Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-23-2009, 11:17 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Central Alabama
Posts: 572

Big Salsa - '04 Toyota Sienna LE

Silver - '10 Toyota Prius III
Thanks: 110
Thanked 123 Times in 71 Posts
Minimum ride height?

What is a good minimum ride height to shoot for on a vehicle? I have seen 15deg as the minimum infront of the front tires and behind the rear tires, but I don't think I have heard mention of a "minimum ride height". Certainly you want some for clearing debris and such on the road, for taking corners (spring compression), or for speed bumps (the ones I cross every day are about 3 inches tall). I am looking at this from a side skirts/catamarans point of view. Thanks.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-23-2009, 11:32 AM   #2 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
I think the answer is "it depends".

SAE may have a rule of thumb answer. (By the way, I thought aerohead has said 10 degrees for approach/departure angle?)

But sports car owners tolerate below average ride heights. They just have to watch out more for debris, bumps & driveway angles.

Makes me wonder what the lowest, non-adjustable OEM clearance is...

basjoos would probably tell you to make the low-hanging bits sacrificial. His pontoons are coroplast. Inexpensive and not a lot of work required to replace.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2009, 12:08 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,861
Thanks: 23,922
Thanked 7,207 Times in 4,640 Posts
SAE and Custom by Crunch

SAE recommends an approach angle ahead of the front wheels of 16-degrees.Between the wheels,up to the rocker panel bottom,10-degrees,and behind the rear tires,10-degrees.
GM has adopted a partial solution with cars like Camaro,Firebird,Corvette,allowing the road to eat away the parts which extend too low.The New Beetle also utilizes this technology.
The Ford Probe-IV had active suspension which allowed the nose to drop,and front spoiler to deploy to a ground clearance of only 3.5-inches ( 87.5 mm ) above 40-mph.
Many supercars utilize active suspension to lower the car at speed,then raise it for urban warfare.
Here in Texas,engineers must design for roadkill,where the occasional dog,cat,skunk,possum,raccoon,armadillo,hog,white-tail deer,or tire-gator might take out a car's undercarriage.
Always travel with spices and condiments in Texas,as you never know when you might be preparing a roadside delight!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
dcb (12-23-2009)
Old 12-23-2009, 12:51 PM   #4 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
aerohead -- what did that SAE paper for the NASCAR Dodge Daytona 500 show as best nose-down rake for racing?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2009, 01:12 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,861
Thanks: 23,922
Thanked 7,207 Times in 4,640 Posts
Sae

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
aerohead -- what did that SAE paper for the NASCAR Dodge Daytona 500 show as best nose-down rake for racing?
Rat's,after all the trouble we went to,to get me access to it,I left the thing at home and it will be maybe 2-1/2 weeks before I can post on that.
My memory should not be trusted,but I do recall from the paper that the Dodge was very sensitive to rake angle,and a change of even a degree made a great difference to downforce and drag.
I'll bring that with me when I get back,sorry for today's empty hands.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2009, 03:01 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903

honda cb125 - '74 Honda CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuter Vehicles Inc. Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Honda Civic VX
Thanks: 867
Thanked 433 Times in 353 Posts
If you want to add side skirting, or a front lip why not make it out of stiff rubber like mud flaps are made out of? you can get it at farm farm stores.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2009, 03:34 PM   #7 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
My memory should not be trusted, but I do recall from the paper that the Dodge was very sensitive to rake angle, and a change of even a degree made a great difference to downforce and drag.
...that's what I recall too. Sorta like Goldy-locks and a "...not too much; and not too little" situation..." where either side of "...just right..." isn't gonna help you.

...just wanted to make the point that "sometimes" the "good spot" (vehicle rake angle) isn't something you want to arbitrarily be playing with, unless you know what you're getting yourself in for.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2009, 10:28 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 553

Little Blue - '98 Ford Escort ZX2 Cool
Team ZX2
90 day: 44.75 mpg (US)

Big Red - '00 Ford Excursion XLT
90 day: 15.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 45 Times in 29 Posts
I can't comment on the minimum ride height, but I have the 5" lawn edging from Home Depot for a front air dam on my car. It is about 3-4" off the pavement. It rubs all the time. Speed bumps, driveways, etc... I really like it because it is very durable. The snow and ice recently hasn't even cracked it in 20 degree weather. The asphalt has been the most abrasive on it by wearing it away. At $13 a roll, it gives you enough for two front air dams, so it's a great deal. I'd also use it for side skirts...
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2009, 10:39 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
so after smoothing the under belly all the way back, would a 3'' dam negate that work?
the bottom of my front lip is 7 3/4 inches to the ground. I could ratchet my springs down maybe one inch. But I had lowering springs for about 1 yr and I was ALWAYS scrapping my front lip.
What angle are you measuring?


Last edited by mcrews; 12-26-2009 at 10:54 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2009, 09:04 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JasonG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charlotte NC / York SC
Posts: 728

05 DMax - '05 Chevrolet 2500HD
90 day: 18.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 120
Thanked 56 Times in 52 Posts
I've worked on a few lowered cars that scrapped bumps and damaged their bumper covers.
It seems 4" will scrape regularly and 3" will scrape daily.
That said, if its lawn edging, etc., it will just flex out of the way and spring back.
One older large car (Buick?) if you let some air out of the bags then let off the gas hard and swerved over the line , the steel bumper would pop off the road reflectors ! Thats too low!

__________________



I can't understand why my MPG's are so low..........
21,000lb, 41' Toy Haulers are rough on FE!
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CdA list Daox Aerodynamics 206 10-25-2023 06:32 PM
First ride on a (semi-)recumbent bicycle: BikeE - got a CCM Evox 120 MetroMPG Alternative Transportation 20 11-14-2011 08:29 AM
Lower your 92-95 Civic and still ride comfortably! TomO Off-Topic Tech 1 11-05-2009 11:36 AM
Joy Ride or Killjoy? SuperTrooper General Efficiency Discussion 19 08-03-2009 10:49 AM
Bike ride story. Assualt? mhmitszach Alternative Transportation 16 08-20-2008 06:49 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com