Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register
Now


Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-25-2008, 02:00 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Exton PA
Posts: 35

Whitey - '03 Cavalier base
90 day: 37.01 mpg (US)
which would benefit me more?

trying to decide which would benifit my quest for better economy more. my two options are - -

1. installing cruise control
2. buying a scangauge 2

my car does not have cruise, which i think would help alot with the amount of miles i drive on highway, letting the computer control things. or get the scan gauge so i can monitor things and find out. im not too sure how to go about installing cruise, but i might just call the dealer and find out. if its less then $300 it might be worth it?

what are your inputs? which should i go with?

thanks
Brian


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:09 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
FastPlastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 160

98 Cherokee - '98 Cherokee
90 day: 18.42 mpg (US)

ZX7R Ninja - '99 ZX7R Ninja
90 day: 37.47 mpg (US)
I would suggest the ScanGauge. Nothing makes the foot lighter then watching the MPG's go down. Plus unless you get the older style cruise control (holds the gas steady rather then the speed) you'll see better results without cruise.

But it all depends on if your foot can handle the long drives.
__________________

Adjusted for my driving habits. 80%city/20%Highway.
20mpg city/30mpg highway or bust! Check out my mods so far
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:21 PM   #3 (permalink)
35hp @ 5280ft
 
99metro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nunn, Colorado
Posts: 120

putt-putt - '99 Metro Base
90 day: 57.89 mpg (US)

Dusty - '89 Bronco
90 day: 14.66 mpg (US)

bigblue - '96 F250 PSD XLT
90 day: 19.97 mpg (US)

90bronco - '90 Bronco XLT
90 day: 16.76 mpg (US)
Definitely Scangauge. Cruise Control will only give better economy if you have extreme problems with your right foot! I "almost" doubt you will find any hypermilers here that use cruise control...very inefficient way to save gas.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:28 PM   #4 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 1,656

Daox's Paseo - '97 Paseo
90 day: 45.63 mpg (US)

Daox's Matrix - '03 Matrix
90 day: 38.82 mpg (US)
Scangauge hands down. Applying a few of the driving techniques here will net you better mileage by far than a cruise control can do. For the average driver who doesn't pay attention to anything and speeds normally, yes, a cruise control will help. For someone who knows what they are doing, the cruise control will actually hurt.
__________________
EcoRenovator.org - Efficient living and green home improvement
Matrix Build Thread
Paseo Build Thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:31 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Exton PA
Posts: 35

Whitey - '03 Cavalier base
90 day: 37.01 mpg (US)
wow ok, i remembered seeing something on a site saying that highway mileage could be increased if cruise was used, by a pretty decent percentage. i had my longest straight ride in my car so far yesterday, about 120 miles each way, so 240miles (or 4 hours in one day) of driving. and it was kinda bothering me that i couldnt just say go to this speed and stay there. but i did get good mileage on the trip regardless, so maybe the gauge is the way to go.

this may be a bad question, but is the gauge accurate? i'd really like to see a running average, and instantanieus(sp?) at the same time if possible.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:54 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
FastPlastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 160

98 Cherokee - '98 Cherokee
90 day: 18.42 mpg (US)

ZX7R Ninja - '99 ZX7R Ninja
90 day: 37.47 mpg (US)
Mine was within .03 gallons and .20 MPG's for the tank when I filled up the first time to calibrate it.

The gauges I normally have up are RPM, Gallons per hour, Instant MPG's and I also have Average MPG's for the current trip.
__________________

Adjusted for my driving habits. 80%city/20%Highway.
20mpg city/30mpg highway or bust! Check out my mods so far
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 03:01 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Exton PA
Posts: 35

Whitey - '03 Cavalier base
90 day: 37.01 mpg (US)
oh so you can edit what you see on the screen? that would be great. is the calibrating hard? im not too experience with this sort of thing. im about to order one right now after seeing the responses here.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 03:03 PM   #8 (permalink)
Dartmouth 2010
 
SVOboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 3,773

Vegan Powa! - '91 CRX DX
90 day: 57.2 mpg (US)
Send a message via AIM to SVOboy Send a message via MSN to SVOboy Send a message via Yahoo to SVOboy Send a message via Skype™ to SVOboy
Sgii!
__________________



------------------------------EcoModder Gear------------------------------

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 03:08 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian03cav View Post
wow ok, i remembered seeing something on a site saying that highway mileage could be increased if cruise was used, by a pretty decent percentage.
Not true, at least if you drive in hills - and I don't remember too many non-hilly places in Pennsylvania :-)

Cruise control tries to hold a steady speed, so what happens on hills is that it will be going along at the set speed on the level, and when it comes to a hill will increase throttle to keep the same speed going up, then back way off on the downside. That's bad for FE.

What you want is to "rollercoaster": speed up before you come to the hill, lose a bit of speed going up, then let gravity speed you up again going down the other side. If you get a ScanGauge, you'll be able to see this in action :-)
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 03:23 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Exton PA
Posts: 35

Whitey - '03 Cavalier base
90 day: 37.01 mpg (US)
made the plunge, ordered the scangauge 2. should be here wensday. cruise would have cost me around $300 if not more anyway, thanks for all the help guys, otherwise i would have gone with the cruise probably.

cant wait to get it and share results.

any tips or things to look out for my first time using it and setting it up?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 03:42 PM   #11 (permalink)
Mr. Blue Tape
 
azraelswrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 332

AzxA - '06 xA
90 day: 42.02 mpg (US)
tips:

When you fill it up, make sure it's around 1/4 of the tank (or less). The first few tanks may be wonky for tank calculations -- for me it overestimated my MPG by a massive degree which is why my fillup adjustment was +12.2%. My last refill the SG was off by +0.1gal so now my adjustment is +13.3%.

If you intend to do any forced autostops or engine-off-coasting, use HYBRID mode but that may not work all the time. The SG prefers the engine running than not to function properly.

Deceleration fuel cutoff (DFCO) is calculated when your engine loop is OPEN, the rpm's are above the cutoff limit plus above the idle throttle position selector*. You know if you have DFCO when your MPG = 9999 or the GPH = 0.00 and most modern fuel-injected vehicles do have it

*idle throttle position selector = when car is idle, the current TPS value

I followed the manual's recommendation and set the "FUEL CUTOFF" value to 14, which is 4 above my idle TPS (10). I note this because I've seen a lot of people confused by this over on CleanMPG so I figure I'd kill the beast before it got loose.

You can make your own customized gauges called Xgauges.
__________________


My 5 pillars of fuel efficiency:
  • driving style
  • aerodynamics
  • tires
  • weight reduction
  • engine maintenance
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 03:53 PM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Exton PA
Posts: 35

Whitey - '03 Cavalier base
90 day: 37.01 mpg (US)
azraelswrd,

so you're saying i should let my tank go to 1/4, then fill up completely, then plug in my sg2? im just trying to understand so i get the best possible results.

i dont plan to turn my car off while driving it, but i have been wondering about the Deceleration fuel cutoff (DFCO) as you called it. does my 2003 cavalier have that? so i should stay in 5th gear when coasting instead of putting the car in neutral? i figured only more expensive cars would have this feature. my car is manual so i was putting it in neutral on long downgrades.

as for the adjustments, did you make those by using the sg2, and keeping track of your mpg the traditional way? then setting the difference in the sg2?

im excited to use it, but nervous im going to mess up the settings. i expect it to arrive on wensday!
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 04:10 PM   #13 (permalink)
Mr. Blue Tape
 
azraelswrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 332

AzxA - '06 xA
90 day: 42.02 mpg (US)
Got ahead of myself. Plug in your SG, then fill up the tank but don't make any adjustments for that FIRST TANK. The next time you refill, wait until you have 1/4 left in the tank and then you can make your fillup adjustments. Adjustments at the fillup are based on the ACTUAL amount of fuel I pumped into the tank at that time so no need for traditional tracking.

ex:
I pumped in 8.747 gallons today. I turn on the Scangauge, go to FILLUP and it says I used 8.6 gallons. I then adjust it to agree with the actual fill amount (8.7) and note the adjustment percentage (+13.3%). That's it.


When you first plug in the SG, you need to calibrate your car info such as engine size, tank size, fuel type and car type. The instructions for the installation are pretty clear.

***
Your Cav should have DFCO. What you do will depend on what you need to do -- if you need to stop soon, I'd coast in gear. If you have a downslope or no stops in the near future, neutral is better. This is where having a SG is really useful but it sounds like you already know what you're doing.

***
I still use traditional tracking of odometer difference and tank amounts to determine my ACTUAL mpg (plus I use that to plug into the [garage]) because the SG is not perfect when it comes to tank calculations. It's close but I rely on it for instant feedback on the road.

***
Don't worry about messing it up.
__________________


My 5 pillars of fuel efficiency:
  • driving style
  • aerodynamics
  • tires
  • weight reduction
  • engine maintenance
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
All content copyright EcoModder.com