Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-28-2012, 05:43 PM   #21 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 304

sr185 bullet - '81 Yamaha SR185 streamliner
Team Streamliner
90 day: 96.35 mpg (US)

Sunny Colarado - '06 Chevrolet Colarado WT
90 day: 24.18 mpg (US)

cbr250s - '12 Honda cbr250
90 day: 115.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 27
Thanked 71 Times in 46 Posts
Wind has always been a viable if not always reliable source of propulsion, and even a windsurfer or kiteboard can exceed windspeed if the person operating it is skilled enough.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-28-2012, 09:58 PM   #22 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 506
Thanked 867 Times in 654 Posts
I thought the directly into the wind or faster than the wind downwind were interesting.

Wind-Powered Car Travels Downwind Faster Than the Wind | Autopia | Wired.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2012, 01:54 PM   #23 (permalink)
A Legend in his Own Mind
 
Ken Fry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 281
Thanks: 52
Thanked 91 Times in 54 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703 View Post
I thought the directly into the wind or faster than the wind downwind were interesting.

Wind-Powered Car Travels Downwind Faster Than the Wind | Autopia | Wired.com
The first case, sailing directly into the wind is easy to imagine, and as a result many windmill-powered boats have been built by enthusiasts. The windmill drives the wheels (or underwater propeller), which makes the craft move, which makes the apparent windspeed higher, which makes the craft move more forcefully,etc.

What makes the second case so interesting is that it seems so clearly impossible, (provided you haven't thought seriously about how it might be done). If you just turn the craft I described around and start downwind, as the craft speeds up, the apparent wind decreases, eventually to zero when the wind speed and craft speed are the same. There has to be some parasitic drag, so the craft can never get to wind speed... just as a sailboat cannot get to windspeed if sailing straight downwind, no matter how large the spinnaker.

The "trick" is, of course, that the propeller on Blackbird does not drive the wheels. The wheels drive the propeller. So the thing that makes the craft move, at first, is the total drag on the structure and propeller. The movement of the craft turns the wheels which turns the propeller in the direction opposite to that in which it would turn as a windmill. By moving, the propeller extracts energy from a larger piece of air.

Like any sailboat, the craft makes use of the difference between speed relative to land (or water) and air. Without that difference, there is no energy harvested: cut a kite's string, and it falls to ground.

Sailing directly downwind faster than the wind has been demonstrated before (by a guy that worked for NASA, in the mid 1960's if I recall) but not so convincingly. The reason for such little interest has to do with utility, I suppose. Conventional (which now means equipped with rigid wings, etc.) land yachts are much faster on every point of sail other than directly down wind, and can sail down wind (tacking) and achieve a similar or better velocity made good... and it is almost certainly more fun to sail at 60 knots on tacks either side of directly downwind than it is to sail at 30 knots straight downwind. (Sailors of conventional slow sailboats might think: "Shouldn't he be saying 'gybing' downwind? But, in fact, fast boats tack downwind -- the wind moves over the bow, not the stern.)

The Physics of sailing in a river are interesting too, and prompt otherwise bright people to come up with all sorts of wrong answers for how sailing works -- just as there were many who maintained strenuously that a boat could not sail downwind at greater than windspeed. Here is an interesting thread.

A related question is posed by Moronic Bumble in post 51 of that thread:

"A river runs straight from West to East at 10 knots. A 10 mile race is held: the boats sail downstream, from West to East. The first heat is held in the morning, when there is no wind. The second heat is held in the afternoon, when there is a 10 knot wind from the West. In which heat are the faster times recorded?"
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2012, 10:11 AM   #24 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConnClark View Post
I would also move that this is some what a viable technology and it doesn't belong in the Unicorn Corral.
Motion carried.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2012, 03:58 PM   #25 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
I think if you wanted practical land transportation a better solution would be to use a windmill to pull a slight vacuum in a tube and let the vehicles enter the tube from the other end. I think Giffard had some research into that in the 1800s. Originally I think they even conceived subways to work that way.

If the vehicle fit in the tube with very close tolerances, then just 1 PSI of negative pressure would put considerable force on a 3 or 4 foot diameter capsule. 144 pounds of pressure per square foot of the surface area on the rear of the capsule. You could have many capsules in the same tube at the same time, and the air between the capsules would make them almost incapable of running into each other.

At the end of the tube, the air would be pulled into an opening at the top of the tube, so when the capsule passed the low pressure point it would just exit the tube onto a flat surface landing area.

Similar to the heating units in some buildings that maintain higher temperatures even with the doors open most of the time, but you would need to have some form of flapper valve to keep the vacuum coming in one direction. Should be totally doable, with mega high efficiency with the capsules not needing any internal power source.

You could have the capsules electrically powered to get them to the entrance point to the tube itself.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2012, 04:01 PM   #26 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Then if you really wanted to go a long distance at say 4000 MPH, just have the tubes collect passengers where they enter this.

Evacuated Tube Transport Technologies : et3 Network : Space Travel on Earth™

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2012, 04:26 PM   #27 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
Like those tubes the bank uses to take your checks at drive-thru terminals? It's interesting, but the infrastructure cost is something to investigate. I could see this sort of thing working in a tourist town where many people want to go to the same place.
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2012, 12:03 AM   #28 (permalink)
Deadly Efficient
 
Tango Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Goshen, Indiana
Posts: 1,234

Olivia - '03 Pontiac Vibe base
90 day: 36.01 mpg (US)

R2-D2 - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 134
Thanked 176 Times in 91 Posts
Ken Fry just fried my brain. I'll try to wrap my head around sailing down wind faster than the wind again later, when I'm not quite so tired.

My idea of harnessing wind is to have tall smoke stack type structures alongside the road with gaping open-mouthed elbows at the tops. The elbows would be articulated and have weather vane tails to keep the mouths into the wind. At the bottom there would be openings that point in the direction of travel. Viola, constant tailwind.
Yeah, we're off topic, but I blame Old Mech.

Okay, I'll go to bed now.
__________________
-Terry
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2012, 11:42 AM   #29 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tango Charlie View Post
Ken Fry just fried my brain. I'll try to wrap my head around sailing down wind faster than the wind again later, when I'm not quite so tired.

.
...analogy: because the triangle hypotenuse (Z) longer than either of its X- and Y-axes.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2012, 12:02 PM   #30 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 304

sr185 bullet - '81 Yamaha SR185 streamliner
Team Streamliner
90 day: 96.35 mpg (US)

Sunny Colarado - '06 Chevrolet Colarado WT
90 day: 24.18 mpg (US)

cbr250s - '12 Honda cbr250
90 day: 115.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 27
Thanked 71 Times in 46 Posts
Quote:
Like those tubes the bank uses to take your checks at drive-thru terminals?
Sounds like something out of Futurama

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	futuram-tube-transport.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	41.1 KB
ID:	10401  
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com