Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-29-2013, 10:12 AM   #1 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
Reports: 2014 Fiesta 1.0T EPA rated 45 mpg hwy, 32 mpg city - starts @ $17240 (sedan)



The auto blogs are atwitter over the latest salvo in the MPG wars -- it's great to be able to write "MPG wars", by the way -- this one coming from Ford regarding the coming Fiesta Ecoboosted 1.0L turbo (manual transmission only).

Apparently the EPA ratings have been published, and they look like:

32 mpg (US) city
45 mpg (US) highway
37 mpg (US) combined

Ford marketers now believe fuel economy is a "feature", so you'll have to pony up extra for those MPG, unlike in the good old days of the 80's & 90's when most companies' entry level cars also typically got the best mileage in their line-ups (owing to light weight & modest engine output more than anything).

Here's what a 45 mpg highway rating costs:

Quote:
It's priced as a $995 "SE Manual EcoBoost" package, and added to the regular Fiesta SE you'll pay $17,240 in sedan form and $17,840 for the sportier hatchback. Both prices include Ford's mandatory $795 destination fee
Read more from GCR: 2014 Ford Fiesta EcoBoost Priced, 45 MPG Highway Too

That puts the Fiesta's highway rating 1 MPG higher than the Mirage CVT (44), 5 less in the city, and 3 less combined.

Ford must have really set the top gear WAAaaaay up there (numerically way "down there") to aim for 45 on the highway.

The Mirage manual beats the Fiesta in the city as well (at 34 mpg) but loses out on the highway at 42, due to too-low gearing. (Although in a recent comparison of the manual vs. CVT M irage in city driving, I saw 48 MPG from the 5-speed with very basic ecodriving techniques on a cold, blustery day.)

But then seriously, who's going to cross-shop a $17,000-$18,000 turbo compact against a 74 hp, $14,000 entry level subcompact?

The million dollar question, though, is: how believable are Ford's EPA ratings? You would think they would play it more cautiously after getting burned over their C-Max ratings blunder. A 45 MPG EcoBoost rating doesn't sound very cautious!

(See also, from MirageForum: 2014 M irage 1.2 vs. Ford Fiesta 1.0 ecoboost - which has better mileage/fuel economy? )

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	gcr-fiesta-1L-45mpg.jpg
Views:	799
Size:	51.1 KB
ID:	14021  
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
cbaber (10-30-2013), niky (12-18-2013)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-29-2013, 10:27 AM   #2 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
Oh, and for you turbo fans ( <-- see that joke I made?), is it correct that you wouldn't want to be doing engine-off coasting? A turbo longevity issue?
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2013, 11:04 AM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 132

The Rental - '13 Hyundai i30
90 day: 37.55 mpg (US)

Autocross - '04 Ford Focus ZX3
90 day: 24.76 mpg (US)

The Wifes - '02 Ford Focus SVT
90 day: 23.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 48 Times in 38 Posts
turbo's make everything better.

However i would buy the Fiesta with the 1.6T, 200hp
__________________





  Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2013, 08:53 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
nemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: US
Posts: 1,016

Chief - '06 Pontiac Grand Prix
90 day: 26.7 mpg (US)

SF1 - '12 Ford Fiesta S
90 day: 30.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 195
Thanked 247 Times in 190 Posts
Not that much of a strech.




1.6 na 5 speed

Add active grill shutters and knock it down 500 revs at highway speed and I think the 1.6 na could do 45 MPG highway consistantly.

Last edited by nemo; 10-30-2013 at 08:43 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2013, 09:56 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 132

The Rental - '13 Hyundai i30
90 day: 37.55 mpg (US)

Autocross - '04 Ford Focus ZX3
90 day: 24.76 mpg (US)

The Wifes - '02 Ford Focus SVT
90 day: 23.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 48 Times in 38 Posts
the Fiesta didnt have grill shutters? I know most of the Foci did.

It boggles my mind when there is such a simple solution to net a few MPG. Why are all automakers doing this RIGHT NOW! it doesnt even interfere with vehicle styling or performance, which were two reasons that may have stopped the eco movement
__________________





  Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2013, 10:02 PM   #6 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thenorm View Post
the Fiesta didnt have grill shutters? I know most of the Foci did.

It boggles my mind when there is such a simple solution to net a few MPG. Why are all automakers doing this RIGHT NOW! it doesnt even interfere with vehicle styling or performance, which were two reasons that may have stopped the eco movement
...for the same reason that LRR tires are NOT standard OEM on all cars...co$t.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2013, 10:04 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 132

The Rental - '13 Hyundai i30
90 day: 37.55 mpg (US)

Autocross - '04 Ford Focus ZX3
90 day: 24.76 mpg (US)

The Wifes - '02 Ford Focus SVT
90 day: 23.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 48 Times in 38 Posts
they put so much effort into telling about their fleet CAFE fuel economy ratings, and here is something that would cost like $20 extra per vehicle....
__________________





  Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2013, 11:50 PM   #8 (permalink)
EtOH
 
Allch Chcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Coast, California
Posts: 429

Cordelia - '15 Mazda Mazda3 i Sport
90 day: 37.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
It is only available with the 5spd in the SE package without any other packages. I'm glad to see it available stateside but I have to question the packaging. For example, why isn't it available on the Titanium? Even matching it with the 5spd I can forgive but not the limited options.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thenorm View Post
the Fiesta didnt have grill shutters? I know most of the Foci did.

It boggles my mind when there is such a simple solution to net a few MPG. Why are all automakers doing this RIGHT NOW! it doesnt even interfere with vehicle styling or performance, which were two reasons that may have stopped the eco movement
The active grill shutters are only available in the SFE package with the wheel covers and other cheap stuff for hundreds in markups. It looks like they avoided using them in the 1.0L Ecoboost for now.
__________________
-Allch Chcar

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 07:32 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
ever_green's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 264

gueff - '19 Mercedes Benz A250 4MATIC AMG
90 day: 30.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 79 Times in 33 Posts
too expensive, I rather buy a lean burnin used honda and save the $$
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2013, 10:58 AM   #10 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
All new cars are too expensive for me. 5 years down the road this might be a great car to own though!

__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com