07-02-2018, 04:23 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,171
Thanks: 352
Thanked 268 Times in 215 Posts
|
Anybody in here mess with getting better FE out of Boats?
Boats are pretty thirsty an inefficient. I'm looking into ideas to get my 1538 1970s fisher water rover with a 1989 yamaha 30hp outboard to get better mpg. What ideas have you guys tried?
__________________
"I feel like the bad decisions come into play when you trade too much of your time for money paying for things you can't really afford."
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
07-02-2018, 05:21 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 982
Thanks: 271
Thanked 385 Times in 259 Posts
|
There are really only two areas you could look at.
The first is engine efficiency.
The second is your hydro-dynamic drag.
Both are complex.
I prefer sailboats but if you want to optimize on the water fuel economy, you have to design from the water up.
Foils that lift the hull out of the water reduce hydro-dynamic drag tremendously. Then, with reduced drag, you can outline an engine design that minimizes fuel use at that reduced drag.
If speeds get high enough, then you can start down the road of reducing your aerodynamic drag.
|
|
|
07-02-2018, 09:57 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
|
Water drag is much worse than aero drag and you have both with the boat. I assume with just 30hp it doesn't come up on a plane but I could be wrong. If it does plane you want to get it on a plane and then back off some to save gas but maintain the plane. If it isn't planing but the hull is designed to you need more power to make it happen or lighten things up and hope. Make sure its operating in the motors designed range as well, if it over revs you need more pitch on the prop and if it never revs all the way you need less pitch.
|
|
|
07-02-2018, 11:40 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,771
Thanks: 4,320
Thanked 4,474 Times in 3,439 Posts
|
I took the Jetski out on a new-to-me lake last summer, got to the end, and turned around to head back. 5 minutes into the ride back, I had to switch over to reserve. Thinking I would conserve fuel I backed off to about half speed. 15 minutes later I was out. 3 hours later I had swam the boat back to dock.
Someone told me 2-stroke motors want to run at near full-throttle to get the most power out of the fuel. I'm not sure what is most efficient, and haven't seen a BSFC for 2-strokes.
All that said, I think reducing weight is probably most important if you can't change the hull shape.
Last edited by redpoint5; 07-02-2018 at 11:46 PM..
|
|
|
07-03-2018, 03:15 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,747
Thanks: 75
Thanked 577 Times in 426 Posts
|
Diesel engine?
|
|
|
07-03-2018, 03:41 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 982
Thanks: 271
Thanked 385 Times in 259 Posts
|
Bingo!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stubby79
Diesel engine?
|
Fuel efficiency in a hot pocket pouch.
|
|
|
07-04-2018, 07:34 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
|
Some years back I found I intriguing a 30’ turbodiesel with Anderson drive prop a “high” mpg commuter. Hawaiian Islands, IIRC. Both of those were new enough (fir a small package).
One has to start from scratch. And optimize steady state cruise. It’s start and stop that kills boat FE.
|
|
|
07-11-2018, 07:23 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,566
Thanks: 8,094
Thanked 8,883 Times in 7,330 Posts
|
Operating at the interface between air and water, you want a hull that optimizes for both.
https://www.brighthubengineering.com...ull-technolgy/
Quote:
Construction and Working
The design of M hull consists of three main features as follows:
the central displacement section
the planing tunnels
rigid skirts
The central displacement section is what supports the vertical skirts that are attached through out the structure. The design is made in such a way that the skirts are able to capture the hull waves inside the planing tunnel. The incoming bow waves spirals along the planing tunnels and trap the incoming air, forcing it towards the aft.
The planing tunnels also have a slope moving downwards to compress the aerated water for forming the air cushion and reducing the drag. This air cushion increases with the speed of the boat, thus providing additional thrust to the vessel and also reducing the fuel intake.
|
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
07-13-2018, 03:44 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,171
Thanks: 352
Thanked 268 Times in 215 Posts
|
Apparently typical bsfc is on plane 5000rpm at throttle valve fully open (volumetric efficiency) with a mpg prop... big prop that wont let the motor rev up. So currently I run 100% throttle, 5000 rpm (max hp is 5500... max rpm is 6000 rpm). And.... I get a whopping 9 mpg lol. 15' flat bottom 25 mph. 90s yamaha 2s 30hp.
__________________
"I feel like the bad decisions come into play when you trade too much of your time for money paying for things you can't really afford."
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to hayden55 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|