Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-14-2010, 02:50 PM   #31 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
^^^
For me it's simple. I compromise right up to the point where the tire manufacturer is still liable.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to UFO For This Useful Post:
gone-ot (12-15-2010)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-14-2010, 03:46 PM   #32 (permalink)
Lead-footed Econewbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 52

Ceffy - '97 Nissan Cefiro 25 excimo
90 day: 25.21 mpg (US)

Demio - '07 Mazda Demio Sport
90 day: 30.99 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
I think it depends on the tyre. Tyres design for low RR will probably not gain from extra pressure.

I get an unscientific 6% with 32psi -> 40 psi (41 max sidewall) with Bridgestone sport tourers. These tires are grippy, and perhaps sacrifice rolling resistance for performance, so respond well to more pressure?

The 6% seems to be consistent average any way I do the numbers accross all tanks since I made the change to high pressure. I have a pretty consistent commute, and exclude tanks that include long road trips or highway driving. I ran the manurfacturers pressure for about 10 tanks first. I do lots of low speed coast downs where RR is going to be a big factor.

I find running higher pressure improves steering response and feel - which I prefer. I hate cars that don't feel like the steering is connected to anything, and positioning the car on the road is guesswork - pumping up the pressure will improve your fine control of the car and possibly save your bacon if you have to take evasive action. It's a bit harsh on rough surface and scary on gravel/dirt. :S

Last edited by womprat; 12-14-2010 at 04:07 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2010, 03:57 PM   #33 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Foothills near Denver
Posts: 279

RSX2fast4mpg - '02 Acura RSX Type S
90 day: 38.22 mpg (US)

bubbatrucker - '98 Chevrolet K1500
90 day: 18.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts
In re-reading my own writing I'm re-thinking my own logic... some. My last accident was in 2005. I was driving at 70 mph (65psl) in my 2002 Civic EX that had second season snow tires on. Some bonehead started merging without looking in his/her mirror and coming into my lane, so I started to swerve into the lane next to me, did a quick peek over my shoulder and saw someone coming at about 90mph in that lane only about 50 yards back, I corrected to hold my lane, the car lost traction, I started to spin and the next thing I know I'm sliding backward at 60+mph into the guardrail, bouncing off, into traffic and get broadsided at 50+mph.

In any case, besides the longest run-on sentence in Ecomodder history, I don't know what PSI those tires were at, what brand they were, or anything, but I know I don't want to ever have a car break free that easily again on perfectly dry roads. I'm going to start playing with tire pressure again to find a balance that makes the car handle better, if possible, on dry roads. Snow tires suck on dry roads, but summer tires suck on 3" of hard pack or 10" of powder. Everything has its trade offs and I need to re-evaluate my tire pressure to get the best handling I can get, whether that's 32, 35, 40 or 44psi. I'd suspect in a realistic CBA, two or three mpg is cheaper than my deductable...
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2010, 06:36 PM   #34 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JacobAziza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 397

Big Orange Work Truck - '83 Ford F-250
90 day: 27.54 mpg (US)

Jessica's - '04 Toyota Matrix
90 day: 41.21 mpg (US)

Ninjette - '01 Kawasaki Ninja EX250R
Thanks: 44
Thanked 68 Times in 45 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO View Post
There is safety margin from the sidewall pressure, but it varies with manufacturer, manufacturing process and tire to tire. I don't know where you get your confidence in that much pressure over the limit, but I do not share it; I think you are being reckless. Where did you get the burst data? Certainly NOT from the manufacturer, which would be the one source you might be able to trust.
"over-inflation almost never causes tire failure. The standard tire is inflated to about 30 to 35 pounds per square inch. Under hot weather and highway conditions, the temperature of the air inside the tire rises about 50 degrees. That increases the pressure inside the tire about 5 psi. The burst pressure of a tire is about 200 psi."

Car Talk

"Most new or undamaged medium radial truck tires can withstand three to four times the recommended pressure before bursting. In fact, the rim usually fails before the tire. ITRA has conducted several burst strength tests on new and used medium radial truck tires with special reinforced rims. The tires were pressurized with water. Most recently, three new tires and 13 used tires were "burst tested" with the lowest pressure burst recorded at 300psi and highest at 540psi for an average of 420psi"

At what point will a truck tire burst from overinflation?

I assumed the low "max" pressures were about liability, but it turns out manufacturers don't even set those numbers. They have nothing at all to do with tests of individual tires or what the manufacturer thinks they should be set to. The Tire and Rim association sets the numbers, universally, for a given size tire and weight range, independent of the individual tires construction

Tire Tech Information - Tire Specs Explained
__________________




Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
A few months ago I returned home just as my neighbor pulled into his driveway. It was cold (around freezing) with some rain and sleet, and he yells to me: You rode your bike? In this weather?!?

So the other day we both returned home at the same time again, only now the weather is warm, sunny, with no wind. And I yell to him: You took the car? In this weather?!?
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JacobAziza For This Useful Post:
Piwoslaw (12-15-2010)
Old 12-14-2010, 08:22 PM   #35 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by womprat View Post
I think it depends on the tyre. Tyres design for low RR will probably not gain from extra pressure.
They do.
When coasting I can feel the greater resistance when they are at 36psi rather than at 43 psi or above.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2010, 12:33 AM   #36 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 668 Times in 357 Posts
I had my new Bridgestone Grid 019s inflated to 38 PSI from 30 Recommended on the door, when I went to get the tires balanced after 5000 miles, the yutz at Costco made a note on my paper work that the tires were "Overinflated by 8PSI" with no reference to whether it was based on the door sticker 30PSI or Sidewall 40PSI. I should sue!
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2010, 07:34 AM   #37 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 794
Thanks: 4
Thanked 388 Times in 237 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfg83 View Post
............(CapriRacer, sorry in advance if I am misquoting you)

I agree. CapriRacer commented on Max PSI. I believe that he said something akin to "as long as you drive the way we are driving, sidewall max PSI is ok, but inflation above Max tire PSI is not ok". ...........
Sorry, but that isn't quite right. I hope I am not contradicting myself (I didn't peruse the entire posting), but tire manufacturers do not test above what is known as the "rated" pressure, which for passenger car tires is 35 psi. What is written on the sidewall is the maximum allowable pressure - and the word "allowable" has some special meaning in this context. It assumes that the tires are going to be used in a high speed situation - like the German Autobahn - where the road is designed for such usage - a smooth, debris free, no pot holes, etc surface, where the additional pressure is used to reduced the heat buildup in the tire.

Also, ALL vehicle testing is done at the vehicle tire placard pressure.

Further, while it is true that NEW passenger car tires have bursting pressures over 200 psi, this is a one time event. If you read up on fatigue resistance, you'll find that if something is loaded repeatedly, like rolling the tire with a load, the fatigue resistance drops dramatically. In the range of value normal for tires - 106 cycles - the fatigue resistance is 20 to 25% of the one time value.

Further, I have seen some old tires that burst at 35 psi. Admittedly there were 20+ years old, but the issue is that they deteriorated over time.

But let's look at the specs for the EV1:

Quote:
Originally Posted by cfg83 View Post
............GENERAL MOTORS EV1 VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS
http://avt.inel.gov/pdf/fsev/eva/genmot.pdf
The tires are this vehicle were NOT standard passenger car tires. They were specially designed for this application knowing that the placard specification was for 50 psi. In other words, the tires were specially designed to be able to hold that kind of pressure.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CapriRacer For This Useful Post:
cfg83 (12-15-2010)
Old 12-15-2010, 01:04 PM   #38 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
tim3058's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northeast
Posts: 147

Silver Bullet - '86 Chevy Camaro Z28
90 day: 19.74 mpg (US)

New Blue - '96 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
90 day: 20.46 mpg (US)

Diesel - '96 Chevrolet Tahoe LS
Last 3: 13.56 mpg (US)

Tahoe #2 - '95 Chevrolet Tahoe LS
90 day: 13.05 mpg (US)

SuperDuty - '08 Ford F-350 dually Lariat
90 day: 9.34 mpg (US)

Fundai - '09 Hyundai Elantra
90 day: 26.45 mpg (US)

HRV - '17 Honda HRV LX
90 day: 31.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
UFO et al, I doubt anything happens right at the tire max rating - as someone said, its just the point the mfr wishes to limit their liability. Overinflating a tire by 12% (44~50psi) would be well under the FS JacobAziza quotes in his post (3 to 4x rated pressure). If the mfr rated the tire for its actual bursting/unsafe pressure, then it'd be on the verge of a lawsuit with every tire. I definitely wouldn't be doubling the rated pressure though, as Capri said the tire gets weaker, does the fatigue resistance relate directly to pressure?? (would it be 25% of 200psi, or 75% or ???)
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2010, 01:47 PM   #39 (permalink)
A madman
 
brucey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WV
Posts: 1,018

Pequod - '17 Subaru Outback
90 day: 22.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 73
Thanked 183 Times in 98 Posts
Send a message via AIM to brucey
My tires since new have been ran at max sidewall pressure. Very even wear (actually none to speak of) and no blow outs of any kind. Very predictable handling too. A bit bumper, but nothing to complain about.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2010, 05:35 PM   #40 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JacobAziza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 397

Big Orange Work Truck - '83 Ford F-250
90 day: 27.54 mpg (US)

Jessica's - '04 Toyota Matrix
90 day: 41.21 mpg (US)

Ninjette - '01 Kawasaki Ninja EX250R
Thanks: 44
Thanked 68 Times in 45 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer View Post
Further, while it is true that NEW passenger car tires have bursting pressures over 200 psi, this is a one time event. If you read up on fatigue resistance, you'll find that if something is loaded repeatedly, like rolling the tire with a load, the fatigue resistance drops dramatically. In the range of value normal for tires - 106 cycles - the fatigue resistance is 20 to 25% of the one time value.
The The International Tire and Rubber Association burst tests I linked to that found a minimum burst pressure of over 300psi was (mostly) of used tires, not new ones.

I'd agree that running at, or even remotely close to that for extended periods would be inviting trouble, but, again, the "max" recommendations on the sidewall have literally nothing to do with the individual tires capacity.

The number is set not by the manufacturer or car maker, but by an independent organization that has permanent set standards based on tire size only.

The number really seems to be based more on tradition than any test or safety concern.
It was set once, by law, and never altered (as far as I can gather from the DOT website) since 1948.
Manufacturers have to run speed and durability tests on new tires, but the pressures they run them in are taken as a given.
I can't find any thing explaining what, if anything, the 'max' pressure ratings were originally based on - but it is clearly not anything to do with an individual tire's actual burst pressure, strength, or performance (since, as people here have pointed out, they aren't even tested at any higher pressure to see whether they preform better or last as long or are as strong)

As far as the car's "recommended" pressure on the door jam, as Ralph Nader pointed out back in 1965, that number is based on comfort for passengers, at the expense of safety, efficiency, handling, tire life, etc.

Can anyone find any concrete evidence that running at (or even above) the max rated pressure has any drawback other than a harsh ride and possibly less puncture resistance?

__________________




Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
A few months ago I returned home just as my neighbor pulled into his driveway. It was cold (around freezing) with some rain and sleet, and he yells to me: You rode your bike? In this weather?!?

So the other day we both returned home at the same time again, only now the weather is warm, sunny, with no wind. And I yell to him: You took the car? In this weather?!?
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Top 5 most fuel efficient tires (Lowest Rolling resistance: LRR) blackjackel General Efficiency Discussion 144 01-25-2016 11:39 PM
Discussion on tire efficiency Ernie Rogers General Efficiency Discussion 69 12-27-2014 01:17 PM
Tips needed for eco-driving my diesel truck! nubbzcummins Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 65 12-07-2010 01:37 PM
Bridgestone Tires and LRR gone-ot EcoModding Central 30 05-04-2010 12:31 PM
New Wheels & Tires trikkonceptz Success Stories 9 11-03-2008 02:05 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com