09-18-2008, 01:18 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
needs more cowbell
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
|
fuel used idling vs restarting
I did a little experiment today with the mpguino.
I drove to work, but anytime I was stopped I left the engine running. I did my usual EOC, but would bump start it at the last second so I would never have to hit the starter.
I noted my idle gallons, it was 0.07 gallons, out of a total of 0.41 gallons.
The ride home I eoc'd and did not idle at all. idle gallons was 0.00 (out of 0.33 gallons), even though I used the starter several times while sitting perfectly still.
I usually get about the same mileage to and from work so no huge variance there. but I used significantly more fuel when leaving the motor running than just using the starter when necessary. Using the starter didn't even register whereas idling took %17 more fuel on my particular car/route/driving style.
For my car/commute that would mean (@4$/gallon) I would be spending roughly $140 per year on idling if I chose to. That is like 1/10 of what I paid for the car
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
09-18-2008, 07:48 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 262
Tracy - '00 vauxhall corsa
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 4 Posts
|
wow that awsome! i was wondering about how much ideling was costing me. did you have lots of stationary traffic? i think i saw a calculation for idle gallons per hour on this site that was more conservative than your data suggests. what vehicle were you driving?
__________________
Nissan Leaf 24kwh. Average FE = 300mpg 3.6miles/kwh (@plug)
|
|
|
09-18-2008, 09:19 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
needs more cowbell
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
|
It was a 3cyl metro. Working backwards, I must have spent about 12 minutes sitting still, which is a lot more time than I would have guessed. I Guess it adds up.
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
|
|
|
09-18-2008, 10:10 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
|
Thanks for the info dcb! Wow, that does seem like a long time to site idling. It just proves the point furthere that shutting the engine down at lights is an easy way to make good gains if your doing a lot of city driving.
|
|
|
09-18-2008, 11:52 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 177
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thanks for posting those results. I drive an automatic, so I'm still not sold on the idea of EOC in it. However, I know how many of the lights are timed around my town, so I kill the motor once I come to a stop. I do more driving at 55mph than I do at city speeds in terms of miles driven, though. But, any gain is any gain in my book.
__________________
"It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived."
- General George S. Patton, Jr
|
|
|
09-18-2008, 12:05 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Eco Noob
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tosev 3 - Atlanta GA
Posts: 293
Thanks: 5
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
i pondered driving with a stop watch to time the ammount of Idle time there is on an average commute. Just never remember to grab the watch before i walk out the door.
my 2.5l 4-cyc idles at about 0.25 gal / hr. and a typical commute in uses about 0.4 total gallons. 10 minutes of idle would be an additional .04 gallons.
that is 10% of my fuel going to making heat!!
i had not figured how to calc the Key start fuel - but as soon as the car is on i am moving so i considered it pretty small.
Steve
__________________
Steve - AKA Doofus McFancypants
------------------------------
"If there's a new way, I'll be the first in line - But it better work this time"
First Milestone passed - 30 MPG (city) 5/15/08
Best City Tank - 8/31/09- 34.3 MPG (EPA= 20)
Best Highway Tank - 5/20/09 - 36.5 MPG (EPA= 28)
------
In effort to drive less:
Miles NOT driven in 2009 = 648 (Work from home and Alt Transporatation)
|
|
|
09-18-2008, 12:58 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Dartmouth 2010
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447
Thanks: 92
Thanked 122 Times in 90 Posts
|
Sweet! I've been wanting to do a test like this for ages, but I've always been an idler, though recently (mpguino encouraged), I've been keying off more when sitting at lights and such.
|
|
|
09-18-2008, 01:17 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Glassboro, NJ
Posts: 88
Kawi - '04 Kawasaki Vulcan 800 Classic 90 day: 56.48 mpg (US) The Monte - '99 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Z34 90 day: 26.52 mpg (US) Mazda - '10 Mazda 3i 90 day: 35.15 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ptsmith24
Thanks for posting those results. I drive an automatic, so I'm still not sold on the idea of EOC in it.
|
Don't be afraid to EOC, depending on what EOC you're talking about, engine on coasting or engine off coasting. I engine on coast all the time in my automatic. Just shift it into neutral and when you want to get back into gear either rev the engine up to the rpms it should be or hit the brake (lightly) and shift into gear then let go of the brake. Even if you just coast with the engine on instead of off you'll save fuel instead of using the brakes a lot.
__________________
Goal one= 30mpg on The Monte by changing the nut that connects the steering wheel to the seat.
|
|
|
09-18-2008, 03:44 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by modmonster
i think i saw a calculation for idle gallons per hour on this site that was more conservative than your data suggests.
|
You probably saw this: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...-warm-584.html
Nice work, dcb.
|
|
|
09-18-2008, 05:08 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 177
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by saunders1313
Don't be afraid to EOC, depending on what EOC you're talking about, engine on coasting or engine off coasting. I engine on coast all the time in my automatic. Just shift it into neutral and when you want to get back into gear either rev the engine up to the rpms it should be or hit the brake (lightly) and shift into gear then let go of the brake. Even if you just coast with the engine on instead of off you'll save fuel instead of using the brakes a lot.
|
Engine Off Coasting. I already cost in N with the engine on and then turn the engine off at longer lights. Even when I'm coasting in neutral to, say, a 45 mph zone from a 55 mph zone, I don't have to do anything but 55 > N > 45 > D, no gas/brake deal you're talking about. No adverse affects thus far and no symptoms of anything bad. I don't do that much, but I definitely try to time out lights by N-coasting towards them. Right now, I have a little over half a tank left and I've been about 230-240 miles. I'm staying under 60MPH (mostly close to 55MPH) for this tank to see how much more that helps my mileage over the last tank on which I did 45 miles or so at 65-70MPH. Once my mileage levels off at 55MPH driving, I'll look into doing a little more each tank. I don't want to change too many things each tank because if FE gets worse, it would be more difficult to determine the exact cause. I know that isn't likely with the tips on this site, but that's the way I want to do it.
__________________
"It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived."
- General George S. Patton, Jr
|
|
|
|