11-02-2011, 08:42 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
CRX HF EcoTurbo?
Well gentlemen.
Is it worth it to turbocharge a 1990 Honda CRX HF for increased economy?
I read an article in SuperStreet a loonngg time ago, in which a turbo Honda S2000's fuel economy jumped to 38 mpg. All because it took him less time and throttle to achieve highway speed.
I was thinking maybe a Mitsu 13G with an adapter plate to the HF manifold, plumbed straight into the throttlebody with no intercooler. Boost pressure would be low, only 5 psi or so. I would like to retain the factory 240cc injectors.
My biggest concern is tuning with OBD-0.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
11-02-2011, 09:50 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Cyborg ECU
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,174 Times in 1,470 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by office888
Well gentlemen.
Is it worth it to turbocharge a 1990 Honda CRX HF for increased economy?
I read an article in SuperStreet a loonngg time ago, in which a turbo Honda S2000's fuel economy jumped to 38 mpg. All because it took him less time and throttle to achieve highway speed.
I was thinking maybe a Mitsu 13G with an adapter plate to the HF manifold, plumbed straight into the throttlebody with no intercooler. Boost pressure would be low, only 5 psi or so. I would like to retain the factory 240cc injectors.
My biggest concern is tuning with OBD-0.
|
Do you know if it will deliver the power in the low end? That's the key, from what I have read. For the best FE results you will want more power on the lower end of the RPM band and you will want as little delay as possible. This unit offers that?
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.
|
|
|
11-02-2011, 10:56 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
|
Doesn't the CRX HF have pretty high compression ratio already and with a turbo you want to have lower compression on your engine so the increased pressure doesn't cause pre-detonation.
|
|
|
11-03-2011, 01:19 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic
Do you know if it will deliver the power in the low end? That's the key, from what I have read. For the best FE results you will want more power on the lower end of the RPM band and you will want as little delay as possible. This unit offers that?
|
The TD04-13G is fairly small. I can't say for certain due to variables, but full spool at 5 psi would probably be around 2700 rpm. I spend most of my driving in the 1800 to 3500 range. The extra power would be nice for getting onto the highway.
The GT15 would probably be a little more efficient for my needs, and spool a little faster... However, that would increase the price by quite a bit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryland
Doesn't the CRX HF have pretty high compression ratio already and with a turbo you want to have lower compression on your engine so the increased pressure doesn't cause pre-detonation.
|
9.1:1, so not terribly high. There's a lot of guys running 15 psi+ with much bigger turbochargers with that compression.
|
|
|
11-03-2011, 02:19 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by office888
Is it worth it to turbocharge a 1990 Honda CRX HF for increased economy?
|
The short answer is no.
|
|
|
11-03-2011, 03:12 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Cyborg ECU
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,174 Times in 1,470 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox
The short answer is no.
|
I know Daox is right about the financial cost of the turbo charger. It wouldn't pay for itself for a prohibitively long time, if ever. I just looked up the prices on these units. Not any cheaper than others I have causally researched. $2K - $3K is a lot to pay for a little more FE. Your earlier response raises questions too. You say you normally drive in the 1800-3500 RPM range. An HF has taller final drive gearing than the VX and so you might be driving at some high speeds to make 3500 rpms on the freeway. Not all that great for FE. Still, I don't think anyone would dispute that there would be some gains, with modest driving technique changes, and that you would also have access to the power you seem to want. If costs are not part of how you value the mod, go to it. And please post a build thread with testing of results. I know I'd like to read it.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.
|
|
|
11-03-2011, 03:32 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: california
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
A guy on d-series.org boosted his civic for the sole purpose of better FE. He tuned it so that his engine would be in neutral vacuum as much as possible to increase pumping efficiency . He also re-calibrated the fuel maps in his ecu to run in lean burn mode. I forget how many MPG's he was getting but is was up there. I'll try looking him up and post a link if I find it.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to pana For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-03-2011, 07:28 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Cyborg ECU
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,174 Times in 1,470 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pana
A guy on d-series.org boosted his civic for the sole purpose of better FE. He tuned it so that his engine would be in neutral vacuum as much as possible to increase pumping efficiency . He also re-calibrated the fuel maps in his ecu to run in lean burn mode. I forget how many MPG's he was getting but is was up there. I'll try looking him up and post a link if I find it.
|
I found this on that site: I did some FE testing 64.8mpg - D-series.org. Is that the one? If so, he seems to have a turbo for power but relies on lean burn for higher FE on freeway trips. His average FE, tank to tank, would be interesting to know.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.
|
|
|
11-03-2011, 09:47 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
|
I would be surprised if just adding a turbo helped FE in any way.
Using a turbo to bring a car back to "acceptable" performance when something else has been done (e.g., lean-burn, downsizing the motor, etc.) is a well-trodden path to FE. Just ask anyone with a Cruise Eco.
It might be fun to run a 1st-gen Insight 3-cylinder with a turbo in a CRX.
-soD
|
|
|
11-03-2011, 10:57 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,570 Times in 2,834 Posts
|
Gasoline engines don't see much of a FE boost when turbo charged.
If you be good and drive them easy you can milk a few more MPGs out of your vehicle but the mod wont pay for its self.
It would be nice to have more power and MPGs, in that way it could be worth it.
I wouldn't try going non-intercooled.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
|