Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-28-2012, 05:31 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 830
Thanks: 44
Thanked 104 Times in 80 Posts
Battling the non-believers

I had a fun afternoon of going back and forth with a handful of guys on a ford ranger board about hypermiling in general and EOCing in particular.

It seems that people in general out there think that engine off coasting a manual transmissioned car is crazy and dangerous. I turned it around on them and said that someone with a 6" lift and mudder tires should probably just STFU when it comes to preaching safety.

Then the pile on of the bigfooters commenced!!!!

Good times.

It is amazing how basic physics seems to be beyond the comprehension of most folks.

Anyone else here been through this when explaining to "normal" people that you are actually looney enough to shut your engine off at 40 mph?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-28-2012, 05:40 PM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I got banned from the chevelles forum for talking about fuel economy. Imagine that.

I wonder how they are enjoying the $4 gas? They sure love to biatch about it, then in the next breath brag about their big block.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 05:47 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 80

Doug - '03 Chrysler PT Cruiser Base
90 day: 31.16 mpg (US)

DR 350 - '92 Suzuki DR 350 S
90 day: 61.09 mpg (US)

Sid the Sloth - '82 Honda Civic CVCC Wagon
Last 3: 35.93 mpg (US)

Rocky - '92 Daihatsu Rocky
Last 3: 24.97 mpg (US)

Mick - '97 Jeep Cherokee XJ UpCountry
90 day: 19.4 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
I bet a lifted ranger can handle emergency maneuvers and emergency braking better than EOC vacuum-less driving. Doesn't seem like an apples to apples comparison...
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 05:48 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
the people who bash hypermiling then complain about mileage, in my opinion, are simply too incompetent to make the connection. or too scared to build what they really want. why not put a big block v8 in a prius (aside from the obvious engineering difficulty)?


hypermiling is fun, but sometimes i just get that need for speed!! i prefer to have my cake and eat it too, which is why my next car will be a v-8 manual. looking seriously at the '04 GTO 6 spd.
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 05:58 PM   #5 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,570 Times in 2,834 Posts
Big block chevys were nice when gas was near $1/gal.

The majority of people believe that their vehicle left the factory in the best configuration for their individual driving habit, driving conditions and is already setup to get the best economy possible.
Some believe it takes a team of engineers to improve fuel economy.
Maybe that is true when trying to come up with a cheap, idiot proof way to increase fuel economy that is federal and california emmissions legal.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
svt98t (09-30-2012)
Old 09-28-2012, 06:00 PM   #6 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neen View Post
I bet a lifted ranger can handle emergency maneuvers and emergency braking better than EOC vacuum-less driving. Doesn't seem like an apples to apples comparison...
I bet not! And it was a good comparison- hit those dolts right in the nads.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 06:12 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 80

Doug - '03 Chrysler PT Cruiser Base
90 day: 31.16 mpg (US)

DR 350 - '92 Suzuki DR 350 S
90 day: 61.09 mpg (US)

Sid the Sloth - '82 Honda Civic CVCC Wagon
Last 3: 35.93 mpg (US)

Rocky - '92 Daihatsu Rocky
Last 3: 24.97 mpg (US)

Mick - '97 Jeep Cherokee XJ UpCountry
90 day: 19.4 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Well it would be pretty easy to test wouldn't it? take two rangers, one with a 6" lift and mud terrains and one that is EOCing and see what the braking distance is for each...then so a similar test in quick lane changes.

I'm willing to eat my words if they are both within a few percentages of each other. I doubt they are though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 06:18 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
5speed5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Los Alamos, NM
Posts: 134

TBSS - '08 Chevrolet Trailblazer SS 2WD
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)

Wife's car - '09 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 22.96 mpg (US)

Big Blue Hippo - '06 Chevrolet HHR 2LT
90 day: 45.99 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 20 Times in 11 Posts
My wife hates it when I do EOC and/or hypermiling in general (and, probably mostly, the fact that it makes me so touchy about the car and when, where, and how it can be driven).

I stopped doing EOC altogether and when she's in the car, I just drive the car like a normal person now (which is why I've stopped keeping track of my mpg...it's no fun unless I can go balls-to-the-wall all the time, trying to beat my last number, etc... Before anyone rags on my wife, it's actually a good thing, hypermiling was feeding my OCD which is not a good thing and I'm actually a happier person).

Thanks to normal efficient driving techniques and some light P&G (engine on), I'm still getting 38+ mpg in combined driving (which is still 72+% over EPA-combined and 35+% over EPA-highway for a 2006 2.4L 5-spd HHR).
__________________
Daily driver:
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 07:19 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neen View Post
Well it would be pretty easy to test wouldn't it? take two rangers, one with a 6" lift and mud terrains and one that is EOCing and see what the braking distance is for each...then so a similar test in quick lane changes.

I'm willing to eat my words if they are both within a few percentages of each other. I doubt they are though.
Do you know what oversize wheels and tires do to the handling of a vehicle? all the person who is EOC'ing has to do is let out the clutch and bam, the engine is running. 6" lift and mud tires, quick lane change... am i the only one who foresees an unpleasant ending?
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 07:51 PM   #10 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neen View Post
I bet a lifted ranger can handle emergency maneuvers and emergency braking better than EOC vacuum-less driving. Doesn't seem like an apples to apples comparison...
I don't know about you, but I rarely run out of vacuum when I EOC. There is enough vacuum built up in the reservoir to use the brakes 2-3 times before it runs out of assist. So, only on long, windy hills. Otherwise, I still have good brakes.

I don't think I'd classify either as unsafe though.

__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com