Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-12-2016, 10:55 AM   #11 (permalink)
Volvo-driving MachYeen
 
Fingie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Finland
Posts: 788

Neo Volvo - '98 Volvo S70 10V
90 day: 24.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 298
Thanked 82 Times in 68 Posts
Whaat?

My Vaz was launched in 1995 and it has a promised CD of 0.30.


__________________
If you don't make any mistakes in your life,
life itself will be a f*ckup.



With Volvo to Valhalla and back!
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-12-2016, 11:46 AM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,188
Thanks: 132
Thanked 2,811 Times in 1,973 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fingie View Post
Whaat?

My Vaz was launched in 1995 and it has a promised CD of 0.30. :cool
Is that a Russian design, or did VW help?

I found the Ecomodder Cd list.

Vehicle Coefficient of Drag List - EcoModder

Many more vehicles above 0.30 than below 0.30, but you can almost segregated them by age of design.

If that Vaz really is 0.30, it was a stellar example of aerodynamics back in 1995, and quite exceptional.

Handsome too.

EDIT-1

Looking at the Ecomodder Cd list, I could draw an conclusion that European models (in general) were about 15 years ahead of US models (in general) in terms of Cd.

And you could categorize most Japanese models excluding the Prius/Insight hybrid lines as lagging behind Europe too, but at a decade at best.

What I'm saying is that a 2000 Audi and a common 2016 US car have about the same Cd.

And that a common 2006 Japanese model and a common 2016 US car have about the same Cd.

Was US automotive legislation apparently ineffective or stagnant during the Bush/Cheney years?
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............

Last edited by kach22i; 08-12-2016 at 11:59 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2016, 11:49 AM   #13 (permalink)
Volvo-driving MachYeen
 
Fingie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Finland
Posts: 788

Neo Volvo - '98 Volvo S70 10V
90 day: 24.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 298
Thanked 82 Times in 68 Posts
Full Russian design. Was produced til 2010 and following model Priora is mainly designed on it.
__________________
If you don't make any mistakes in your life,
life itself will be a f*ckup.



With Volvo to Valhalla and back!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2016, 11:55 AM   #14 (permalink)
Volvo-driving MachYeen
 
Fingie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Finland
Posts: 788

Neo Volvo - '98 Volvo S70 10V
90 day: 24.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 298
Thanked 82 Times in 68 Posts
But it's really, really hard on the budget nowadays to get both good safety and low CD.

I am afraid my dear VAZ would crumble pretty much if it went head-on to that bolt or worse, only crumple a little and all that stopping force impacted on me
__________________
If you don't make any mistakes in your life,
life itself will be a f*ckup.



With Volvo to Valhalla and back!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2016, 12:03 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,188
Thanks: 132
Thanked 2,811 Times in 1,973 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fingie View Post
.........good safety and low CD.
Typically people argue that good safety means extra weight, which in turn is at odds with good mpg.

Please feel free to further explore the relationship of aerodynamics to safety.

I'm interested in this angle or line of thought.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2016, 12:14 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,097

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)

Oxygen Blue - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,907
Thanked 2,572 Times in 1,594 Posts
Although a relatively poor Cd is disappointing, for EV's with a rated range of less than 200 miles, how much highway cruising do you actually expect to be doing? And without access to Tesla's supercharger network?

Seems to me that EVs are mostly city vehicles at this point, making Cd one of the less important factors.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
redpoint5 (08-12-2016)
Old 08-12-2016, 02:14 PM   #17 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Lots of commuters live on highways and have round trips of well under 200 miles.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2016, 02:35 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,188
Thanks: 132
Thanked 2,811 Times in 1,973 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Charlie View Post
Lots of commuters live on highways and have round trips of well under 200 miles.
I agree, suburban commuters with less than 40 miles one way is the mean average they say.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2016, 06:02 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,324
Thanks: 24,448
Thanked 7,387 Times in 4,784 Posts
Cd 0.32

Cd 0.32 is interesting to consider in light of the Cd 0.24 Bentley Bentayga ICE SUV.
http://st.automobilemag.com/uploads/...motion-011.jpg
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2016, 01:38 AM   #20 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Vman455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Urbana, IL
Posts: 1,939

Pope Pious the Prius - '13 Toyota Prius Two
Team Toyota
SUV
90 day: 51.62 mpg (US)

Tycho the Truck - '91 Toyota Pickup DLX 4WD
90 day: 22.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 199
Thanked 1,806 Times in 942 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
Cd 0.32 is interesting to consider in light of the Cd 0.24 Bentley Bentayga ICE SUV.
http://st.automobilemag.com/uploads/...motion-011.jpg
That sounds too good to be true, so I went searching. While some magazines, like Auto Express and Automobile Magazine, reported Cd .24, Bentley's own press release specifies Cd .34 for the Bentayga. Doh!

__________________
UIUC Aerospace Engineering
www.amateuraerodynamics.com
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Vman455 For This Useful Post:
Cd (04-18-2021), NeilBlanchard (08-14-2016)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com