Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-05-2017, 11:16 AM   #41 (permalink)
Eco Sol
 
Shortie771's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 343
Thanks: 24
Thanked 88 Times in 52 Posts
That's a sucky situation. I hate when they put stop signs at the bottom of hills. I haven't personally had to experience such a steep hill that accelerates the car so much with the engine off and then a stop at the bottom. I don't know what a low speed turn is my car loves the corners. I do have a long hill near me that is perfect for maintaining my speed, but there is a stop light at the bottom and an uphill after the light. I'm getting pretty good at timing it so I don't have to stop and lose all of my momentum to get up the hill. I just wish they would wise up and put roundabouts at the bottom of the hill.

__________________




Best Tank = 42.72 mpg (in the 94 Del Sol)

CR-Z Current Mods:
Max Sidewall PSI
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-16-2017, 05:49 AM   #42 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: pittston, pa
Posts: 175

Eco taco - '21 Toyota Tacoma Sr access cab
90 day: 22.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
All my stop lights at the bottom of the hill by me are those lovely car detecting ones. Sometimes i get lucky where there is a car there and it turns green for them and me before i start breaking. But thats vary rare for me.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2017, 05:53 AM   #43 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: pittston, pa
Posts: 175

Eco taco - '21 Toyota Tacoma Sr access cab
90 day: 22.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
My current weight reduction plans are to clean out, vacumm and shampoo the interior. Get thinner floor mats. After cleaning i think i am going to weigh it to see where i am currently at. Then go over the car front to back on extra pointless things i can delete and not even care about and go from there.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2017, 09:55 AM   #44 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
bobdbilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 83

Knight - '03 Proton Waja
90 day: 37.15 mpg (US)

Whoopee - '01 Proton Wira 1.3 Aeroback
90 day: 38.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 29 Times in 21 Posts
The three door hatch is a good design for city driving. It has a short wheelbase and at 2400 lbs, it would be hard to reduce its weight. I would suggest focusing on items which are most furthest and/or highest from your front axle. Such as spare wheel; if it is steel, change it to alloys from a junkyard but keep the size, PCD same. If the engine has to pull your weight, the most work done is hauling mass which is further from the source of torque. In city driving, this is done quite often. Grab handles for rear passengers, if you have them should be removed. Rear seats; if you peel off the fabric and foam, if its a huge stainless steel plate, make holes. Lots of it. Not too big that the foam would sag too much. If you can afford it; Lexan or Acrylic rear window.

Be aware as the car becomes lighter, it is easier to accelerate. You mentioned physics. If you lose lbs, it is easier to accelerate more than before, therefore you use more or the same force/torque than before the weight loss. Here is where people lose the advantage of lightening the car.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2017, 09:24 AM   #45 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: pittston, pa
Posts: 175

Eco taco - '21 Toyota Tacoma Sr access cab
90 day: 22.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
They make alloy donut rims?
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2017, 12:21 PM   #46 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,077

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)

Oxygen Blue - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 54.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,904
Thanked 2,560 Times in 1,586 Posts
The factory donut in the Insight is alloy, and significantly lighter than even the featherweight stock rims. Member BabyDiesel just posted about collecting 4 of them for his car. You can apparently still install the stock tires on them.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2017, 09:04 PM   #47 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
On this site we have occasionally had the "does weight reduction help fuel economy discussion." A rule of thumb is that the savings come only when you have banked up lots of weight reduction. But there is no way for people with our materials and conditions to test claims. Here is a post that claims 2% savings per 100 US lbs: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...html#post34071 ...that's too optimistic. Here is a post from aerohead on this topic: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...html#post54227

But any benefit, of course, assumes you are in stop/go driving, which you say you are. I cut about 250 pounds from my car, which is a really significant percentage of the weight of my stock 2262lb 1998 Civic DX coupe. Downside: the car is louder inside than I like. I am looking for lightweight ways to reduce noise without reducing the cargo space I gained by deleting everything behind the front seats.

Your idea of lightweight wheels is better: my stock alloys were about 17 pounds and my Civic VX wheels are a hair under 10. At 7 pounds per wheel that's 28 lbs. But it is rotational mass, so most people will at least double the weight in order to estimate total weight savings EFFECT.

But to me the most important thing is realizing that every mod presupposes changes in driving style to realize its benefit, or its maximum benefit. I look at all the mods, including my own driving behaviors, as part of a system. And I look for many many small changes that make for bigger benefits. I think it safe to assume I am seeing some modest 1 or 2% benefit from my radical weight reduction. I can't prove it.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2017, 09:23 PM   #48 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
On this site we have occasionally had the "does weight reduction help fuel economy discussion." A rule of thumb is that the savings come only when you have banked up lots of weight reduction. But there is no way for people with our materials and conditions to test claims.
Actually with the help of a trailer and coast down test you can:

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtamiyaphile View Post
Don't bother.

My van averages 6.7 city (16mph average speed) and on a really bad day 9.7 with a 500kg+ trailer.

If you work that out that's 0.006l/100km per kg.

Those are worst case figures because a trailer also adds rolling resistance, rolling inertia and completely ruins my aero (it's a big tall box). I also EOC normally but rarely do with the trailer.

My van had a 0.33 CD and I coast down tested the van+ trailer at 0.45CD

If I type those numbers into the calculator, I find that with a .33CD I should be getting ~6l/100km at 50km/h, and with a .45CD I should be getting 8.7l/100km. So it seems that my 500kg trailer is only costing me an aero penalty, the weight is doing little to nothing.

A lighter car will sit higher on it's suspension so could actually cost you economy at higher speeds.

So on my new van I happily fitted a heavier radio, speakers, sound proofing and even an active sub, as the comfort, convenience and enjoyment is worth the extra 0.000-0.001l/100km or so it might cost me.
For a hypermiler it's absolutely zero, it might even be negative.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2017, 10:25 PM   #49 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: pittston, pa
Posts: 175

Eco taco - '21 Toyota Tacoma Sr access cab
90 day: 22.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
I agree the only way weight reduction makes a slight gain is when its a large reduction and even better if its rotating mass (for city driving mostly) aero mods are the king ofcourse along with driving efficently. I am currently in the stages of looking and planning aero mods. Since my accent is the gl(blue) model i have the lovely 2 overdrive gears transmission any mod will increase my mpg and it shows. I was getting around 36ish last year in the spring-summer time and ive hit 40 already thanks to no power steering and lighter rims (and some driving skills learned). Saddly i do mostly city-highway ish roads and a small percentage of highway so city mods will help me the most.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2017, 10:28 PM   #50 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: pittston, pa
Posts: 175

Eco taco - '21 Toyota Tacoma Sr access cab
90 day: 22.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
I plan on doing what i can thats cheap or free then going from there. I mean honestly my work is 5 miles away, stores are 5-15 miles away. Fam is 15-120 miles away, and buddys are 3 miles ways so i dont do alot of long distance driving thankfully. And summer time i have 1 of 3 bikes to ride.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com