Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-03-2012, 06:53 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 355

The Truck - '02 Nissan GU Patrol ST
Thanks: 5
Thanked 76 Times in 50 Posts
In the good old days,
Manuals were more efficient and more reliable.
In these new days manuals are still the same, but automatics have come a long way in their efficiency and reliability, while manuals are pretty much as they were.
The fact that they are still a little more reliable is a moot point, because of all the electronics that have been thrown at the engine it will likely let you down before either the auto or manual does.
I am old school manual, so I still think they are better, but it is getting much harder to argue the point these days, and besides that, in the near future there may not even be an argument as more and more models are coming out without the manual option at all.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-03-2012, 02:58 PM   #12 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 530 Times in 356 Posts
Tesla -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tesla View Post
...
I am old school manual, so I still think they are better, but it is getting much harder to argue the point these days, and besides that, in the near future there may not even be an argument as more and more models are coming out without the manual option at all.
100% agreement. In the hands of an Ecomodder the manual can win almost every time. But if you don't want to make the effort, a modern thrifty auto makes life easier.

Historically manuals have also had a repair cost advantage. However, with fewer cars offering them, that cost advantage may also erode, .

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2012, 06:38 PM   #13 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
People care about the cost of repairing things? I thought it just all went to the landfill after a short period of functionality.

If people really cared about the repairablility of cars, cars would be simpler, not loaded down with "luxuries" a.k.a. stuff, parts would be cheap, readily available anywhere, and easy to install at home... like they used to be. I don't think people care about that anymore. They just run to the repair shop to hire a mechanic to get their wiper arms changed. If consumers gave manufacturers a strong... very strong signal they valued durability and value above fashion and planned obsolescence, vehicles today would be very different from what they are.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 03:10 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 593
Thanks: 106
Thanked 114 Times in 72 Posts
We definitely live in a world dominated by desire and if we can buy freedom from care, we will. We don't want a car that promises longer reliability, we expect every car to last until our lifestyle changes - and we expect our lifestyle to change every 3-7 years. The pressure becomes greater if you have some reason, or believe you have some reason to benefit from the judgment of others. I drove an old Tempo around for a few years, and it was tremendously economical - but its disintegration made a statement of poverty about me rather than a statement of thrift. I replaced it with a decidedly unthrifty luxury SUV, whose dual-zone climate control system is broken (and the by-the-book repair? 12.5 hours labor plus $368 parts) ... I was pretty happy with the A/C in the Tempo, it worked rather well. To offset the fuel cost, I bike to work whenever possible. This sends a message of thrift rather than poverty for some reason... well, OK - neat, and maybe i get a less droopy ass out of the deal or something
__________________
Work From Home mod has saved more fuel than everything else put together.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to shovel For This Useful Post:
cleanspeed1 (04-05-2012)
Old 04-04-2012, 05:25 PM   #15 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
From CNG Tempo to SUV... what a sad day.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
cleanspeed1 (04-05-2012), shovel (04-05-2012)
Old 04-05-2012, 07:06 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 593
Thanks: 106
Thanked 114 Times in 72 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
From CNG Tempo to SUV... what a sad day.
On a bigger-picture scale, this is "From a 16mpg multifuel SUV + a 25mpg multifuel car, to a 18mpg multifuel SUV + a bicycle" - All of which are/were greater than 8 years old and remain maintained & in service. The tempo was sold to a neighbor who's now using that commute instead of her K5, and the other SUV (the blazer in my signature) is going on ebay tonight.

In my eyes, this should result in a net reduction in my already not-embarrassing ecologic impact, in spite of appearances.

Oh.. and I kinda wish my bicycle had an automatic transmission
__________________
Work From Home mod has saved more fuel than everything else put together.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to shovel For This Useful Post:
cleanspeed1 (04-05-2012)
Old 04-05-2012, 07:11 PM   #17 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
OK, the additional context does help some... me, I feel stupid riding around in such things and I often ask myself "Doesn't that guy (in x SUV, PU, Hummer, open pipe chopper, etc.) feel like the biggest douche on the planet?"
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2012, 07:20 PM   #18 (permalink)
Diesel Addict/No Cure
 
cleanspeed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: chicago, il
Posts: 787

StolenHoopty - '90 Honda Accord EX

HvyDrnkr - '93 Cadillac Seville
Thanks: 130
Thanked 74 Times in 49 Posts
And speaking of CNG, found a place not too far from me that sells it for $1.50/gge. Might throw a system on my Cadillac so I keep the look of success while not going broke

Or something like that
__________________
Volvo WIA42 VED-12 / 335 hp / 1300 ft/lbs / 9 mpg

Big n' Boxy, Never met a Hill it Didn't Like
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2012, 07:22 PM   #19 (permalink)
Diesel Addict/No Cure
 
cleanspeed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: chicago, il
Posts: 787

StolenHoopty - '90 Honda Accord EX

HvyDrnkr - '93 Cadillac Seville
Thanks: 130
Thanked 74 Times in 49 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
OK, the additional context does help some... me, I feel stupid riding around in such things and I often ask myself "Doesn't that guy (in x SUV, PU, Hummer, open pipe chopper, etc.) feel like the biggest douche on the planet?"
Of course not. Douches have no feelings. That's why they're douches
__________________
Volvo WIA42 VED-12 / 335 hp / 1300 ft/lbs / 9 mpg

Big n' Boxy, Never met a Hill it Didn't Like
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to cleanspeed1 For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (04-05-2012), gasstingy (04-27-2012), shovel (04-05-2012)
Old 04-05-2012, 07:34 PM   #20 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Lol!

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com