Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-13-2018, 03:41 PM   #11 (permalink)
NatGasser
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Calabasas, CA, USA
Posts: 13

CNG Civic - '11 Honda Civic GX (Compressed Natural Gas)
90 day: 41.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Have you looked at checking proper engine mounting height and tried different props?

You're a little underpowered probably. I have a '96 Boston Whaler Dauntless 15 with a Honda BF60 4-stroke and get 8-9mpg. I think my boat is bigger, has a sharper bow and more deadrise (less efficient). Mine tops out at 35mph, planes at a little over 10mph and cruises comfortably at 20mph/4ish KRPM.

If you can find something with a bit more umph but not much heavier, that may change your ride significantly. What is the hull rated for?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-15-2018, 06:53 PM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding flying lizard
 
Daschicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 743

Cibbie - '88 Honda CBR 250R
Motorcycle
90 day: 48.49 mpg (US)

Rarity - '06 Honda Accord EX V6
Team Honda
90 day: 29.88 mpg (US)

Baby viff - '86 Honda VFR 400R
Motorcycle
90 day: 42.15 mpg (US)

Latios - '08 Suzuki SV650SF
Motorcycle
90 day: 64.56 mpg (US)

Mazda 3 - '14 Mazda 3 i Sport
90 day: 43.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 618
Thanked 264 Times in 176 Posts
I was actually reading up on this subject earlier, and chances are boat efficiency is very closely related to airplane efficiency. One big thing I found is that jet drives are not as efficient as props. Just like planes, you will gain efficiency from large diameter 2 blade props, more blades=more turbulence.

No idea on hull design and water interference yet, haven’t looked into that enough.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrey View Post
You're a little underpowered probably. I have a '96 Boston Whaler Dauntless 15 with a Honda BF60 4-stroke and get 8-9mpg.
That is really disappointing. I believe the BF60 engine is closely based on the 1st gen insight engine, and comes with lean burn.
__________________
-Kaze o tatakaimasen-

Best trip in V6: 52.0
Best tank in V6: 46.0
Best tank in Mazda: 49.9
Best tank in CBR: 61.3
Best tank in SV: 83.9

Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
You can lead a fashion-conscious horse to unusual-looking water...

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2018, 10:53 PM   #13 (permalink)
JSH
AKA - Jason
 
JSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,601

Adventure Seeker - '04 Chevy Astro - Campervan
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,147 Times in 1,454 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hersbird View Post
https://newatlas.com/yanmar-dtorque-...utboard/51675/

Its great but $25,000+ for 50hp buys an endless supply of gas.
I would say this closer to the ecomodder solution:

  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to JSH For This Useful Post:
Daschicken (07-16-2018), freebeard (07-17-2018), slowmover (07-17-2018)
Old 07-17-2018, 12:47 AM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
here is a little calculator to play with. It really depends on the type of hull. You can underpower (or throttle down) and efficient displacement hull and get great results. Just like slowing down a car because of aero drag but it's much more drastic with water. A 30 foot displacement hull has a theoretical top speed of 9.2 knots if you put 81 horsepower to it, but to go 8.3 knots on the same boat you only need 38 HP. If 5.5 knots was enough it only takes 8 HP.

Now on a 20' planing hull it takes 210 HP to reach 35 knots. Dropping down to 75 HP will go 15.2 knots. Down below 40 HP it turns into a poor displacement hull design and goes slower on the same power as the bigger heavier 30' displacement hull.

once you know the horsepower required for what speed you can figure engine efficiency and get a MPG.

Boat Speed Calculator

I also plugged in my ship the USS Carl Vinson for fun. The US Navy always says 30+ knots, but if you put enough HP to that hull it is capable of 65 knots. That would require almost 1.8 million HP. Well it doesn't have that much but it does has an advertised 260,000 HP which would be good for 37 knots (which is pushing 43 mph). I can't confirm or deny that number but physics is physics.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Hersbird For This Useful Post:
hayden55 (07-17-2018), redpoint5 (07-17-2018), slowmover (07-17-2018)
Old 07-17-2018, 03:49 AM   #15 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,819

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 43.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,480 Times in 3,445 Posts
I just wonder why boats are always cut off flat in the back rather than achieving a teardrop shape? Shouldn't the pointy end face aft? Liquid fluid dynamics must not directly mimic gas fluid dynamics.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2018, 01:02 PM   #16 (permalink)
JSH
AKA - Jason
 
JSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,601

Adventure Seeker - '04 Chevy Astro - Campervan
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,147 Times in 1,454 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
I just wonder why boats are always cut off flat in the back rather than achieving a teardrop shape? Shouldn't the pointy end face aft? Liquid fluid dynamics must not directly mimic gas fluid dynamics.
Displacement hulls do have rounded backs.

For a planing hull the design objective is to get as much of the hull out of the water as possible to reduce drag.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JSH For This Useful Post:
redpoint5 (07-19-2018)
Old 07-17-2018, 03:31 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,171

Sport Utility Prius - '10 Toyota Prius II
90 day: 52.98 mpg (US)

300k Sequoia 4WD - '01 Toyota Sequoia Limited 4wd
90 day: 20.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 352
Thanked 268 Times in 215 Posts
Can anybody explain how to use that calc for a 15' flat bottom? lol
__________________
"I feel like the bad decisions come into play when you trade too much of your time for money paying for things you can't really afford."
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2018, 10:19 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 678
Thanks: 20
Thanked 146 Times in 130 Posts
What's a boat?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2018, 09:09 AM   #19 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angel And The Wolf View Post
What's a boat?
A 1969 Deuce-and-a-quarter.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to slowmover For This Useful Post:
Fat Charlie (07-20-2018)
Old 07-19-2018, 08:34 PM   #20 (permalink)
sid
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 202

grayranger - '10 Ford Ranger XL 2 door supercab
90 day: 31.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 27
Thanked 48 Times in 28 Posts
It's easy to get great fuel economy from a boat. You just need the right boat, like a canoe, kayak, or a sailboat.

__________________
2010 Ford Ranger, extra cab, 2.3 liter
http://www.stonemarmot.com

Band's latest song/music video "I Sing Along"
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com