Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-05-2014, 01:37 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 121
Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
Back to simplicity: Would carbureted ethanol-only cars pass new car emission tests?

With cars becoming more complex

Would a new car designed to be run only on ethanol (E85 or E70 blends) equipped with a carburetor
Carburetor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Posted that in case younger members don't know what a carburetor is.

Suppose the car has a electronic jets in its carburetor, an oxygen sensor, secondary air injection (smog pump)
Secondary air injection - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and catalytic converters if necessary

Would that pass new car emission controls as ethanol is much more clean burning?
Are there laws allowing less stringent emission tests for Ethanol-only new cars?

New cars are said to consume more oil to build than the fuel they will burn in their lifetime.
So to be truly green a new car not only needs to burn little fuel, it also must be long-lasting, easy and cheap to repair.

If so, then it looks like the 70s oil crisis was "solved" wrong
Instead of warmongering the middle East to TRY to get cheap oil then the solution was to continue with landyachts but convert them to ethanol and reforest American deserts.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-05-2014, 02:26 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Ever worked on a carburetor? They are not simple.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2014, 02:55 PM   #3 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
It might not be impossible for a carburettor-fed car to get approved in an emissions test, but probably a turbocharger would help on that matter. I'm aware of some Volkswagen EA-827 engines which actually had cleaner emissions than stock ones. But if you wanna go with electronic jets and Oxygen sensor, just get a regular EFI.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2014, 11:20 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big time View Post
New cars are said to consume more oil to build than the fuel they will burn in their lifetime.
The price of a car is often reflective of the resources used to build it. That a gasoline powered car can use more than its worth in fuel over its lifetime, even considering that taxes and profit margins on fuel are much lower, as it is sold in bulk, speaks volumes about where more oil is used in a car's manufacture.

(Also note the high level of plastic, rubber and steel recycling in a modern car.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2014, 01:22 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,695
Thanks: 7,775
Thanked 8,584 Times in 7,068 Posts
Quote:
If so, then it looks like the 70s oil crisis was "solved" wrong
Instead of warmongering the middle East to TRY to get cheap oil then the solution was to continue with landyachts but convert them to ethanol and reforest American deserts.
It's not just that. Using your petro purchasing power to squabble with other folks is also WRONG.

'landyachts'? Let me introduce your to the 1949 Nash Airflyte.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2014, 03:27 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
101Volts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 506

Woody - '90 Mercury Grand Marquis Wagon LS
Last 3: 19.57 mpg (US)

Brick - '99 Chevrolet K2500 Suburban LS
Last 3: 12.94 mpg (US)

M. C. - '01 Chevrolet Impala Base
90 day: 17.09 mpg (US)

R. J. - '05 Ford Explorer 4wd
90 day: 16.66 mpg (US)
Thanks: 934
Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts
This brings up something; I drove Boxy (1984 Chevrolet Caprice Classic Sedan) today and I felt something about it that isn't really quite the same as the 2000 Caravan, Being carbureted and riding in a different way than the Caravan; I felt so relaxed driving it that I was feeling as if I was falling asleep, Then I turned on the air. What is it about older cars? I also felt like enjoying the ride and it reminds me of that Andy Griffith Show episode in which Andy and Barney are just riding in Barney's 1960 Ford Edsel (Which would get about 8 to 12 MPG stock) singing their high school football team theme song.

And the last tank of fuel was 18.5ish MPG, Which isn't above EPA HWY figures but it is higher than some brand new cars get today.
__________________



  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2014, 04:03 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big time View Post
If so, then it looks like the 70s oil crisis was "solved" wrong
Instead of warmongering the middle East to TRY to get cheap oil...
You do know that the '70s oil embargo really wasn't about oil at all: oil was just a weapon used in a dispute that was (and still is) fundamentally about religious and ethnic differences. (That much is history: further comment would descend into politics, so I'll refrain.)

To the original point, EFI systems are much simpler than carburetors, especially the ones used on automobiles from the mid-50s on. If you've ever taken one apart, you'll have seen that they're a maze of passages filled with jets, valves, springs and such, which all have to be sized right - and clean - to function properly. Then you have to painstakingly adjust things by hand to get mixture & idle speed correct, except that 'correct' only holds for a particular elevation & temperature range. And don't even get me started on trying to balance multiple carbs...

EFI is brilliantly simple by contrast: a simple pump squirts a measured amount of fuel into the cylinder, while a sensor measures the exhaust and uses a feedback loop to correct the amount.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2014, 04:19 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 29.5 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 50.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
To answer the OP's question, maybe. It sounds like you're describing the old electronic feedback carburetors, which were the last thing before TBI (and frankly not too different in my opinion). It would depend on how stringent the emissions regulations are where you're talking about trying it. Where I live, there aren't any emissions regulations so sure, go for it.

I strongly disagree with anyone saying EFI is simpler than carburetors. Nothing could be further from the facts. EFI - Electronic Fuel Injection - requires fast computers, multiple sensor inputs and fast injector solenoids.

Carburetors rely on physics. Unless you're S.M. Stirling, you're in the clear forever. A high-altitude nuclear strike will cook your EFI while nothing short of a direct lightning bolt (or a solid whack with a big hammer) will disrupt the function of your carburetor. Yes, they fall away from the ideal depending on conditions. For the most part however, as long as YOU can breathe, the car can too. Sure, it takes some sophisticated engineering to make a good carburetor, but I'd like to point out that that was done decades ago by people whose main computing power was slide rules and an experienced eye.

I'm one of those people who really likes having a full-size spare in the vehicle. Carburetors are near and dear to me for their reliable underpinnings. If my carb stops working, I can probably figure it out and fix it with my hands, with tools that grip and turn. If my EFI quits working, my first resource is ordering a new computer. How is THAT taking ownership of one's equipment?

Also: if you're running E85, you can brew your own fuel! That's seriously taking ownership right there.
__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.

Last edited by elhigh; 04-06-2014 at 07:08 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2014, 05:19 PM   #9 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by elhigh View Post
Carburetors are near and dear to me for their reliable underpinnings. If my carb stops working, I can probably figure it out and fix it with my hands, with tools that grip and turn. If my EFI quits working, my first resource is ordering a new computer. How is THAT taking ownership of one's equipment?
That's why I still trust carburettors for some applications in harsher environments more than an EFI.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2014, 07:53 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
101Volts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 506

Woody - '90 Mercury Grand Marquis Wagon LS
Last 3: 19.57 mpg (US)

Brick - '99 Chevrolet K2500 Suburban LS
Last 3: 12.94 mpg (US)

M. C. - '01 Chevrolet Impala Base
90 day: 17.09 mpg (US)

R. J. - '05 Ford Explorer 4wd
90 day: 16.66 mpg (US)
Thanks: 934
Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts
So would some of these fuel injection cars work as well as this 1966 Ford after 30+ years in a field, For example?


__________________




Last edited by 101Volts; 04-06-2014 at 08:00 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com