Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-26-2013, 11:52 AM   #21 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,183
Thanks: 128
Thanked 2,803 Times in 1,969 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Keep in mind that Cd is independent of frontal area; CdA between the two would be revealing.
Correct, for a minute I was thinking in terms of CdA, which now makes me very suspicious of the Escort's low Cd number.

Although I'll admit the Escort must have a low CdA number compared to most of the cars on the road today based on it's size alone.

Maybe the author of the article made the same mistake? That would not account for the published Cd numbers though.

Mystery.

__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-26-2013, 01:01 PM   #22 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
No mystery; the Cd is the Cd. CdA would be a very different number- too different to be confused with Cd.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2013, 09:07 PM   #23 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,183
Thanks: 128
Thanked 2,803 Times in 1,969 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Ummmm...
'84 Escort = .36 Cd (or .38- depends on source: 1983 -1985 Ford Escort GT Turbo: The Trickle Down Effect | Autopolis )
'12 Rustang = .36 Cd
Allow me to clarify, the mystery is how these two cars could have closely matching Cd numbers when one is a box (Escort), and the other is only a box from the top of the tires down (Mustang).
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2013, 11:26 AM   #24 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Motor City
Posts: 281
Thanks: 0
Thanked 223 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kach22i View Post
Allow me to clarify, the mystery is how these two cars could have closely matching Cd numbers when one is a box (Escort), and the other is only a box from the top of the tires down (Mustang).
I think you got it right there (the bold above). The '12 Mustang is better aerodynamically than the '05 version, which was even boxier. I know first hand the '05 car was all about retro styling, not aero.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 01:00 PM   #25 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,232

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,231 Times in 1,721 Posts
UltArc, have you been able to make any progress? I am really excited for your build!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 02:32 PM   #26 (permalink)
Hydrogen > EV
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NW Ohio, United States
Posts: 2,025

Silver Flea - '05 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.96 mpg (US)
Thanks: 994
Thanked 402 Times in 285 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
UltArc, have you been able to make any progress? I am really excited for your build!
Absolutely zero progress! Each evening I plan to do my underbody at my local shop, but then he is occupied with a vehicle. We are tentatively planning today...

But I am putting off the kammback until my underbody is done. I am torn between doing it or not, but I still really want to complete it. I have all the materials I think I will need. I'll see more after I finish the underbody and I can evaluate my coroplast supply.
__________________





Best Tanks:
Mustang - 54.83 mpg (US) at the Green Grand Prix
Insight - 82.91966 mpg (US) over 818.5 miles.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 04:59 PM   #27 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,232

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,231 Times in 1,721 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by UltArc View Post
Absolutely zero progress! Each evening I plan to do my underbody at my local shop, but then he is occupied with a vehicle. We are tentatively planning today...

But I am putting off the kammback until my underbody is done. I am torn between doing it or not, but I still really want to complete it. I have all the materials I think I will need. I'll see more after I finish the underbody and I can evaluate my coroplast supply.
Good luck!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013, 11:31 PM   #28 (permalink)
Hydrogen > EV
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NW Ohio, United States
Posts: 2,025

Silver Flea - '05 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.96 mpg (US)
Thanks: 994
Thanked 402 Times in 285 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
Good luck!
Got the underbody done! It looks great, but I am worried about its durability to under carriage heat.
__________________





Best Tanks:
Mustang - 54.83 mpg (US) at the Green Grand Prix
Insight - 82.91966 mpg (US) over 818.5 miles.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2013, 12:43 AM   #29 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,232

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,231 Times in 1,721 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by UltArc View Post
Got the underbody done! It looks great, but I am worried about its durability to under carriage heat.
No pictures? I thought that we were friends!

Those would have been better when it was on the lift, of course...

I guess that I should have thought of that before...

Even though the mechanic did it, will you please describe the materials that you bought and how he did it?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2013, 07:12 PM   #30 (permalink)
Hydrogen > EV
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NW Ohio, United States
Posts: 2,025

Silver Flea - '05 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.96 mpg (US)
Thanks: 994
Thanked 402 Times in 285 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
No pictures? I thought that we were friends!

Those would have been better when it was on the lift, of course...

I guess that I should have thought of that before...

Even though the mechanic did it, will you please describe the materials that you bought and how he did it?
I have been crunched for time, and the few photos I was able to take were while he was dropping it, as we were rushing. And, they are on my mobile phone.

Long story-
Planned to take an hour, as he was supposed to help/do it.
He didn't help, and it was up too high and I was without my tools/equipment.
SO, it took almost two hours. I used three poly carbonate portions.
Rear was a four by eight piece- cut to slide up and into my rear valance.
The next was four feet wide, but I don't know the length-it was two inches over lapping my rear panel, and up to the cross bar just behind my engine-so only the front panel needs to be removed for an oil change.
The front panel was 32 inches by 26ish.

I just used metal pieces to attach it. I made six cuts in the board for one attachment, as it was in a shape like an E, except there were two =, and one |

So my metal pieces looked like this:
|=

Then I placed it underneath, and ran the zip tie though the board, over the component on the vehicle, back through the board, and secured, the metal piece closest to the ground, then board, then car underbody.

The front piece uses four attach points, the second uses five, and the third uses seven. Images to come!

__________________





Best Tanks:
Mustang - 54.83 mpg (US) at the Green Grand Prix
Insight - 82.91966 mpg (US) over 818.5 miles.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com