06-08-2011, 10:08 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 623
Thanks: 35
Thanked 119 Times in 67 Posts
|
What's YOUR motivation for ecomodding
I wanted to take an informal poll: What's YOUR motivation for ecomodding?
A) Saving money
B) Reducing CO2 emissions
C) Reducing pollutant emissions (CO, HC, NOx, PM, etc)
D) A fun hobby
E) Other (please specify)
It's okay to give your answers in percentage form.
My answer is:
A) 90%
B) 0%
C) 0%
D) 10%
E) 0%
__________________
Diesel Dave
~Life is an optimization problem.~
~Who says that just because your vehicle weighs over 3 tons that you can't get good mileage?~
|
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 11:39 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Work In Progress
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mt Vernon, WA
Posts: 135
Thanks: 2
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
|
The fact that I drive 30k+ miles per year and have a severe shortage of funds. Also, it saves cash that goes into my sports car. Plus it's a good feeling knowing that I have saved over 1003 US gallons to date driving my Metro.
__________________
|
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 11:57 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
60+ mpg at posted speeds
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 1,190
Thanks: 385
Thanked 166 Times in 113 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man
...saving $ + personnal challenge (I know I can achieve better MPG!)
|
that and learning in general (in this case specifically engine mechanics/dynamics and aerodynamics). I want to keep my car forever, rebuild it piece by piece.
__________________
Black and Green will be rebuilt over decades as parts die--until it becomes a different car. Goal is only 60-70 mpg at posted speeds. I'm not trying for highest possible mileage.
Calculators: standard deviation, Ohms Law, & drag HP losses.
|
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 01:05 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 228
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
|
90% hobby (D)
10% saving money (A)
|
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 01:08 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Diesel Addict/No Cure
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: chicago, il
Posts: 787
Thanks: 130
Thanked 70 Times in 47 Posts
|
The challenge. Even though I am in an industry where a .5 mpg can mean a huge difference to the bottom line, I love thinking about pushing the envelope on what can be done, regardless. In the beginning it was speed, at the expense of everything else; now it's speed, mpg, and eco friendliness.
__________________
Volvo WIA42 VED-12 / 335 hp / 1300 ft/lbs / 9 mpg
Big n' Boxy, Never met a Hill it Didn't Like
|
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 02:19 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Absent without leave.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Englishman living in Scotland
Posts: 3,365
Thanks: 168
Thanked 250 Times in 187 Posts
|
A) Saving money - 50%
B) Reducing CO2 emissions ~5% *
C) Reducing pollutant emissions (CO, HC, NOx, PM, etc) ~5-10% **
D) A fun hobby - 20%
E) Other (please specify) - 'Fighting' the numbers instead of other drivers, far less stress - 20%
* I'm sure this comes as a surprise given the 'lively' debates that have been had on this on this forum not to be re-run here, but there are many levels of skepticism.
** I don't put this so high as I assume two things - i) the engineers who designed my car optimised this, and ii) by using less fuel I reduce them further.
__________________
No longer here. Bye, and good luck to all.
|
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 02:20 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
The road not so traveled
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 303
Thanks: 10
Thanked 20 Times in 18 Posts
|
Its more the technical challenge than anything else.
On the Jeep, its all technical challenge. Can I get a cinderblock with huge off road tires get 25mpg on the highway (@75mph)? The mods are going to cost more than anything I can save, but I will definetly have some bragging rights.
|
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 02:22 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Absent without leave.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Englishman living in Scotland
Posts: 3,365
Thanks: 168
Thanked 250 Times in 187 Posts
|
PS - DD, is this part of your sig entirely correct?
Quote:
|
~Who says that just because you're vehicle weighs 3.5 tons that you can get good mileage?~
|
Shouldn't that be "can't" ? 
__________________
No longer here. Bye, and good luck to all.
|
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 02:50 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 623
Thanks: 35
Thanked 119 Times in 67 Posts
|
Yeah, you're right. Thanks for catching the typo.
__________________
Diesel Dave
~Life is an optimization problem.~
~Who says that just because your vehicle weighs over 3 tons that you can't get good mileage?~
|
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 03:14 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Spaulding Rally Master
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 415
Thanks: 11
Thanked 56 Times in 43 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man
...saving $ + personnal challenge (I know I can achieve better MPG!)
|
+1
Now instead of brain dead commuting with brief moments of getting real performance out of my car I'm getting real performance out of it all the time.
__________________

At last fill-up, number 30 by POE (active)
Quote:
|
47) "Drive without brakes" (DWB) Minimize use of the brake pedal. Each time you press it, you're effectively converting gasoline into brake dust and heat.
|
|
|
|
|
|