Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > DIY / How-to
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-14-2013, 10:18 AM   #11 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
You haven't addressed anything except the CEL, and a piece of tape over it would take care of that.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-14-2013, 10:32 AM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 29

2013 Matrix 2ZRFE - '13 Toyota Matrix
90 day: 38.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Loock at this page :
Traction Control - How does TC work?

Racelogic is making a traction controle system that cut a part of the power of the engine by disabling a cylinder, and alterning that cylinder so the engine stay in a steady thermal state.

Here is a part of the text:
"Racelogic Traction Control prevents lean burn by removing 100% of the pulsed fuel delivery – essentially the affected cylinder takes a gulp of fresh air; the in-cylinder temperature remains virtually unaffected.

Prolonged fuel cut on one particular cylinder would cause scavenging of the petrol lining the inlet tracts, and when the next full fuel pulse arrived, it would be partially reduced in quantity by the re-wetting of these tracts. RL Traction Control rotates cylinder cutting to prevent this situation from occurring."


It would be perfect to be able to set a dial to cut a % of the fuel. And since it's by pulse, it would be possible to cut different % that 25%(1 cylinder) or 50%(2 cylinder)
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2013, 10:52 AM   #13 (permalink)
Burn lean and prosper\\//
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: scranton pa
Posts: 576

VLX - '93 Honda Civic VLX
Team Honda
90 day: 51.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 55
Thanked 65 Times in 54 Posts
ive often thought about deactivating a cylinder when at idle at a stop light for more than 3 seconds(and only then, NOT driving). i havent used EOC in a while and i dont shut my engine off at lights. i wonder if this way would be usefull. just flip a switch and it keeps running on 3 cylinders, then when you are ready to pull out flip the switch back on and off you go. i dont like the idea of cylinder deactivation while driving.
__________________
Burn lean and prosper \\ //
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2013, 11:15 AM   #14 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 05-14-2013 at 11:58 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2013, 11:48 AM   #15 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 828
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stacygifford View Post
...I have addressed every problem brought up in other threads. (with the exception of pumping losses) ...
Pumping losses are the major problem that has to be addressed. Every other problem is just icing on the cake.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2013, 12:06 PM   #16 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,217
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
Data please.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2013, 12:30 PM   #17 (permalink)
Eco Storm Chaser
 
Stacygifford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Lubbock
Posts: 174

Nemo - '87 Ford Mustang GT
90 day: 27.26 mpg (US)

K-sight - '02 Honda Insight
90 day: 39.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 73 Times in 38 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by t vago View Post
Pumping losses are the major problem that has to be addressed. Every other problem is just icing on the cake.

Its only a 10 min job to pull the valve cover and pull the rocker arms... lol
( I don't plan on doing that)
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2013, 04:53 PM   #18 (permalink)
live, breath, Isuzu-Ds
 
trooper Tdiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: oregon
Posts: 231

puddle jumper - '93 Suzuki sidekick base model

energizer bunny - '86 isuzu trooper base model

Clifford the big red dog - '84 GM S-10 durango
Thanks: 1
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
sounds about what my sidekick did with a near dead hole. 'had 105~ compression'
best i could muster was 22.5 running on 3 of 4.

now that i think about it i should have pulled the power to that injector and would have still gotten the EPA rated mpg number 26. with a near 50% loss in power.
__________________
1 86 T\D trooper with rare GEN 3 rods TRANS FIXED NOW DD
1 86 4WD 5sp pup is 2.3L gas, but plan on 2.2L diesel repower
1 91 trop, long term plan is a group buy of imported Isuzu 4JB1-T 2.8L I-4 engines, hoping to get price down to 2K not 3K plus
1993 sidekick my MPG toy, epa rating 26.
i get 29/31 with stock drive train.

Last edited by trooper Tdiesel; 05-14-2013 at 04:58 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2013, 05:28 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 40.02 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 49.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
Frank's pooh-poohing aside, I still want to see how this works out. I haven't seen all the data, read all the threads, etc. There aren't enough hours in the day, and this is the thread I saw. So keep at it and tell us what you discover. If it simply proves the data as established is right, then no worries. If it comes out you experience a significant improvement, that's interesting and I want to know more.
__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2013, 06:15 PM   #20 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,217
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by elhigh View Post
Frank's pooh-poohing aside, I still want to see how this works out. I haven't seen all the data, read all the threads, etc. There aren't enough hours in the day, and this is the thread I saw. So keep at it and tell us what you discover. If it simply proves the data as established is right, then no worries. If it comes out you experience a significant improvement, that's interesting and I want to know more.
I have always planned on A-B-A testing as soon as I can for data.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com