Yesterday, 05:48 PM
|
#1821 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,997
Thanks: 8,228
Thanked 9,001 Times in 7,435 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaac Zachary
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
When I was a kid there were less than 15,000 polar bears, now only 40,000 remain.....
|
Worldwide animal populations have dropped by over 70% in the past 50 years.
|
According to Scott Adams, any significant data are false. Were polar bears under or over reported one time or another? Worldwide animal populations includes the subterranean biosphere.
Quote:
ScienceAlert
Scientists Reveal a Massive Biosphere of Life Hidden Under Earth's ...
In a preview of results from an epic 10-year collaboration by over 1,000 scientists, Lloyd and fellow researchers with the Deep Carbon Observatory (DCO) estimate the deep biosphere - the zone of life under Earth's surface - occupies a volume of between 2 to 2.3 billion cubic kilometres (0.48 to 0.55 billion cubic miles).
Live Science
Earth's Mysterious 'Deep Biosphere' Is Home to Millions of Undiscovered ...
In a statement that dubs Earth's deep biosphere a "subterranean Galapagos" waiting to be ... the record for deepest-known life so far is about 3 miles (5 km) below the continental subsurface and 6 ...
|
Consider this a Community Note. ![Smile](/forum/images/smilies/smile.gif)
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
________________
.
.Because much of what is in the published literature is nonsense,
and much of what isn’t nonsense is not in the scientific literature.
-- Sabine Hossenfelder
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
Yesterday, 07:37 PM
|
#1822 (permalink)
|
High Altitude Hybrid
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Gunnison, CO
Posts: 2,108
Thanks: 1,145
Thanked 594 Times in 472 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
According to Scott Adams, any significant data are false.
|
Then how do we know if anything is actually true? A 73% decline that can't be trusted would have to have a huge margin of error.
Quote:
Worldwide animal populations includes the subterranean biosphere.
|
Sorry for not being more specific. The more-than-70% decline I mentioned is from monitored vertebrate animal life.
https://www.worldwildlife.org/press-...ystem-in-peril
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Isaac Zachary For This Useful Post:
|
|
Yesterday, 10:28 PM
|
#1823 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,922
Thanks: 4,355
Thanked 4,505 Times in 3,465 Posts
|
"The figures don't lie, but liars do figure".
Ants are animals, and I would be horrified to learn that the current number of them are a mere fraction of how many there used to be.
Mosquitos are animals too, and we're told they are proliferating.
|
|
|
Today, 02:37 AM
|
#1824 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,997
Thanks: 8,228
Thanked 9,001 Times in 7,435 Posts
|
Quote:
Then how do we know if anything is actually true?
|
[What was said] X {who said it] + [follow the money]
Quote:
Sorry for not being more specific.
|
I was making a point, not just picking on you. Most likely it was a subtle point about nuance. Sorry.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
________________
.
.Because much of what is in the published literature is nonsense,
and much of what isn’t nonsense is not in the scientific literature.
-- Sabine Hossenfelder
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
|
|
|