Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-09-2016, 09:46 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 40.02 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 49.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
The Duke used the same bellhousing pattern as the 60-degree V6. Bolts right up.

If you're serious about this I don't recommend the Duke. I love them irrationally, they aren't powerful or sophisticated (and sophistication is overrated) but they are dogged and relentless. They're like the SBC of largish fours, right up there with the Toyota 22R in terms of longevity.

But along the same lines is the Mercury Marine 3.0. Back in the day Pontiac also produced the Super Duty Four, a racing-bred 4-banger that could be bored out to over 200 cubic inches and reliably crank out 300 horsepower. It was Duke architecture but with heavier internals to handle the stresses. The Mercury block is supplied by GM and is a halfway step between the Duke and the SD4. It'll pump out over 130 hp - much better than any Duke - all day long. If you were of a mind to upgrade to a higher output, there's room there without endangering the engine's lifespan. Boat motors are built rugged.

For the chassis I'd screw the Merc into a Celebrity wagon. I always thought those had the best proportions of any GM wagon, ever. 135 is approximately equal to the "high performance"* Eurosport VR models, and a 5-speed manual was available behind the V6 option, so there are 60-degree compatible manuals to be had. It's within the realm of possibility.

You'd have better luck installing a newer four-pot, however. Tuning and efficiency are such that you'd probably get more power and more mileage, and still may have a shot at bolting on the 5-speed. For my part I really like the idea of the old-school boat motor and a period Getrag tranny in a Celebrity, but that's me. You do you.

* When talking about Chevy Celebrities, "high performance" has to be in quotes.

__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.

Last edited by elhigh; 02-09-2016 at 09:56 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-09-2016, 01:11 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,013

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 41.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 466 Times in 287 Posts
How about the 2.8/2.9 four cylinder used in 2004-2012 Chevrolet Colorados combined with the wide ratio six speed from the 2016 Colorado? That engine is not gutless, it's more powerful than the engine from the 1975 Corvette. I think that a Caprice wagon has better aero than my truck, so that engine/transmission combination should be capable of getting better mileage than I'm getting in my truck.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 01:26 PM   #13 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,874

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 495
Thanked 863 Times in 650 Posts
Stock crate 6.2 diesels can be had for $50+ from the gov liquidation auctions often, they are similar to a 454 in size and if you get a C code motor with a 5speed you will find they get good MPG in large boats.

So a diesel in my mind is more work but not necessarily more cost.

Good Luck
Ryan
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 01:40 PM   #14 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
( ↑ ) "...driven properly - not WOT all the time..." implies:

• NEVER attempting to merge onto a crowded freeway
• NEVER passing a slower vehicle in front of you
• NEVER attempting to climb any hills...or...mountains
• ALWAYS driving at a constant speed
• ALWAYS driving on flat land ONLY
• ALWAYS driving in right-hand lane ONLY
• NEVER accelerating...
• ONLY coasting
No it doesn't.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
freebeard (02-09-2016)
Old 02-09-2016, 02:39 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
redneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,795

Geo XL1 - '94 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Boat tails and more mods
90 day: 72.22 mpg (US)

Big, Bad & Flat - '01 Dodge Ram 3500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 21.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 226
Thanked 1,353 Times in 711 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankiec55 View Post
Dear List,

How would you do it? T5 transmission in a B-Body Wagon. I am trying to decide on engine and rear end gearing for highway cruising with maybe very light duty towing.
Cummins 4BT, T5 transmission and a 2.73 rear end.

All the torque needed for towing and low rpm highway cruising.



>
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2016, 05:35 AM   #16 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,548
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,622 Times in 1,447 Posts
Instead of the 4BT, maybe the B3.3 could also be an option as it's lighter.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2016, 08:42 AM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
redneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,795

Geo XL1 - '94 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Boat tails and more mods
90 day: 72.22 mpg (US)

Big, Bad & Flat - '01 Dodge Ram 3500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 21.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 226
Thanked 1,353 Times in 711 Posts
.

There are a lot of options.



  Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2016, 03:15 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 410
Thanks: 966
Thanked 74 Times in 63 Posts
Many years ago, I had a 77 Chevy Caprice with a 350 and a Turbo 350 trans with no lockup. It got 15 mpg on a good day. It was NOT a lightweight. We put 360k miles on that car. Two engines and maybe 3 or 4 tranny rebuilds. We (wife, two sons and me) went all over the USA towing a StarCraft pop-up camper, or a StarCraft boat carrying a tent, in that car. Many good memories.

Also had a 1978 Malibu 4 dr. 305 and a Turbo 200. Put 200k on that car. That car was the quietest and smoothest car I have ever had.

To get to my point, the Caprice wagon was pretty heavy. What about a Chevy II wagon or is that too lightweight?
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2016, 01:58 AM   #19 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,548
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,622 Times in 1,447 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redneck View Post
.

There are a lot of options.



When GM and Ford started offering Diesels in their Brazilian trucks, basically they resorted to locally-available 4-cylinder agricultural engines. Not so fancy as the V8 ones from their American counterparts, but could get the job done cheaper than their inline-6 gassers. The same approach was done in engine swaps into military vehicles in the 70's. If you can bypass the EPA rules, go for it and you won't regret.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2016, 02:20 AM   #20 (permalink)
Volvo-driving MachYeen
 
Fingie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Finland
Posts: 788

Neo Volvo - '98 Volvo S70 10V
90 day: 24.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 298
Thanked 82 Times in 68 Posts
Well agricultural engines make more sense than the GM-built diesels based on gasoline engines.

Also, Hi Rooster

__________________
If you don't make any mistakes in your life,
life itself will be a f*ckup.



With Volvo to Valhalla and back!
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com