Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-28-2011, 11:30 PM   #11 (permalink)
OCD Master EcoModder
 
brucepick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern CT, USA
Posts: 1,936

Outasight - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 54.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 431
Thanked 396 Times in 264 Posts
Definitely note down any codes that come up. As Ryland suggested, a mechanic may not be thinking towards exactly the same goal as you.

You can google the codes to find out what they mean - include the year and model of car with the code when you do.

__________________
Coast long and prosper.
Driving '00 Honda Insight, acquired Feb 2016.


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-29-2011, 05:22 AM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
orange4boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The Wet Coast, Kanuckistan.
Posts: 1,275

The Golden Egg - '93 Toyota Previa DX
90 day: 31.91 mpg (US)

Chewie - '03 Toyota Prius
90 day: 57 mpg (US)

The Spaceship - '00 Honda Insight
Thanks: 100
Thanked 306 Times in 178 Posts
A bad O2 sensor can cause high FE and your car is due at 135000km. The fact that the O2 sensor heater is gone is a warning sign that the sensor may be malfunctioning too. Already, without the heater it will put you car in open loop for longer than normal: uses more fuel.

An O2 sensor can be bad and not through a code. Mine was working in reverse a
while back and caused all kinds of strange behaviour including poor mileage so that would be my first suggestion: replace O2 sensors. You can get $ generic ones installed. don't need to get $$$ dealer parts.

The O2 sensors are bolted to your exhaust pipes in front of and behind the catalytic converter. Do em both.
__________________
Vortex generators are old tech. My new and improved vortex alternators are unstoppable.

"It’s easy to explain how rockets work but explaining the aerodynamics of a wing takes a rocket scientist.


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2011, 10:09 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: london, on
Posts: 355

Buggie - '01 Vw Beetle TDI Gls
Thanks: 4
Thanked 37 Times in 27 Posts
Check your front wheel alignment, make sure they both poi t straight. Try to have some one sit in your car when you check. I got an alignment and starts wearing the insides of the tires. Anyways, I usuall use bungee cords to secure 4 foot levels to the rim, and measure behind and in front of the tir. Make sureyou are getting a true reading, tryto stayoff of raised lettering. There should be a 1/16 to 1/8 smaller reading in frot of the tire comparedto behind

another one might be that the car was in an accident and is dogtracking, and it ispushing air with it's side as it goes down the road. If you have bedrails you can check that too, secure them to the rear wheel facing the front and see how far he back to front wheel alignment is off. Or you canget a 4 wheel alignment, but I don't think there is anything adjustable on the back so shops may not check it
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2011, 03:24 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
orange4boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The Wet Coast, Kanuckistan.
Posts: 1,275

The Golden Egg - '93 Toyota Previa DX
90 day: 31.91 mpg (US)

Chewie - '03 Toyota Prius
90 day: 57 mpg (US)

The Spaceship - '00 Honda Insight
Thanks: 100
Thanked 306 Times in 178 Posts
Ha. That's exactly what I did a week ago, Bandit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bandit86 View Post
There should be a 1/16 to 1/8 smaller reading in frot of the tire comparedto behind
For FE it's better to have 0 toe in. Some people claim cars track better with some toe in but I have not found this to be true with radial tires on my cars. If you want rock steady tracking put on an air dam and kill that front end lift. Plus gain some FE.
__________________
Vortex generators are old tech. My new and improved vortex alternators are unstoppable.

"It’s easy to explain how rockets work but explaining the aerodynamics of a wing takes a rocket scientist.


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2011, 10:41 AM   #15 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 13

Jet - '99 Suzuki Swift Hatchback
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ok... Sorry for the delayed response; not abandoning the thread at all, just moved in with my gf and we've been painting/cleaning/moving/going to jays home opener.

So my car is running @ ~90 C (194F) which seems about right, and it gets to that temp within a few minutes of driving.

Closed/open loop seems ok, but it is doing one thing weird. If I'm accelerating hard it is open, but it is also open in another circumstance. Lets say I'm on the hwy going 100kph and I take my foot off the accelorater and coast. It opens when my car coasts.

The codes have yet to return...

Thanks for more info I'll look into all these avenues, starting with sensors.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2011, 07:32 PM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 13

Jet - '99 Suzuki Swift Hatchback
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Alright so another code poped up - P0136 which is apparently P0136 - O2 Sensor Circuit Malfunction (Bank 1 Sensor 2) according. Is this the upstream or downstream sensor?

edit: now it appears to have dissapeared again...weird.

Last edited by acropora1981; 04-06-2011 at 07:58 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2011, 08:17 PM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 13

Jet - '99 Suzuki Swift Hatchback
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
sorry for multiples in one day... looks like that code is for the downstream O2 sensor.

Can someone point me to a decent generic (cheap) pair of O2 sensors that I can replace mine with and and online dealer? Keeping in mind that I am not a mechanic...I need something that will fit my 99 Swift without and kind of modification...
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2011, 11:07 PM   #18 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
If i remember right the swift and metro were quite different cars. swift was a 4 cyl car and the metro (3 cyl) was specificly made as an economy car. I bet the tuneing was for econ on the metro and much more performance on the swift.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com