Are baby boomers conspiring with Toyota to destroy the world?

[cRiPpLe_rOoStEr]

I don't get why a so-called baby-boomer would have anything to do with Toyota supposedly trying to destroy the world, but anyway, some millenials may become annyoing when they embrace some agenda which was initially set by some baby-boomers...

[All Darc]

Each generation's weirdness are in general a response to the bullsh...t made by the generations that raised them.

Anyway I see with strange eyes when people like Luis Felipe Pondé, says the generation of today have no interest for sex. This generation is nearly a brothel and Ponde keep saying what he says.

I never saw a beautiful hot women complain about how society it's futile in give value to appearance and not to heart or brain. Maybe some do that only after became old and ugly. By now only ugly fat or ill women say that.
In the same way I neve see a generation blame their own generation, but the past and the new generations. I was the only person, as far as I know, to say the generation I belonged was a sh...

Milenials are just like all generations, a byproduct of the culture, influence and values they were subjected on childhood and teens. Most people are just that, a geographic accident, unable to really look top the world with own eyes and fair judgement. Unable to transcend the silly influences there were in and see beyond.

Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr

I don't get why a so-called baby-boomer would have anything to do with Toyota supposedly trying to destroy the world, but anyway, some millenials may become annyoing when they embrace some agenda which was initially set by some baby-boomers...

[freebeard]

I never saw a beautiful hot women complain about how society it's futile in give value to appearance and not to heart or brain.

It's hard to edit the negativity out of that but in this country the hot women wear red-white-and-blue bikinis and the not-so-hot ones wear pink hats.

[Xist]

Baby boomers have nothing to do with Toyota, but I chose that name because of my recent post about Toyota conspiring to kill the planet (and millenials blaming baby boomers for everything).

[freebeard]

Baby boomers have nothing to do with Toyota...

Okay, Millennial.

Baby Boomers rejected the chrome behemoths of the 1950s and put Toyota in the position it enjoys today.

Not everything the Baby Boomers did was wrong, witness Internet; just as the very little the Millennial generation is getting right.

[All Darc]

There was a boom of births after 2* word war...
We will have a boom of people with Alzheimer and Parkinson disease soon. Indeed it's already starting with the people who birth in the middle 40's. The boom that named the baby boomers was from 1946 to 1964. Well, 18 years...

Health insurance will get crazy...

And medical science it's still a piece of garbage in terms of deal with these diseases. Funny, 50 years since man reached the Moon, and medicine it's still a fu...ing piece of sh...t.

[redpoint5]

People aren't meant to have children in their 30s and 40s, or live to be 80. There are costs associated with socially manipulating different reproductive behavior than what nature had intended, such as fewer births, and more genetic related problems. Medicine has allowed us to live long enough to inevitably encounter problems associated with aging.

In my estimation, medical costs will continue to rise as a percent of GDP until genetic engineering is employed.

[All Darc]

Oh... people are intented to have children in their teens, or 20's, when they are stupid.
If people wasn't stupid they would not reproduce, would not bring people to this sh...twhole world and disgracefull society.

[redpoint5]

Of course, which is why I'm saying we're at a greater long-term threat due to under-population than overpopulation.

Overpopulation, if it really is a thing, is the tiniest blip in human history, and is already correcting itself. The growth rate has been in decline since 1962. My prediction is that the spread and advancement of technology will accelerate this trend so that we reach zero growth by the end of my lifetime.



Nature would have us reproducing at age 14 or something. We'd be dead by 30. As a late father, I understand why we're meant to be immature and naive when we have children; because there is no convenient time to do it, and understanding the implications of child rearing scares most people away.

I'm not suggesting we go back to "nature" only that our social and medicinal "advancement" brings with it its own problems.

[All Darc]

The technology will allow government to create people in bio incubators on lab, and will hire people to raise them.

Or robots will take care of old people. Personally I found it a better solution than the greed alternative of increase reproduction just to take care of a bunch of old people from a corrupt, imoral and ugly civilization.

Underpopulation have another risk, and it's the overpopulatrion of low IQ people among the new underpopulation itself, the new births. Society's human genes connected with lower IQ will rise, while genes connected with high IQ will fall. Today stupid people are the one who have mnre kids or early had kids.
Not just low IQ people, but also bad people, with poor morals, or with criminal record.