Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-10-2011, 01:18 AM   #61 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: California
Posts: 44

96SATSL - '96 Saturn Sl1 Base
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 5 Posts
Had a thought on the way home... Would a vehicle get better fuel efficiency while running a higher octane gasoline? Just wondering if anyone has tested the effects.

-Alex

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-10-2011, 01:31 AM   #62 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
CigaR007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 706

GreenTurtle (Retired) - '01 Toyota Echo Sedan
90 day: 44.85 mpg (US)

Zulu - '14 Honda CR-Z
90 day: 49.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 152
Thanked 267 Times in 162 Posts
I believe that running a higher octane increases efficiency provided that you boost the compression ratio. If the CP remains the same and the octane rating increases, odds are it won't boost fuel efficiency.

Wisdom dictates that you should use the recommended octane as specfified in your car's owner manual.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2011, 01:42 AM   #63 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: California
Posts: 44

96SATSL - '96 Saturn Sl1 Base
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CigaR007 View Post
I believe that running a higher octane increases efficiency provided that you boost the compression ratio. If the CP remains the same and the octane rating increases, odds are it won't boost fuel efficiency.

Wisdom dictates that you should use the recommended octane as specfified in your car's owner manual.
Well that answers that , good to know. No need to experiment.
-Alex
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2011, 10:35 AM   #64 (permalink)
Transient
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Thomaston, CT
Posts: 23

Commuter Plus - '98 Saturn SW2
Last 3: 37.12 mpg (US)

Rover - '07 Land Rover LR3 HSE
Last 3: 17.6 mpg (US)

Blackie - '16 Ford Focus Titanium Hatchback
90 day: 33.25 mpg (US)

Bertha - '11 Four Winds Chateau 31a
90 day: 7.79 mpg (US)

Van - '15 Honda Odyssey EX
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
CigaR007 - I'm not there yet, but what if someone had a wideband and programmable ECU and was going to shoot for as lean a cruise as possible. I assume higher octane will allow advanced timing without ping, but will it be less prone to ignite at all with too lean of a mixture? I guess I can wait to see if I ever get the Megasquirt hooked up and experiment myself.

96SATSL - I assume your spats and garage door seal is just attached with small, self tapping screws? I guess you went in to the metal underbody and not in to the plastic trim?
Also spats are just in front of the wheels, there's nothing behind them to help with bringing the flow back together?

You underbody mates in well with the plastic trim/bumper pieces, is that all just epoxied to make it look that smooth? I like how you avoided the exhaust, I had always wondered how best to do that. Did you just leave a hole for oil and filter changes? I need to find some coroplast...

Great numbers, great thread, thanks.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2011, 02:14 PM   #65 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: California
Posts: 44

96SATSL - '96 Saturn Sl1 Base
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by itjstagame View Post
CigaR007 - I'm not there yet, but what if someone had a wideband and programmable ECU and was going to shoot for as lean a cruise as possible. I assume higher octane will allow advanced timing without ping, but will it be less prone to ignite at all with too lean of a mixture? I guess I can wait to see if I ever get the Megasquirt hooked up and experiment myself.

96SATSL - I assume your spats and garage door seal is just attached with small, self tapping screws? I guess you went in to the metal underbody and not in to the plastic trim?
Also spats are just in front of the wheels, there's nothing behind them to help with bringing the flow back together?

You underbody mates in well with the plastic trim/bumper pieces, is that all just epoxied to make it look that smooth? I like how you avoided the exhaust, I had always wondered how best to do that. Did you just leave a hole for oil and filter changes? I need to find some coroplast...

Great numbers, great thread, thanks.
itstagame,

The spats are attached to the wheelwell liners, and the front dam and side skirts extensions are make with using the seal which I attached to clear L channel extrusion typically used for corners of walls indoors. That provided enough rigidity and 2 surfaces, one to fasten the seal and the other to attach to the car. Not sure about your question on the spats?

"...plastic trim/bumper pieces, is that all just epoxied to make it look that smooth?"

Everything is attached with screws for easy removal. Not sure which part you are asking about. By being removable, i can access filter easily.

-Alex

Last edited by 96SATSL; 11-10-2011 at 02:18 PM.. Reason: co..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2011, 11:03 PM   #66 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CigaR007 View Post
I believe that running a higher octane increases efficiency provided that you boost the compression ratio. If the CP remains the same and the octane rating increases, odds are it won't boost fuel efficiency.

Wisdom dictates that you should use the recommended octane as specfified in your car's owner manual.
You can also advance the timing significantly with higher octane gas, so tuning would be required. Regardless, you can't just throw higher octane gas into the tank and expect better mileage.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2011, 01:19 PM   #67 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
96SATSL -

I cross-posted your thread into saturnfans (I hope that's ok) :

SaturnFans Forums - View Single Post - Wheel Skirts

There are a lot of saturnfans that speculate on what they could do with a bone-stock SL1 and your mods will also appeal to their OEM POV.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2011, 04:41 PM   #68 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: California
Posts: 44

96SATSL - '96 Saturn Sl1 Base
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 5 Posts
Nice sounds good
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 01:49 PM   #69 (permalink)
VWCw
 
VWCw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 25

10 Jetta V - '10 Volkswagen Jetta
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
From poking around the Ecomodder site, it sounds like Saturns take pretty well to warm air intakes - tricking the ECU into running lean by routing the air intake near the exhaust manifold. Maybe this works well with Saturns because their engines are in backwards (who puts the exhaust facing the front, and anything you would need to get at [alternator, water pump, oil filter, etc.] in the back of the engine bay, anyways?).

Also, again from other EM threads, it also sounds like a taller 5th gear swap is relatively easy to do without pulling the transmission.
__________________
Luck is probability taken personally.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2011, 05:16 PM   #70 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: California
Posts: 44

96SATSL - '96 Saturn Sl1 Base
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 5 Posts
Hi everyone,

For the last few days I've been driving around a Nissan Leaf, and wow is it a lifestyle change. I have it for about a week and a half. Will do a little write up once my week of driving is done. Honestly I'd rather have the Saturn as the daily. So far estimates for power and quick charging are equaling the cost of operation on the 50+ MPG Saturn.

-Alex

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com