Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-03-2009, 02:10 AM   #181 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hermie View Post
Anyone who has locked their brakes on the highway is included in that poll. Higher lift means increased braking distances due to decreased traction.

But if you want to keep your head buried in the sand, be my guest. Like I said, I'll just point and laugh when you wreck because you didn't have the grip to get out of the way.
Are you aware that aerodynamic profile changes drastically during heavy braking? You get more frontal area and a much higher Cd due to angle of approach changing. You create a large section of increased wake, which helps to slow you down, even at minute amounts.

Also, as speed decreases, so does lift. If you want to decrease lift, why not just slow down?

__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"


Last edited by Christ; 12-03-2009 at 03:17 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-03-2009, 08:03 AM   #182 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
Alright fellas, calm down. We all know EM is about facts. Post up your data and prove your points. No more name calling.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Daox For This Useful Post:
Cd (12-04-2009), Funny (12-03-2009), landsailor (05-29-2011), thatguitarguy (12-03-2009)
Old 12-03-2009, 03:18 PM   #183 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Edited post... Sorry, that was inappropriate.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2009, 06:12 PM   #184 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,123

The Geo - '93 Geo Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 45.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 30
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
Show me one car that has lifted off of the ground going 80 mph.

Didn't I prove this to you like 3 months ago?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 05:25 PM   #185 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Hermie, I'm not sure why you have such a fear of front end lift on your car.
Have you been involved in an accident in which the car became airborne ?

( I have - I hit a culvert going too fast, and did a 'Dukes of Hazzard' .)

If you want to design your car to have a well balanced Cl, as well as Cd, look to cars such as the McLaren and Ferrari.
Note the absence of wings on two of the cars in the image.

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2009, 07:54 PM   #186 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
orange4boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The Wet Coast, Kanuckistan.
Posts: 1,275

The Golden Egg - '93 Toyota Previa DX
90 day: 31.91 mpg (US)

Chewie - '03 Toyota Prius
90 day: 57 mpg (US)

The Spaceship - '00 Honda Insight
Thanks: 100
Thanked 306 Times in 178 Posts
There is a cure for the lift that occurred in that flip video which, by the way, was from the car going sideways. Roof mounted longitudinal ribs which kill the lift if the car goes sideways like that.

Better keep your roof rack if you intend to go sideways at 200 mph. On salt...
__________________
Vortex generators are old tech. My new and improved vortex alternators are unstoppable.

"It’s easy to explain how rockets work but explaining the aerodynamics of a wing takes a rocket scientist.


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2009, 11:10 AM   #187 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Pug nosed versus sloped nosed cars

By now, I'm sure we all have seen our share of cars that are designed with a what looks like a crushed in 'pug' nose.
Examples of this design would be on new cars such as the Prius, the Yaris, the Corolla, as well as others from other makes, such as the Civic.
( I think I just made some enemies with that comment )
At first, It made sense that the reason that the nose is bulbous versus tapered down is that it helps the vehicles in a front impact. Since the hoodline in higher, it has more of a chance meeting up with the front bumper of SUVs.

But then I got to thinking about cars like the Corvette. If car designers have to make cars with front ends that are more blunt, how do sports cars get away with having a sleek design that lacks the upright front end ?

It certainly can be done and result in a safe and lightweight car - just look at the Honda Fit, which has quite a nice looking snozz.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2009, 12:52 PM   #188 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Leadville, CO
Posts: 509

Maroon Ballon - '98 Chrysler Town & Country LXI
90 day: 26.42 mpg (US)

MaEsTRO - '95 Geo Metro 5spd hatch, 3 cyl
Thanks: 47
Thanked 54 Times in 38 Posts
Corvettes are not designed to crash into SUVs. Neither are McClarens or Ferraris. They are also in different classes than all the other cars you mentioned. By law, if they are in the USA, they have to pass certain front and side impact standards. Impact from what, is not as defined.

Safety in vehicles is good. Safety in drivers is much more important. Personally, I'd like to see fewer vehicles on the road that are built like tanks. The problem is less the vehicle than the driver, because too many people drive these vehicles like they are driving tanks.

To paraphrase another saying, "Cars don't kill people - people, driving cars, kill people."
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2009, 03:42 PM   #189 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by thatguitarguy View Post
Corvettes are not designed to crash into SUVs. Neither are McClarens or Ferraris. They are also in different classes than all the other cars you mentioned. By law, if they are in the USA, they have to pass certain front and side impact standards. Impact from what, is not as defined.
What about the Honda Fit ?
It has a sloped nose versus a bulbous design, yet I wold think that it is tested the same way that the Yaris is.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2009, 04:45 PM   #190 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Leadville, CO
Posts: 509

Maroon Ballon - '98 Chrysler Town & Country LXI
90 day: 26.42 mpg (US)

MaEsTRO - '95 Geo Metro 5spd hatch, 3 cyl
Thanks: 47
Thanked 54 Times in 38 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd View Post
What about the Honda Fit ?
I don't understand your question. Fit, Ferrari, or F'n Hummer, they all have to pass the same impact standards. But crashing any car into a wall, and crashing the same car into a post, or an identical car, or an SUV, will yield different results.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mods-data-% change or Cd change ( installment#4-Rooflines( quotes)) ) aerohead Aerodynamics 0 05-24-2008 03:49 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com