Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-01-2013, 01:19 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NY state
Posts: 501

XJ Cherokee - '00 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 12.96 mpg (US)

FoFO - '11 Ford Focus SE
90 day: 36.78 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
The problem is, people will start having fun with the boost and get poor mileage.

My parents have a 2014 2.0 Ecoboost Escape AWD. My father and I have no problem getting 30-32MPG out of it (way over the EPA rating). But we drive it light and stay out of the boost.

My 2.0NA Focus can get low 40s and it is rated for 34. Wonder what the real world economy would be on this when there is someone driving for efficiency behind the wheel?

I do like the idea of turbocharging smaller engines and putting in tall overdrives. Best of both worlds! My concern is that they may not be reliable in the long run.

Turbos are getting better, especially now that they are no longer oil cooled.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-01-2013, 03:23 PM   #12 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,959 Times in 3,603 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miller88 View Post
Turbos are getting better, especially now that they are no longer oil cooled.
Will we be able to engine-off coast a Fiesta with no adverse effects on turbo longevity?
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2013, 04:02 PM   #13 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
I dont think I would without an electric water pump to keep cooling the turbo while the engine is off. It wouldnt be too hard to rig up.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2013, 10:06 AM   #14 (permalink)
In Lean Burn Mode
 
pgfpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,530

MisFit Talon - '91 Eagle Talon TSi
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 39.03 mpg (US)

Warlock - '71 Chevy Camaro

Fe Eclipse - '97 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS
Thanks: 1,251
Thanked 582 Times in 374 Posts
I think it depends on the amount of fuel that is used during the pulse. Most likely it won't be that much and only slightly more then a N/A engine would be.

I just did some stoichiometry testing on my turbo car and the center cartridge doesn't increase at all in temperature after a pulse at 14.7 A/F and pulling over and checking with a infra-red gun. The added frequency of EOC is what would determine the amount of engine oil break down and a good synthetic oil would be a must to offset it.

To be fair EOC also has to have some negative effect at the exhaust valve guide since the exhaust valve itself will run around 650*C at the center of the valves head.

Today's turbo cars are all water cooled and what Daox proposed is a very good idea and I agree a extra low voltage water pump could be installed very easily.
__________________
Pressure Gradient Force
The Positive Side of the Number Line


Last edited by pgfpro; 11-02-2013 at 11:58 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to pgfpro For This Useful Post:
PaleMelanesian (01-15-2014)
Old 11-02-2013, 01:33 PM   #15 (permalink)
wdb
lurker's apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: the Perimeter
Posts: 942

PlainJane - '12 Toyota Tacoma Base 4WD Access Cab
90 day: 20.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 504
Thanked 226 Times in 173 Posts
There have been a lot of improvements to engine-off cooling of turbochargers as well. My STi for example has a small coolant reservoir located above the turbocharger. When the engine is off, heat continues to be exchanged from the turbo to the reservoir via conduction. Turbo timers, even in high performance cars, are pretty much a thing of the past.

When I was in Europe a few years ago we rented a little Fiat diesel thingie. It looked like a tiny minivan. It had a 1.1L turbocharged engine. The turbo was the size of a large coin! It was so small and spun up so fast that its full capacity was available just above idle; if I recall correctly full boost was at 1500 RPMs. I would expect this Ford turbo will be similar. In other words it won't be something you will be able to "stay out of" during acceleration because it will spin up so quickly and easily.

Last edited by wdb; 11-02-2013 at 01:40 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2013, 03:40 PM   #16 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,443

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,209
Thanked 4,388 Times in 3,362 Posts
I don't understand how turbos are hurt by shutting off the engine. Sure, the oil or water that cools it stops flowing, but so does the heat generation. Does a turbo continue to increase in temperature after the engine is shut down, and if so, how?
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2013, 07:30 PM   #17 (permalink)
In Lean Burn Mode
 
pgfpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,530

MisFit Talon - '91 Eagle Talon TSi
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 39.03 mpg (US)

Warlock - '71 Chevy Camaro

Fe Eclipse - '97 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS
Thanks: 1,251
Thanked 582 Times in 374 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
I don't understand how turbos are hurt by shutting off the engine. Sure, the oil or water that cools it stops flowing, but so does the heat generation. Does a turbo continue to increase in temperature after the engine is shut down, and if so, how?
The turbo's hottest part, the turbine starts to cool when the engine is shut down. But the problem lies in the turbine transferring heat to the center cartridge. When the engine is shut off, the center cartridge will no longer have nice cool oil and coolant to cool it.

When the engine is running the center cartridge will run around 220*F due to oil and coolant flow. The turbine housing always is transferring heat to the center cartridge. But with the engine off and no circulation of coolant and oil to pull away heat from the center cartridge you could see the oil film degrade at the turbo's shaft and bearing's, if the turbine reaches extreme temperatures from very high engine load, or not enough ignition advance.


This is one of my turbo's that had some heat issues. Plus you can also see some coking at the turbine's seal.
__________________
Pressure Gradient Force
The Positive Side of the Number Line


Last edited by pgfpro; 11-02-2013 at 08:44 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to pgfpro For This Useful Post:
UltArc (11-02-2013)
Old 11-02-2013, 08:06 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NY state
Posts: 501

XJ Cherokee - '00 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 12.96 mpg (US)

FoFO - '11 Ford Focus SE
90 day: 36.78 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
Will we be able to engine-off coast a Fiesta with no adverse effects on turbo longevity?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
I dont think I would without an electric water pump to keep cooling the turbo while the engine is off. It wouldnt be too hard to rig up.

I have not looked at the 1.0 EB, but the other EcoBoost engines (and most engines with coolant cooled turbos) have the cooling system designed to utilize convection currents to keep the coolant flowing when the engine is off. You no longer have to idle when you get somewhere to allow the turbo to cool down.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2013, 08:52 PM   #19 (permalink)
5 Gears of Fury
 
War_Wagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,230

Spunky - '90 Honda Civic CX
90 day: 35.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 175
Thanked 176 Times in 137 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
I don't understand how turbos are hurt by shutting off the engine. Sure, the oil or water that cools it stops flowing, but so does the heat generation. Does a turbo continue to increase in temperature after the engine is shut down, and if so, how?
I was always told that it's because the turbo is still spinning when you shut the car off if it had recently been under boost, and once the engine stops then the shaft is still spinning with no oil circulation. I don't know how accurate that is, but it made sense when I heard it. The turbo timer would let the oil keep flowing at idle until the turbo had time to stop spinning.
__________________
"Don't look for one place to lose 100 pounds, look for 1600 places to lose an ounce." - Tony DeFeo
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2013, 09:21 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
If you P&G (engine off) you are going from a significant impeller speed to basically nothing fairly quickly. While you jsut shut the engine off the turbine impeller could still be spinning at 20-30,000 RPM. Although you have shut off the heat source (combustion) you have not shut off the heat transfer.

Now you have a very hot turbo, with the shaft spinning rapidly and it is very hot, but you have eliminated the oil flow and coolant flow (if water cooled). Even with a high quality synthetic oil, you have a recipe for failure, a situation way outside design parameters.

regards
Mech

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to user removed For This Useful Post:
UltArc (11-02-2013)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com