04-12-2015, 09:32 AM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 148
Thanks: 5
Thanked 50 Times in 43 Posts
|
Mount the Kamback to the rear doors and leave its rear end open. When the doors swing open, the KB swings too.
Ford offered smaller mirrors but they're rare. That's because a vehicle this big NEEDS good mirrors or a camera setup. These mirrors will stay for now. I don't want holes in the doors and I like clean, subtle mods. I realize the KB will not be subtle but I'm playing with a couple designs to keep it as cleanly integrated as possible.
I'm WAY into the big van. It's SUPER convenient and only becoming more so as I add to it. A full camper interior is in the works with a propane stove and furnace, sink, 2 beds, a DC fridge, solar power...The plan is to hit the PanAm highway and see central and south America a year or so after I graduate
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mwilliamshs For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
04-12-2015, 09:53 AM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Pekin, IL
Posts: 149
Crown Vic - '99 Ford Crown Victoria Base (P74) 90 day: 24.1 mpg (US) Turtle - '98 Subaru Outback Sport 90 day: 30.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 21
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
|
Nice.
Are you on Expedition Portal?
__________________
'99 Crown Victoria
'97 Impreza 2.2, 5-speed
'98 Impreza Outback Sport 2.2, 5-speed
'05 Outback 3.0R (wife's)
|
|
|
04-12-2015, 09:55 AM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 148
Thanks: 5
Thanked 50 Times in 43 Posts
|
Yeah I am on expedition portal
|
|
|
04-12-2015, 12:22 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwilliamshs
Ford offered smaller mirrors but they're rare. That's because a vehicle this big NEEDS good mirrors or a camera setup.
|
I'd think about remaking the supports from aluminium reshaped into an aero foil, and new mirrors from something more modern, possibly a Jeep Wrangler or later Vanagon come to mind, both are reasonably big but have a fairly rounded front end.
|
|
|
04-12-2015, 02:43 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,881 Times in 7,329 Posts
|
Quote:
Mount the Kamback to the rear doors and leave its rear end open. When the doors swing open, the KB swings too.
|
I'd thought about suggesting that, but the hinge line in that picture you posted looks to be 4-6" in from the corner. Wouldn't it need overlapping plates or some other solution? My thought was to make a clamshell that replaced the doors with shelving inside each half, but then you'd have to seal an edge that's twice as long as the doors, so there wouldn't be a lot of dust and exhaust infiltrating.
How about a hinge-line from the bumper ends to a bracket on the drip-rail?
There's whole threads on rear-view mirrors. I like these:
|
|
|
04-12-2015, 04:31 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 568
Thanks: 1
Thanked 73 Times in 58 Posts
|
I have a '92 E-150 conversion van, same basic model shown above, but with a high top cap. http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=...=0CIEBEDMoXTBd
Its mirrors could be smaller, and the Corplast undertray idea is very promising since the stock belly of this van is an aerodynamic abortion. Or at least add a garden edging air dam. Pizza pan wheel covers would be s snap to install, nestled inside the aluminum wheel rim lips.
My brother has a Ford F-150 with the same 5.8 liter engine, so it's mechanically the same. He says he gets MUCH better highway fuel economy by changing the ignition timing, i.e., ~18-19 mpg vs. ~13-14 mpg previously, so look into that simple mod.
The E-150 van may have better (less bad) aerodynamics than the F-150 pickup truck.
|
|
|
04-12-2015, 05:40 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
Cyborg ECU
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwilliamshs
...The picture aerohead posted, is that just my wake as-is, or is that the shape a tail should have, etc? ...
|
It is the shape a tail would take, not the shape of your wake.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.
Last edited by California98Civic; 04-12-2015 at 05:45 PM..
Reason: added images
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to California98Civic For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-13-2015, 03:43 AM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Pekin, IL
Posts: 149
Crown Vic - '99 Ford Crown Victoria Base (P74) 90 day: 24.1 mpg (US) Turtle - '98 Subaru Outback Sport 90 day: 30.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 21
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
|
Found you on Expedition Portal. I didn't realize your van had the good ol' 300 six. That's probably one of my top 5 all time favorite engines.
Several years ago I happened to buy a '94 F150 with a 4.9, 5-speed combo with 200,000+ miles and it was buttery smooth. It ran better and more smoothly than the wife's 4 year old mini van.
I drove it like an 18 wheeler; never above 2,500 rpm at MOST and usually around 1,200-1,500. I miss that truck. I'll definitely be keeping an eye on your thread here and on E.P.
__________________
'99 Crown Victoria
'97 Impreza 2.2, 5-speed
'98 Impreza Outback Sport 2.2, 5-speed
'05 Outback 3.0R (wife's)
|
|
|
04-13-2015, 05:25 AM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Pekin, IL
Posts: 149
Crown Vic - '99 Ford Crown Victoria Base (P74) 90 day: 24.1 mpg (US) Turtle - '98 Subaru Outback Sport 90 day: 30.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 21
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwilliamshs
Yeah I am on expedition portal
|
What about Grassroots Motorsports? The guys over there would LOVE this van and with your low buck repairs and upgrades you'd fit right in.
__________________
'99 Crown Victoria
'97 Impreza 2.2, 5-speed
'98 Impreza Outback Sport 2.2, 5-speed
'05 Outback 3.0R (wife's)
|
|
|
04-13-2015, 01:23 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
Master Novice
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
|
I like the 300 and wouldn't change it even if I could, were it me making the decisions. I'm a sucker for old school tech, and a stout truck six like that is right in my wheelhouse. It isn't sophisticated and it isn't especially powerful, but it is dogged and relentless, and that appeals.
The big clunky hinges are an advantage in one way: they provide ready-made mounting points for your tail if you decide to add one. If you can get the hinge pins out, you could replace them with slightly longer ones and install tail panels on those hinges, making it so that you could fold the tail flush against the rear of the vehicle for in-city use or garaging. You could even feasibly still open the doors partway without disturbing the deployed tail.
The underside of your van is an aerodynamic mess and you will reap benefits either from an airdam as you've already discussed, or from adding a belly pan and skirts. It might also make the vehicle quieter, but I'm only guessing there.
I remember working under a 15-pass I used to drive for work, once I was under the vehicle it opened up and there was quite a bit of space in places, next to none in others. Very craggy and uneven.
__________________
Lead or follow. Either is fine.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to elhigh For This Useful Post:
|
|
|