Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-04-2012, 06:36 PM   #31 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,267
Thanks: 24,392
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
all that much

Quote:
Originally Posted by woodstock74 View Post
I don't know man, I really don't think they're doing all that much tunnel testing/CFD. At least not for the lower tier "econo boxes". If they were we'd struggle to find gains. In my career we'd spend hours in the wind tunnel and be happy to walk out with 1% reduction in drag. But this was on a highly refined race car. People on these forums are finding chunks without resorting to drastic changes (and they're finding huge chunks when they do). This speaks to a fundamental lack of development and refinement. We have to face it, cars are designed these days by accountants and focus groups. Yes, there are the exceptions: where it's profitable and can be used as a selling point.
A point made by styling chiefs decades ago,was that if $billions were required to push up mpg with a new engine,a few $million could do the same with streamlining.
Since CAFE is measured on a sales-weighted basis for the automakers 'fleet',if these econoboxes ARE optimized for mpg,without affecting styling,then the better mpg here,allows more sales of highly profitable lower mpg designs.
So actually,the bean-counters drive the streamlining based on profit motive,share value to the stockholder,corporate image,marketing advantage,and compliance with EPA regulations.
Sure it's been a slow incremental process but when you consider that the cheapest car sold today could embarrass a Corvette of my college days,there has been advances.
Hucho put an airdam kinda like yours on a VW 1600 and it raised the Cd by 0.04.
There is no a priori knowledge about how any production car might react to any particular modification.We mod at our own peril.
Given market competition I would be very reluctant to presume that any of today's automakers are attaching anything to their cars arbitrarily.It would be antithetical to capitalism.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
baldlobo (05-05-2012)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-05-2012, 02:08 PM   #32 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 134

TBD - '17 Toyota Corolla LE
90 day: 41.73 mpg (US)

Starship - '08 Toyota Prius
90 day: 47.14 mpg (US)

Starship Resurrected - '08 Toyota Prius
90 day: 47.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 146
Thanked 110 Times in 47 Posts
Once I hit upon the best depth I'm going to convert the carbon extension to something more curb friendly. What plastic would be best for that? ABS? Or some kind of stiff rubber?

Last edited by woodstock74; 05-05-2012 at 02:33 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2012, 02:51 PM   #33 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,267
Thanks: 24,392
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
chin

Quote:
Originally Posted by woodstock74 View Post
Once I hit upon the best depth I'm going to convert the carbon extension to something more curb friendly. What plastic would be best for that? ABS? Or some kind of stiff rubber?
ABS is great material but will shred or bust in a nasty ground strike.Corvettes,Trans Ams,and New Beetles can't seem to hold onto their's.
I stumbled onto some urethane foam shop floor pad material at BIG-LOTs back in the tool and hardware section.You get about 16 Ft SQ for $15 (US).It's gray in color and has a star-plate kinda pattern on one side.I flipped it and used the smooth side.It bends onto curbs nearly every day for 2-years now and has held up well to the U.V.Since it's a neutral density gray 'color' it goes with any body color.
I've recycled chin spoiler material off Volvos out of boneyards.It had a perfect stiffness vs flexibility.But I really like this foam floor pad.
The plastic lawn edging will do also.I've used it all.
PS,Big Dave has used rubber conveyor belt material to good effect if you can find a local source for that.And it's black.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2012, 03:23 PM   #34 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,179
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
....urethane foam shop floor pad material
I'll have to try this material when extending my own front spoiler.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2012, 07:54 PM   #35 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,016

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 48.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
McMaster-Carr, McMaster-Carr, has many different types of conveyor belting. One type is listed as "impact and abrasion" resistant. That belt should make an air dam that will tolerate hitting the road.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2012, 08:08 PM   #36 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 134

TBD - '17 Toyota Corolla LE
90 day: 41.73 mpg (US)

Starship - '08 Toyota Prius
90 day: 47.14 mpg (US)

Starship Resurrected - '08 Toyota Prius
90 day: 47.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 146
Thanked 110 Times in 47 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMichler View Post
McMaster-Carr, McMaster-Carr, has many different types of conveyor belting. One type is listed as "impact and abrasion" resistant. That belt should make an air dam that will tolerate hitting the road.
That impact and abrasion resistant stuff is $8+/foot. I'm looking at the General Purpose PVC 4" width, $1.62/foot. As this is a "belt" I take it it has a lot of flexibility? When I think of PVC I tend to think of rigid (shatter prone in impact) PVC pipes.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2012, 11:29 PM   #37 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 134

TBD - '17 Toyota Corolla LE
90 day: 41.73 mpg (US)

Starship - '08 Toyota Prius
90 day: 47.14 mpg (US)

Starship Resurrected - '08 Toyota Prius
90 day: 47.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 146
Thanked 110 Times in 47 Posts
Thought I was going to be clever tonight and lower the airdam another 2"...well, it doesn't clear the driveway. And another 1" doesn't either. So back to baseline. Only have about 1/4" clearance there (it's pretty steep). So I think it imperative to get something with a little impact resistance and I'll be looking at those belts. Need to think of what MkII airdam will be though (always looking to improve...).
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2012, 11:40 PM   #38 (permalink)
Sport Compact Driver
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Lolo Mt
Posts: 623

Celica Gts - '84 Toyota Celica Gts
Sports Cars
90 day: 26.32 mpg (US)

The Bee - '96 Mazda B4000 4x4 Base
Pickups
90 day: 20.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 62 Times in 55 Posts
I really like the design you have right now. The only thing I personally would do is widen it, go about half way across the tires on each side and call it good.
I dont think going any lower will help.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2012, 11:53 PM   #39 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 134

TBD - '17 Toyota Corolla LE
90 day: 41.73 mpg (US)

Starship - '08 Toyota Prius
90 day: 47.14 mpg (US)

Starship Resurrected - '08 Toyota Prius
90 day: 47.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 146
Thanked 110 Times in 47 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sporty Modder View Post
I really like the design you have right now. The only thing I personally would do is widen it, go about half way across the tires on each side and call it good.
I dont think going any lower will help.
Problem is finding attachment points beyond the current width. Currently I've attached the airdam to the floor insert I made. I'm thinking MkII might entail attaching brackets to the perimeter of the bumper return. This would move the airdam forward of the current location and would allow me to widen it. I'll have a think.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 12:07 AM   #40 (permalink)
Sport Compact Driver
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Lolo Mt
Posts: 623

Celica Gts - '84 Toyota Celica Gts
Sports Cars
90 day: 26.32 mpg (US)

The Bee - '96 Mazda B4000 4x4 Base
Pickups
90 day: 20.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 62 Times in 55 Posts
Can you show /describe how it is attached now?

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com