View Poll Results: Why do you drive an auto?
|
I drive a manual
|
|
84 |
54.90% |
I have driven both, and prefer auto
|
|
19 |
12.42% |
I have only driven automatics
|
|
3 |
1.96% |
I couldn't get the car I wanted with a manual because of buying used
|
|
27 |
17.65% |
I couldn't get the car I wanted with a manual because they aren't made (excl hybrid)
|
|
16 |
10.46% |
I couldn't get the car I wanted with a manual because it's a hybrid
|
|
4 |
2.61% |
12-13-2010, 08:24 PM
|
#61 (permalink)
|
Fhqwhgads
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: STL Metro
Posts: 94
Thanks: 28
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
I'd like to get a hybrid manual Subaru after we get married. Now, if I could just get the fiance to learn standard...(She once knew how, but the Saab she learned manual with had massive transmission problems that ended in several backwards, downhill, traffic-dodging experiences. I bid myself good luck with the Subie endeavor...)
__________________
When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the universe. John Muir
"Price is what the person pays. Cost is what society pays, here, now, elsewhere and into the future." Natural Capitalism
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
12-13-2010, 10:26 PM
|
#62 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 865
Thanks: 29
Thanked 111 Times in 83 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcb
city is where a manual really shines in the mpg department, it's no serious effort, just part of driving.
|
What city do you live in? Try daily driving in a really densely populated area such as N.Y. City. Constant shifting is unavoidable and soon takes its toll on a clutch.
What does it cost to replace a clutch nowadays? It may be sweet if you own a vehicle repair facility. Its not so sweet having to pay for clutch replacement every 30K or so.
|
|
|
12-13-2010, 10:39 PM
|
#63 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 865
Thanks: 29
Thanked 111 Times in 83 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by darcane
I let it slide the first go around, but not twice...
|
I don't understand. What does that mean?
Quote:
I think I drive in the city often enough to be considered a city dweller. And the city I drive in is one of the worst when it comes to hills (Seattle). I'd still much rather have a manual than an auto. You have little more to do, but you are far more in control of what your car does with a manual. You can get better performance (whether that performance is spirited driving or driving for efficiency) with a manual. Manuals aren't just for braindead freeway cruising. In fact, part of why I like manuals is that it keeps me actively thinking about what I an doing.
|
I don't think you understand what driving is like with a stop sign on every corner and traffic lights and traffic virtually everywhere you drive. It requires constant braking and shifting.
I like driving a manual. I don't particularly like automatics, they are just more practical and economical in terms of less maintenance for my environs. Hills have little or nothing to do with it. But needing to shift constantly wears out a clutch, due to unavoidable and relentless use.
|
|
|
12-14-2010, 03:46 AM
|
#64 (permalink)
|
Pishtaco
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
|
Darcane drives Seattle hills, and I drive San Francisco hills in manual transmission cars. We understand fully what it's like driving in metropolitan conditions, and still prefer manuals. Automatics never approach the fuel efficiency of manuals in the hands of a hypermiler.
As for clutch replacements, I save enough annually in fuel costs to pay for a clutch every year. When I gave my eight year old SE-R to my daughter last month, its original clutch was still (and is still) working fine.
__________________
Darrell
Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
|
|
|
12-14-2010, 06:12 AM
|
#65 (permalink)
|
needs more cowbell
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ˙
Posts: 5,038
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thymeclock
...
What does it cost to replace a clutch nowadays?...
|
about $80 and a weekend, in chicago area. Lasts about 130k. Nothing to fret over. Worth the efficiency gains, easier than walking. You don't have to slip the clutch any more than necessary to get the car rolling, I don't slip it at all between gears. So many countries are predominantly stick, and some are quite hilly, plenty of precedent for not having a lazy and sloppy automatic in the city.
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
Last edited by dcb; 12-14-2010 at 06:22 AM..
|
|
|
12-14-2010, 10:17 AM
|
#66 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thymeclock
Try daily driving in a really densely populated area such as N.Y. City. Constant shifting is unavoidable and soon takes its toll on a clutch.
Its not so sweet having to pay for clutch replacement every 30K or so.
|
The constant shifting in city traffic, when done properly, actually isn't too bad.
In city traffic, one's usuallynot gunning it, so the wear is within limits.
If you need a clutch replacement after 30K miles, get an automatic or learn to use the clutch properly.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side
|
|
|
12-14-2010, 10:27 AM
|
#67 (permalink)
|
needs more cowbell
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ˙
Posts: 5,038
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
|
the other efficiency technique is simply to time the stoplights/obstructions so you don't have to get the car moving from a dead stop, which is where most all the clutch wear happens.
I was paying more attention to my clutch technique, and it seems that I basically give the throttle a slight (educated) blip, and as I quickly engage the clutch I'm quickly lifting off the gas, so I wind up at about 5mph with the clutch fully engaged and the throttle near the idle throttle position in short order, at which point I get on the gas.
Imagine how long your brakes would last if you only had to bring the car to a complete stop from 5mph? Same deal in reverse here for the clutch. Take "don't ride the clutch" seriously.
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
|
|
|
12-14-2010, 12:22 PM
|
#68 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 865
Thanks: 29
Thanked 111 Times in 83 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder
The constant shifting in city traffic, when done properly, actually isn't too bad.
In city traffic, one's usuallynot gunning it, so the wear is within limits.
If you need a clutch replacement after 30K miles, get an automatic or learn to use the clutch properly.
|
I refer you back to my first post (#11) in this thread:
Quote:
This is contingent on the type of driving you do. We live in citified environs (suburbia). I once owned a car that I bought new that was a manual and I enjoyed it, but the clutch was shot by 40K miles. Not that I don't know how to clutch, (believe me, I DO). But realize that when you drive almost exclusively in city traffic you cannot avoid needing to clutch and shift a lot, a great deal more than if you are in a rural environment doing mostly highway driving.
So for us having automatic transmissions is a 'must'. And changing the automatic tranny fluid helps too. So far none of my vehicles have needed transmission repair with over 100K miles on each, whereas one with a manual clutch would have worn out and needed replacement several times by now.
|
|
|
|
12-14-2010, 01:20 PM
|
#69 (permalink)
|
needs more cowbell
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ˙
Posts: 5,038
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
|
the point is, as I describe in post 67, there is a way to minimize clutch wear. If you broke it in 40k, you were having too much "fun". You could wear out a set of brake pads in 10k miles if you tried also, it isn't the cars fault.
Automatics are not a "must", except for certain handicaps. And making excuses that you "must" have one is not eco.
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
|
|
|
12-14-2010, 04:24 PM
|
#70 (permalink)
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
|
dcb -
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcb
the point is, as I describe in post 67, there is a way to minimize clutch wear. If you broke it in 40k, you were having too much "fun". You could wear out a set of brake pads in 10k miles if you tried also, it isn't the cars fault.
...
|
When I drove my Dad's 1971 Karmann Ghia I was a clutch rider. I went through two clutches in maybe 40K miles. One was so worn down that the tops of the mounting screws were almost completely worn off.
On my current 1999 SW2 I got a new clutch at 115K miles, but that was done as part of a quill (throwout?) bearing repair. I have put 90K miles on my current clutch.
I think of clutch plates, brake pads, and rotors as a part of a car that is *supposed* to wear out. I will take care of them as best I can, but I have no problem with replacing them if they have given me decent service :
HowStuffWorks "Common Problems and Other Types of Clutches"
CarloSW2
Last edited by cfg83; 12-14-2010 at 04:30 PM..
|
|
|
|