Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-25-2008, 01:00 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Exton PA
Posts: 35

Whitey - '03 Chevrolet Cavalier base
90 day: 37.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
which would benefit me more?

trying to decide which would benifit my quest for better economy more. my two options are - -

1. installing cruise control
2. buying a scangauge 2

my car does not have cruise, which i think would help alot with the amount of miles i drive on highway, letting the computer control things. or get the scan gauge so i can monitor things and find out. im not too sure how to go about installing cruise, but i might just call the dealer and find out. if its less then $300 it might be worth it?

what are your inputs? which should i go with?

thanks
Brian

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-25-2008, 01:09 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
FastPlastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 419

98 Cherokee - '98 Jeep Cherokee
90 day: 17.18 mpg (US)

ZX7R Ninja - '99 Kawasaki ZX7R Ninja
90 day: 42.45 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
I would suggest the ScanGauge. Nothing makes the foot lighter then watching the MPG's go down. Plus unless you get the older style cruise control (holds the gas steady rather then the speed) you'll see better results without cruise.

But it all depends on if your foot can handle the long drives.
__________________

Adjusted for my driving habits. 80%city/20%Highway.
20mpg city/30mpg highway or bust! Check out my mods so far
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 01:21 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Briggsdale, Colorado
Posts: 296

Wildfire - '96 Ford Bronco XL
90 day: 14.88 mpg (US)

Blackford - '96 Ford Bronco XLT
90 day: 20.26 mpg (US)

Y2k - '00 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
Team Honda
90 day: 73.98 mpg (US)

Redford V10 - '01 Ford F250 Lariat
90 day: 15.64 mpg (US)

FireFly - '00 Honda Insight DX
90 day: 69.43 mpg (US)

LittleRed - '00 Honda Insight
Thanks: 3
Thanked 31 Times in 14 Posts
Definitely Scangauge. Cruise Control will only give better economy if you have extreme problems with your right foot! I "almost" doubt you will find any hypermilers here that use cruise control...very inefficient way to save gas.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 01:28 PM   #4 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,183

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,483
Thanked 2,552 Times in 1,537 Posts
Scangauge hands down. Applying a few of the driving techniques here will net you better mileage by far than a cruise control can do. For the average driver who doesn't pay attention to anything and speeds normally, yes, a cruise control will help. For someone who knows what they are doing, the cruise control will actually hurt.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 01:31 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Exton PA
Posts: 35

Whitey - '03 Chevrolet Cavalier base
90 day: 37.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
wow ok, i remembered seeing something on a site saying that highway mileage could be increased if cruise was used, by a pretty decent percentage. i had my longest straight ride in my car so far yesterday, about 120 miles each way, so 240miles (or 4 hours in one day) of driving. and it was kinda bothering me that i couldnt just say go to this speed and stay there. but i did get good mileage on the trip regardless, so maybe the gauge is the way to go.

this may be a bad question, but is the gauge accurate? i'd really like to see a running average, and instantanieus(sp?) at the same time if possible.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 01:54 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
FastPlastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 419

98 Cherokee - '98 Jeep Cherokee
90 day: 17.18 mpg (US)

ZX7R Ninja - '99 Kawasaki ZX7R Ninja
90 day: 42.45 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Mine was within .03 gallons and .20 MPG's for the tank when I filled up the first time to calibrate it.

The gauges I normally have up are RPM, Gallons per hour, Instant MPG's and I also have Average MPG's for the current trip.
__________________

Adjusted for my driving habits. 80%city/20%Highway.
20mpg city/30mpg highway or bust! Check out my mods so far
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:01 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Exton PA
Posts: 35

Whitey - '03 Chevrolet Cavalier base
90 day: 37.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
oh so you can edit what you see on the screen? that would be great. is the calibrating hard? im not too experience with this sort of thing. im about to order one right now after seeing the responses here.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:03 PM   #8 (permalink)
Dartmouth 2010
 
SVOboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447

Vegan Powa! - '91 Honda CRX DX
Team Honda
90 day: 66.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 92
Thanked 122 Times in 90 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SVOboy Send a message via MSN to SVOboy Send a message via Yahoo to SVOboy
Sgii!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:08 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian03cav View Post
wow ok, i remembered seeing something on a site saying that highway mileage could be increased if cruise was used, by a pretty decent percentage.
Not true, at least if you drive in hills - and I don't remember too many non-hilly places in Pennsylvania :-)

Cruise control tries to hold a steady speed, so what happens on hills is that it will be going along at the set speed on the level, and when it comes to a hill will increase throttle to keep the same speed going up, then back way off on the downside. That's bad for FE.

What you want is to "rollercoaster": speed up before you come to the hill, lose a bit of speed going up, then let gravity speed you up again going down the other side. If you get a ScanGauge, you'll be able to see this in action :-)
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 02:23 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Exton PA
Posts: 35

Whitey - '03 Chevrolet Cavalier base
90 day: 37.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
made the plunge, ordered the scangauge 2. should be here wensday. cruise would have cost me around $300 if not more anyway, thanks for all the help guys, otherwise i would have gone with the cruise probably.

cant wait to get it and share results.

any tips or things to look out for my first time using it and setting it up?

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com