06-11-2013, 05:23 AM
|
#51 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Quote:
I believe that to even want to participate in these kind of races, you have to be eco minded and bona fide.
But if anyone wanted to play tricks, there is a lot that is possible. If the front wheels trail the steering point any sideways shake provides forward thrust, and it would be very hard to notice.
|
You have to be a student member of SAE for the U.S. SAE competitions.
It would be easy to notice a contestant steering like a spaz instead of smoothly.
I don't know if there's any incentive to cheat except to get bragging rights. However I have wondered if anyone has tried to do something along the lines of the 1973 Shell Economy Run's infamous Opel "Vapor" engine.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
06-11-2013, 11:29 AM
|
#52 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,241
Thanks: 7,255
Thanked 2,234 Times in 1,724 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedDevil
I believe that to even want to participate in these kind of races, you have to be eco minded and bona fide.
But if anyone wanted to play tricks, there is a lot that is possible. If the front wheels trail the steering point any sideways shake provides forward thrust, and it would be very hard to notice.
Apparently you can get 10.000 mpg from a 130 kg car/driver combination doing 15 mph.
Lets extrapolate that to 1300 kg and 75 mph, assuming 10 times as much air restistance times 25 for 5 times the speed.
10.000 divided by 250 is just 40 mpg... and 40 mpg at 75 mph, that is something my Insight can do easily. Ah ha...!
10.000 mpg? They're not even trying
|
Well, if it were ten times as heavy, then wouldn't the volume be ten times as well? Assuming they keep their aerodynamic proportions, 10^(2/3)=4.64.
I get 86 MPG.
|
|
|
06-11-2013, 04:28 PM
|
#53 (permalink)
|
Master EcoWalker
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 4,000
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,247 Times in 1,455 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist
Well, if it were ten times as heavy, then wouldn't the volume be ten times as well? Assuming they keep their aerodynamic proportions, 10^(2/3)=4.64.
I get 86 MPG.
|
Lengthwise there's not much difference. Total front surface; probably more than 10 times. So I stand by my calculation, tongue in cheek but nonetheless.
(The volume is actually way more than 10 times bigger)
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gigameter or 0.13 Megamile.
For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
Last edited by RedDevil; 06-18-2013 at 03:59 PM..
|
|
|
06-18-2013, 02:00 PM
|
#54 (permalink)
|
Master Novice
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee
I'm gonna start using Frankunits. It got 379 mpg in Frank gallons. We butcher our language so badly these days; might as well butcher the numbers and units too.
|
Let the gibbing begin!
Elhigh Π = 4. Four, do you hear me? FOUR.
__________________
Lead or follow. Either is fine.
|
|
|
06-19-2013, 03:25 AM
|
#55 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 304
Thanks: 27
Thanked 71 Times in 46 Posts
|
I'm just realizing that no one has yet mentioned solar challenge cars in relation to this thread. In very similar vehicles, they average speeds approaching 60mph without using a drop of fossil fuel. not even from the power grid. to me there is no contest, the solar cars win.
|
|
|
06-19-2013, 03:33 AM
|
#56 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Different strokes. Wind cars can go even faster plus there aren't any complex energy systems.
|
|
|
06-19-2013, 10:17 AM
|
#57 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: WI
Posts: 473
Thanks: 157
Thanked 77 Times in 55 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bschloop
I'm just realizing that no one has yet mentioned solar challenge cars in relation to this thread. In very similar vehicles, they average speeds approaching 60mph without using a drop of fossil fuel. not even from the power grid. to me there is no contest, the solar cars win.
|
Definitely a great idea, but you do need sun, and a way to store extra energy.
That means you are dependent on weather conditions and time of day, which makes it a bit less practical.
This is the current state of the art of compact solar power systems as far as I know - http://www.solarimpulse.com/
Last edited by jkv357; 06-19-2013 at 02:18 PM..
|
|
|
06-19-2013, 12:47 PM
|
#58 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,241
Thanks: 7,255
Thanked 2,234 Times in 1,724 Posts
|
My mother keeps telling me that we do not have more solar panels here in Arizona because it gets too hot, although hopefully it does not get cold enough to severely impair battery life.
|
|
|
06-20-2013, 10:27 AM
|
#59 (permalink)
|
Master Novice
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
|
Too hot = no problem
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist
My mother keeps telling me that we do not have more solar panels here in Arizona because it gets too hot, although hopefully it does not get cold enough to severely impair battery life.
|
CSP systems thrive in heat. This is, I think, the primary generation paradigm used by those giant solar installations in Spain. Except for the mirrors and collectors, the generation end is completely familiar territory. Take a regular thermal generation engineer out of his coal-burning power plant and drop him into the hot end of a solar thermal power plant, he will recognize everything.
__________________
Lead or follow. Either is fine.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to elhigh For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-25-2013, 04:51 AM
|
#60 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 304
Thanks: 27
Thanked 71 Times in 46 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist
My mother keeps telling me that we do not have more solar panels here in Arizona because it gets too hot, although hopefully it does not get cold enough to severely impair battery life.
|
A solar powered vehicle would have a built in cooling mechanism for the cells, the air you are moving through. even a black car cools down considerably when you start moving.
|
|
|
|