the fuel economy be affected comparing the 2 cars?
There are 3 weights that you need to contend with and consider in a car design and they are:

#1. Sprung weight
#2. Unsprung weight
#3. Rotational mass

They all have an effect on overall handling and performance. However Unsprung weight will have more of an effect than sprung weight. Rotational mass will have a bigger effect on the acceleration or your car and its overall quickness. Hence is why some cars opt for reduced mass flywheels and lighter drivelines and axles such as the carbon composite or aluminum options.

If you are in a position where you need to make a choice to reduce weight somewhere always first look to reduce unsprung weight then go from there depending on your goals and objectives.

GH
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2013, 01:15 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: World
Posts: 385
Thanks: 82
Thanked 82 Times in 67 Posts
If you have to brake and dissipate the energy, the extra energy stored in heavier rotating parts matters. If you don't, it makes virtually no difference in terms of efficiency; it's still there just stored in a different form.

For a given power input and final stopping point you will accelerate more slowly and decelerate for a longer period of time. You will be slower.

If you want to quantify the rotational energy it depends on the polar moment of inertia of the rotating object. Mass concentrated towards the outside of the rotating object matters more than mass closer to the axis of rotation. Losing a pound of weight off the tire will have more effect than a pound of weight off the wheel.

Last edited by Occasionally6; 07-22-2013 at 02:29 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2013, 01:23 AM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 37

Micromachine - '94 Honda Civic DX hatchback
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occasionally6 View Post
Losing a pound of weight off the tire will have more effect than a pound of weight off the wheel.
Are you saying using low profile tire?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2013, 01:35 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,720
Thanks: 8,151
Thanked 8,933 Times in 7,375 Posts
Presumably, the tires would be held constant for the purposes of the test. Load rating (# of plys) would vary the weight of identically sized tires.
Quote:
Mass concentrated towards the outside of the rotating object matters more than mass closer to the axis of rotation.
But rotational energy is a give and take situation, while deviations from a direct path are just take, take, take. Every time you hit a pot-hole, the weight of that corner is lifted by a punch from the sprung mass. Wheel alignment/steering play—same thing.

Where does that energy come from, out of your gas tank?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2013, 01:46 AM   #10 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,174 Times in 1,470 Posts
Here are two interesting links.

1) A rotational mass calculator: Calculate Moment of inertia, Angular Mass Moments - Online Calculation - Physics Calculator

2) A car and driver test of different wheel sizes, showing acceleration, braking, and MPG: Effects of Upsized Wheels and Tires Tested - Tech Dept. - Car and Driver

__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to California98Civic For This Useful Post:
mikeyjd (07-20-2013), Sven7 (07-20-2013)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com