Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-02-2011, 01:48 PM   #231 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Cali is probably OK but in some places if the cops see you w/o fenders and/or bumpers YOU WILL PAY THEM (ask me how I know).

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-02-2011, 02:02 PM   #232 (permalink)
Quasi-Modder
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: DeForest, Wisconsin
Posts: 144
Thanks: 23
Thanked 25 Times in 12 Posts
O.K. Frank, how do you know?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 02:20 PM   #233 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Well I have a VW Bug. And I used to get the VW magazines which all seemed to feature the "Cal Look"- that means nerf bars instead of factory bumpers. Some ***whole MN cop decided that was no bumpers and I guess there was a statute he used to write me a ticket for that grievous offense that Harmed The Great State Of Mn.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 04:35 PM   #234 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,164
Thanks: 121
Thanked 2,792 Times in 1,961 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven7 View Post
I would like to introduce you guys to Google Search by Image.
I found out about that Google feature last month from my wife. It's awesome.

Tineye used to be good, now it just sucks, I'll never go back to it.
.................................................. ...................

Bumpers are a good idea, but not having them really only hurts the driver and passengers. It should be a matter of choice in my opinion.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 04:50 PM   #235 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtkid2002 View Post
Those little racers look just about exactly what I'd love to build. But would a body that covered the wheels be better or having them exposed like they are?
Yes, covered wheels are almost always more aero than exposed wheels. Even counting any extra frontal area you have to add to do that.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 05:28 PM   #236 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kach22i View Post
Bumpers are a good idea, but not having them really only hurts the driver and passengers. It should be a matter of choice in my opinion.
Bumpers do little if anything for occupant protection. They're supposedly for some measure of protection for the CAR so that every little thing doesn't send it to the body shop.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 05:57 PM   #237 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
gtkid2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA - WA
Posts: 110

The Bug - '69 Volkswagen Bug Base
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Luckily since the chassis is a '75, and they still used oldish style bumpers, I'm thinking a large section of square steel tubing will be enough to at least pass as a bumper. Something like that could be easily tucked under the aero skin as well.


And since covered wheels seem to be a bit more of the way to go, a bumper will be a safer option and provide a mounting point. That and they'll cover the wheels. I always wondered how the rat-rods got away with the exposed wheel look.
__________________
I suck at coding! Woo!

1969 VW Bug - Daily Driver
1975 VW Baja - Current Project
Priors:
1989 Honda Prelude Si 4WS (RIP)
1995 Honda Prelude Si (Traded)
1980 Fiat Spider 2000 (Sold)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 06:00 PM   #238 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
I always wondered how the rat-rods got away with the exposed wheel look.
Me too. I don't recall seeing any fenderless, bumperless Model A and T rods pulled over and ticketed for that.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 06:02 PM   #239 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
gtkid2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA - WA
Posts: 110

The Bug - '69 Volkswagen Bug Base
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
At least in WA it might have something to do with the plates. Since they're not daily drivers, they don't have to buy yearly tabs, and I think special rules apply to them. Everywhere else however, I have no clue.
__________________
I suck at coding! Woo!

1969 VW Bug - Daily Driver
1975 VW Baja - Current Project
Priors:
1989 Honda Prelude Si 4WS (RIP)
1995 Honda Prelude Si (Traded)
1980 Fiat Spider 2000 (Sold)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 07:27 PM   #240 (permalink)
Aero Wannabe
 
COcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738

TDi - '04 VW Golf
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 52.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 705
Thanked 218 Times in 169 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackMcCornack View Post
I'm easing my way to a Kamm back, currently MAX has Bonneville spoilers top and bottom. And 115 mpg at a steady 45mph.



45mph was the minimum for the X Prize roundy-round race, and it's also the usual freeway speed lower limit, so I took it as my success-or-failure benchmark speed. At 55, I'm just barely under 100 mpg and at 50 mph I'm slightly over 100 mpg.

I'm confident I could break 100 mpg at 55 if I'd...

--do my mileage tests without unnecessary weight on board (no luggage and less fuel would knock off a hundred pounds)
--close in the back and sides of the stern
--add spats to the rear fenders
--cover the front wheels with pizza pans (I lack the fender overhang I'd need for Basjoos-style front spats)
--put a fairing on the headrest/rollbar
--put a tonneau over the passenger's seat
--do my testing in warm calm weather
--put the mirrors inside the windscreens

...and probably any three of the above would tip the scales.

But I'm probably going to pursue weatherproofing before I get into much more ecomodding. It doesn't matter how good the mileage is if I don't drive it, and non-roadster season is rapidly approaching. Besides, once mileage is sniffing at triple digits, the rewards from improvements diminish. The difference between 95 mpg and 100 mpg is a gallon every couple thousand miles.
This car started out as an open wheel replica but it got a rebody in an effort to improve aero and mpg.

__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com